{"title":"Seeing the bigger picture: Pathways to carbon neutrality in the hard-to-abate sector–insights from a field study","authors":"Alok Raj, Sriram Narayanan, Samit Paul, Saroj Kumar Singh, Subodha Kumar","doi":"10.1111/deci.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Reducing carbon emissions in the hard-to-abate sector is crucial yet challenging for achieving carbon neutrality. This study explores pathways to carbon neutrality in steel industry using Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) technology. Employing a design science research approach anchored in the Natural Resource-Based View (NRBV), this study examines the intervention, mechanisms, and outcomes of CCU technology implementation within a leading steel manufacturing facility. The intervention led to an average CO<sub>2</sub> reduction of around 9% and economic benefits of around $89,825 per month from the pilot project. This study extends to the cement, oil and gas, and fertilizer industries, enhancing the generalizability of its findings. It demonstrates that more than a technological shift, CCU technology adoption represents a comprehensive transformation, encompassing process, product, and administrative innovations. The research also highlights key challenges and trade-offs, including safety concerns, spatial constraints, and integrating new processes into existing frameworks. Emphasizing the need to build internal and external capabilities, it underscores process modifications, innovative ways of CO<sub>2</sub> utilization, and broad stakeholder collaboration as critical factors. Ultimately, this study advances the understanding of viable pathways for CO<sub>2</sub> emission reduction through CCU technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"57 1","pages":"24-46"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Reducing carbon emissions in the hard-to-abate sector is crucial yet challenging for achieving carbon neutrality. This study explores pathways to carbon neutrality in steel industry using Carbon Capture and Utilization (CCU) technology. Employing a design science research approach anchored in the Natural Resource-Based View (NRBV), this study examines the intervention, mechanisms, and outcomes of CCU technology implementation within a leading steel manufacturing facility. The intervention led to an average CO2 reduction of around 9% and economic benefits of around $89,825 per month from the pilot project. This study extends to the cement, oil and gas, and fertilizer industries, enhancing the generalizability of its findings. It demonstrates that more than a technological shift, CCU technology adoption represents a comprehensive transformation, encompassing process, product, and administrative innovations. The research also highlights key challenges and trade-offs, including safety concerns, spatial constraints, and integrating new processes into existing frameworks. Emphasizing the need to build internal and external capabilities, it underscores process modifications, innovative ways of CO2 utilization, and broad stakeholder collaboration as critical factors. Ultimately, this study advances the understanding of viable pathways for CO2 emission reduction through CCU technology.
期刊介绍:
Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.