Navigating the Flow: Unveiling Directional Information Transfer in Commodity Markets With Transfer Entropy and Moving Window Analysis

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Complexity Pub Date : 2026-03-11 DOI:10.1155/cplx/5511110
Insu Choi, Woo Chang Kim
{"title":"Navigating the Flow: Unveiling Directional Information Transfer in Commodity Markets With Transfer Entropy and Moving Window Analysis","authors":"Insu Choi,&nbsp;Woo Chang Kim","doi":"10.1155/cplx/5511110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines directional information flow in commodity futures markets using transfer entropy (TE) and Granger causality (GC) over 21.5 years. Analyzing 12 major commodities through rolling windows of 20, 60, 120, and 240 days, we compare linear versus nonlinear transmission mechanisms across different market conditions. The results show that while GC captures persistent linear relationships with monotonically increasing detection rates, TE reveals complementary nonlinear dependencies following nonlinear patterns. During crisis periods, network density increases significantly, with the COVID-19 pandemic producing pronounced nonlinear effects where TE substantially exceeds GC. Energy commodities dominate linear channels, while agricultural commodities emerge as central nodes in nonlinear networks. Period-specific analysis reveals regime-dependent transmission: postcrisis periods return to linear relationships, while commodity-specific shocks activate different nonlinear pathways than systemic crises. The findings demonstrate that comprehensive commodity market analysis requires both methodologies to capture the full spectrum of information transmission mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50653,"journal":{"name":"Complexity","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/cplx/5511110","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/cplx/5511110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines directional information flow in commodity futures markets using transfer entropy (TE) and Granger causality (GC) over 21.5 years. Analyzing 12 major commodities through rolling windows of 20, 60, 120, and 240 days, we compare linear versus nonlinear transmission mechanisms across different market conditions. The results show that while GC captures persistent linear relationships with monotonically increasing detection rates, TE reveals complementary nonlinear dependencies following nonlinear patterns. During crisis periods, network density increases significantly, with the COVID-19 pandemic producing pronounced nonlinear effects where TE substantially exceeds GC. Energy commodities dominate linear channels, while agricultural commodities emerge as central nodes in nonlinear networks. Period-specific analysis reveals regime-dependent transmission: postcrisis periods return to linear relationships, while commodity-specific shocks activate different nonlinear pathways than systemic crises. The findings demonstrate that comprehensive commodity market analysis requires both methodologies to capture the full spectrum of information transmission mechanisms.

Abstract Image

在流动中导航:用传递熵和移动窗口分析揭示商品市场中的定向信息传递
本研究利用转移熵(TE)和格兰杰因果关系(GC)检验了21.5年来商品期货市场的方向性信息流。我们通过20、60、120和240天的滚动窗口分析了12种主要商品,比较了不同市场条件下的线性与非线性传导机制。结果表明,虽然GC捕获了单调增加的检测率的持久线性关系,但TE显示了非线性模式下的互补非线性依赖关系。在危机时期,网络密度显著增加,新冠肺炎大流行产生明显的非线性效应,TE大幅超过GC。能源商品在线性渠道中占主导地位,而农产品在非线性网络中成为中心节点。特定时期的分析揭示了制度依赖的传导:危机后时期回归线性关系,而特定商品的冲击激活了不同于系统性危机的非线性途径。研究结果表明,全面的商品市场分析需要两种方法来捕捉信息传递机制的全部频谱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complexity
Complexity 综合性期刊-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
595
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Complexity is a cross-disciplinary journal focusing on the rapidly expanding science of complex adaptive systems. The purpose of the journal is to advance the science of complexity. Articles may deal with such methodological themes as chaos, genetic algorithms, cellular automata, neural networks, and evolutionary game theory. Papers treating applications in any area of natural science or human endeavor are welcome, and especially encouraged are papers integrating conceptual themes and applications that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. Complexity is not meant to serve as a forum for speculation and vague analogies between words like “chaos,” “self-organization,” and “emergence” that are often used in completely different ways in science and in daily life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书