Self-Other Stances in Reverse Mentoring for Workplace Inclusion: Mutual Relating Across Differences in Hierarchies and Identities

IF 3.8 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Human Resource Development Quarterly Pub Date : 2026-03-17 Epub Date: 2025-03-06 DOI:10.1002/hrdq.21561
Rajashi Ghosh, Julie Nyanjom
{"title":"Self-Other Stances in Reverse Mentoring for Workplace Inclusion: Mutual Relating Across Differences in Hierarchies and Identities","authors":"Rajashi Ghosh,&nbsp;Julie Nyanjom","doi":"10.1002/hrdq.21561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Reverse mentoring (RM) is increasingly being utilized as a tool for learning in diverse workforces. Although previous studies highlight the importance of mutuality in RM relationships, there is a dearth of studies on mutual relating mechanisms in RM. This study explored how mentors who have minoritized identities and hold junior organizational positions and mentees who have privileged identities and hold senior organizational positions relate to each other mutually impact workplace inclusion. In-depth semi-structured interviews with RM dyads from a multinational company with headquarters in Australia were held. Interpretive phenomenological analysis was applied to explore how participants interpreted the ways in which they related to each other. Our findings indicate both mentees and mentors adopted a mutual self-other stance of relating in RM relationships, which enabled them to be attuned to each other's needs and develop a communal connection in their RM relationships. Our study derives a theoretical model of mutual self-other stances in RM underlying five mechanisms of mutual relating: (1) switching the learner-expert dynamics; (2) welcoming personalization; (3) using proactivity; (4) leaning on spontaneity; and (5) embracing vulnerability. Implications for research and practice on how this knowledge can help mentors, mentees, organizational leaders, and human resource development professionals to study, design, and implement RM programs for inclusion are presented.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47803,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","volume":"37 1","pages":"29-47"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21561","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reverse mentoring (RM) is increasingly being utilized as a tool for learning in diverse workforces. Although previous studies highlight the importance of mutuality in RM relationships, there is a dearth of studies on mutual relating mechanisms in RM. This study explored how mentors who have minoritized identities and hold junior organizational positions and mentees who have privileged identities and hold senior organizational positions relate to each other mutually impact workplace inclusion. In-depth semi-structured interviews with RM dyads from a multinational company with headquarters in Australia were held. Interpretive phenomenological analysis was applied to explore how participants interpreted the ways in which they related to each other. Our findings indicate both mentees and mentors adopted a mutual self-other stance of relating in RM relationships, which enabled them to be attuned to each other's needs and develop a communal connection in their RM relationships. Our study derives a theoretical model of mutual self-other stances in RM underlying five mechanisms of mutual relating: (1) switching the learner-expert dynamics; (2) welcoming personalization; (3) using proactivity; (4) leaning on spontaneity; and (5) embracing vulnerability. Implications for research and practice on how this knowledge can help mentors, mentees, organizational leaders, and human resource development professionals to study, design, and implement RM programs for inclusion are presented.

职场包容反向指导中的自我-他者立场:跨层级和身份差异的相互关联
反向指导(RM)越来越多地被用作在不同的工作队伍中学习的工具。虽然以往的研究强调了相互关系在RM关系中的重要性,但对RM中相互关系机制的研究却很少。本研究探讨了具有少数群体身份并担任初级组织职位的导师与具有特权身份并担任高级组织职位的学员如何相互影响工作场所包容性。与总部位于澳大利亚的跨国公司的RM进行了深入的半结构化访谈。解释现象学分析被应用于探索参与者如何解释他们彼此相关的方式。我们的研究结果表明,师徒在RM关系中都采取了一种相互的自我-他者关系立场,这使得他们能够适应彼此的需求,并在RM关系中发展出一种共同的联系。本研究提出了RM中自我-他者相互立场的理论模型,该模型基于五种相互关联机制:(1)学习者-专家动态的转换;(2)欢迎个性化;(3)积极主动;(4)依靠自发性;(5)拥抱脆弱。这些知识如何帮助导师、学员、组织领导者和人力资源开发专业人员研究、设计和实施RM包容性项目,对研究和实践具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Human Resource Development Quarterly (HRDQ) is the first scholarly journal focused directly on the evolving field of human resource development (HRD). It provides a central focus for research on human resource development issues as well as the means for disseminating such research. HRDQ recognizes the interdisciplinary nature of the HRD field and brings together relevant research from the related fields, such as economics, education, management, sociology, and psychology. It provides an important link in the application of theory and research to HRD practice. HRDQ publishes scholarly work that addresses the theoretical foundations of HRD, HRD research, and evaluation of HRD interventions and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书