{"title":"Frontocingulate-parietal-limbic circuits associated with both ruminative brooding and self-regulatory processes.","authors":"Selena Singh, Vibooshitha Thusyanthan, Allison Mizzi, Yarden Levy, Isaac Kinley, Saurabh Bhaskar Shaw, Suzanna Becker","doi":"10.3389/fnhum.2026.1731382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ruminative brooding is a transdiagnostic symptom defined as repetitive dwelling on thoughts and emotions, and is linked to emotion dysregulation, maladaptive metacognitive beliefs, and abnormal interoception. The relative contributions of these factors and their neural mechanisms remain unclear. In this exploratory study, we mapped these processes onto directed cross-frequency coupling (CFC) networks using resting-state electroencephalography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first identified symptoms of interest for CFC analyses by employing regularized symptom networks, revealing two clusters relevant to brooding: one dominated by interoceptive/mindfulness dimensions and another by metacognitive/emotional dysregulation, with brooding belonging to the latter. We then examined links between representative symptoms from each cluster and resting-state cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) using partial least squares correlation (PLS-C).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emotional dysregulation and brooding dimensions co-varied with delta-beta PAC (representing a \"brooding/dysregulation\" neural signature), whereas mindfulness symptoms co-varied with beta-gamma and theta-gamma PAC (representing a \"mindfulness/interoception\" neural signature). More specifically, for the brooding/dysregulation signature, prefrontal and cingulate phase activity modulated amplitudes in regions implicated in emotion regulation and interoception. In contrast, the mindfulness/interoception signature reflected coupling within circuits supporting emotion regulation/interoception.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Overall, our results indicated that brooding was more tightly linked to maladaptive metacognitive beliefs and emotional dysregulation than to mindfulness/interoception, consistent with resistance toward one's thoughts and emotions. Neurally, as reflected through multivariate PLS-C covariance patterns, this may be linked to compensatory top-down control from prefrontal and cingulate areas over interoceptive, affective, and self-referential systems, pointing to the potential value of therapies that cultivate self-acceptance and modify maladaptive metacognitive beliefs for reducing rumination.</p>","PeriodicalId":12536,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","volume":"20 ","pages":"1731382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13021775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Human Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2026.1731382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Ruminative brooding is a transdiagnostic symptom defined as repetitive dwelling on thoughts and emotions, and is linked to emotion dysregulation, maladaptive metacognitive beliefs, and abnormal interoception. The relative contributions of these factors and their neural mechanisms remain unclear. In this exploratory study, we mapped these processes onto directed cross-frequency coupling (CFC) networks using resting-state electroencephalography.
Methods: We first identified symptoms of interest for CFC analyses by employing regularized symptom networks, revealing two clusters relevant to brooding: one dominated by interoceptive/mindfulness dimensions and another by metacognitive/emotional dysregulation, with brooding belonging to the latter. We then examined links between representative symptoms from each cluster and resting-state cross-frequency phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) using partial least squares correlation (PLS-C).
Results: Emotional dysregulation and brooding dimensions co-varied with delta-beta PAC (representing a "brooding/dysregulation" neural signature), whereas mindfulness symptoms co-varied with beta-gamma and theta-gamma PAC (representing a "mindfulness/interoception" neural signature). More specifically, for the brooding/dysregulation signature, prefrontal and cingulate phase activity modulated amplitudes in regions implicated in emotion regulation and interoception. In contrast, the mindfulness/interoception signature reflected coupling within circuits supporting emotion regulation/interoception.
Discussion: Overall, our results indicated that brooding was more tightly linked to maladaptive metacognitive beliefs and emotional dysregulation than to mindfulness/interoception, consistent with resistance toward one's thoughts and emotions. Neurally, as reflected through multivariate PLS-C covariance patterns, this may be linked to compensatory top-down control from prefrontal and cingulate areas over interoceptive, affective, and self-referential systems, pointing to the potential value of therapies that cultivate self-acceptance and modify maladaptive metacognitive beliefs for reducing rumination.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to understanding the brain mechanisms supporting cognitive and social behavior in humans, and how these mechanisms might be altered in disease states. The last 25 years have seen an explosive growth in both the methods and the theoretical constructs available to study the human brain. Advances in electrophysiological, neuroimaging, neuropsychological, psychophysical, neuropharmacological and computational approaches have provided key insights into the mechanisms of a broad range of human behaviors in both health and disease. Work in human neuroscience ranges from the cognitive domain, including areas such as memory, attention, language and perception to the social domain, with this last subject addressing topics, such as interpersonal interactions, social discourse and emotional regulation. How these processes unfold during development, mature in adulthood and often decline in aging, and how they are altered in a host of developmental, neurological and psychiatric disorders, has become increasingly amenable to human neuroscience research approaches. Work in human neuroscience has influenced many areas of inquiry ranging from social and cognitive psychology to economics, law and public policy. Accordingly, our journal will provide a forum for human research spanning all areas of human cognitive, social, developmental and translational neuroscience using any research approach.