Empowering Senegalese Farmers Through Adaptive Expenditure Strategies for Climate Resilience

IF 4.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Mohammad Tirgariseraji, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi
{"title":"Empowering Senegalese Farmers Through Adaptive Expenditure Strategies for Climate Resilience","authors":"Mohammad Tirgariseraji,&nbsp;A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi","doi":"10.1002/fes3.70216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Farmer households employ various coping strategies to address climate and non-climate shocks, which are primarily categorized into production-focused and consumption-focused approaches. While the former has been extensively remarked on in recent studies, the latter has received little attention in the literature. In this study, we developed consumption-focused coping strategies by balancing the likelihood of household shock exposure with welfare outcomes for 1369 farmer households in Senegal. The outcomes are estimated using a discrete choice model regression. We then modeled the challenges faced by Senegalese farmer households using a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach, enabling us to measure household efficiency in achieving balanced gains. The household shock exposure regression equation results confirmed the role of food and non-food factors in controlling the probability of shock; however, outcomes may vary across households, particularly in expenditure items linked to lifestyle transformations. The DEA results revealed a non-linear relationship between shock exposure probability and efficiency scores, explaining the variability observed in household expenditure outcomes. Excitingly, the nonlinear impact of shock efficiency was rarely observed for food expenditure items, highlighting an unexpected resilience in this crucial area. These results indicate that policies aimed at improving consumption-based welfare should be differentiated rather than uniformly applied. The empirical findings show relatively consistent responses in food consumption across households, supporting the use of broadly implemented food-related assistance and nutrition security programs. In contrast, nonfood consumption responses exhibit substantial heterogeneity, particularly for health, education, and mobility-related expenditures. Accordingly, interventions targeting these domains should be tailored to household characteristics and efficiency levels to more effectively buffer welfare losses under economic and environmental shocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.70216","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.70216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Farmer households employ various coping strategies to address climate and non-climate shocks, which are primarily categorized into production-focused and consumption-focused approaches. While the former has been extensively remarked on in recent studies, the latter has received little attention in the literature. In this study, we developed consumption-focused coping strategies by balancing the likelihood of household shock exposure with welfare outcomes for 1369 farmer households in Senegal. The outcomes are estimated using a discrete choice model regression. We then modeled the challenges faced by Senegalese farmer households using a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach, enabling us to measure household efficiency in achieving balanced gains. The household shock exposure regression equation results confirmed the role of food and non-food factors in controlling the probability of shock; however, outcomes may vary across households, particularly in expenditure items linked to lifestyle transformations. The DEA results revealed a non-linear relationship between shock exposure probability and efficiency scores, explaining the variability observed in household expenditure outcomes. Excitingly, the nonlinear impact of shock efficiency was rarely observed for food expenditure items, highlighting an unexpected resilience in this crucial area. These results indicate that policies aimed at improving consumption-based welfare should be differentiated rather than uniformly applied. The empirical findings show relatively consistent responses in food consumption across households, supporting the use of broadly implemented food-related assistance and nutrition security programs. In contrast, nonfood consumption responses exhibit substantial heterogeneity, particularly for health, education, and mobility-related expenditures. Accordingly, interventions targeting these domains should be tailored to household characteristics and efficiency levels to more effectively buffer welfare losses under economic and environmental shocks.

Abstract Image

通过适应性支出战略增强塞内加尔农民的权能,以增强气候适应能力
农户采用各种应对策略来应对气候和非气候冲击,这些策略主要分为以生产为重点和以消费为重点。虽然前者在最近的研究中得到了广泛的评论,但后者在文献中却很少受到关注。在这项研究中,我们通过平衡塞内加尔1369个农户家庭遭受冲击的可能性与福利结果,制定了以消费为中心的应对策略。使用离散选择模型回归估计结果。然后,我们使用数据包络分析(DEA)方法对塞内加尔农户面临的挑战进行建模,使我们能够衡量家庭在实现平衡收益方面的效率。家庭休克暴露回归方程结果证实了食物和非食物因素对休克发生概率的控制作用;然而,结果可能因家庭而异,特别是在与生活方式转变相关的支出项目上。DEA结果揭示了冲击暴露概率和效率得分之间的非线性关系,解释了在家庭支出结果中观察到的可变性。令人兴奋的是,很少观察到冲击效率对食品支出项目的非线性影响,突出了这一关键领域意想不到的弹性。这些结果表明,旨在提高以消费为基础的福利的政策应加以区分,而不是统一实施。实证研究结果显示,各家庭在食品消费方面的反应相对一致,支持广泛实施与食品有关的援助和营养安全计划。相比之下,非食品消费反应表现出很大的异质性,特别是在健康、教育和与流动性相关的支出方面。因此,针对这些领域的干预措施应根据家庭特点和效率水平进行调整,以更有效地缓冲经济和环境冲击下的福利损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Energy Security
Food and Energy Security Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor. Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights. Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge. Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include: • Agronomy • Biotechnological Approaches • Breeding & Genetics • Climate Change • Quality and Composition • Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks • Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry • Functional Genomics • Molecular Biology • Pest and Disease Management • Post Harvest Biology • Soil Science • Systems Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书