Split-screen distraction: the role of extraneous visual demands in learning from video.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Brendan A Schuetze
{"title":"Split-screen distraction: the role of extraneous visual demands in learning from video.","authors":"Brendan A Schuetze","doi":"10.1186/s41235-026-00720-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A genre of online videos known as \"sludge content\" has recently surged in popularity. These videos typically present two clips simultaneously, with one primary and one muted secondary video, creating an intentionally overstimulating viewing experience. Given the reliance on overstimulation and the inherent multitasking demands, these videos raise questions relevant to theories of multimedia learning and cognitive load. Inspired by this content format, a series of within-person studies was conducted to test whether simultaneous split-screen videos lead to changes in comprehension and memory. Two preregistered within-person studies (N<sub>Study 1</sub> = 75, N<sub>Study 2</sub> = 100) were employed to examine whether simultaneous split-screen presentations impaired comprehension or memory. Contrary to predictions, no strong evidence that simultaneous video presentation affected memory was found. Limited self-reported differences in interest with higher interest reported for non-split-screen videos were found in Study 2, but no differences in attention difficulty or cognitive load. These findings suggest that viewers may adapt to extraneous split-screen visual input more effectively than commonly assumed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46827,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13018501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-026-00720-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A genre of online videos known as "sludge content" has recently surged in popularity. These videos typically present two clips simultaneously, with one primary and one muted secondary video, creating an intentionally overstimulating viewing experience. Given the reliance on overstimulation and the inherent multitasking demands, these videos raise questions relevant to theories of multimedia learning and cognitive load. Inspired by this content format, a series of within-person studies was conducted to test whether simultaneous split-screen videos lead to changes in comprehension and memory. Two preregistered within-person studies (NStudy 1 = 75, NStudy 2 = 100) were employed to examine whether simultaneous split-screen presentations impaired comprehension or memory. Contrary to predictions, no strong evidence that simultaneous video presentation affected memory was found. Limited self-reported differences in interest with higher interest reported for non-split-screen videos were found in Study 2, but no differences in attention difficulty or cognitive load. These findings suggest that viewers may adapt to extraneous split-screen visual input more effectively than commonly assumed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分屏分心:在视频学习中外来视觉需求的作用。
最近,一种被称为“污泥内容”的网络视频类型迅速流行起来。这些视频通常同时呈现两个片段,一个主要视频和一个静音的次要视频,故意创造一种过度刺激的观看体验。鉴于过度刺激的依赖和固有的多任务处理需求,这些视频提出了与多媒体学习和认知负荷理论相关的问题。受这种内容格式的启发,研究者进行了一系列的面对面研究,以测试同时播放的分屏视频是否会导致理解和记忆的变化。两项预先注册的人体内研究(NStudy 1 = 75, NStudy 2 = 100)被用来检查同时分屏呈现是否会损害理解或记忆。与预测相反,没有强有力的证据表明同时播放视频会影响记忆。在研究2中发现,对于非分屏视频,自我报告的兴趣差异有限,报告的兴趣较高,但在注意困难或认知负荷方面没有差异。这些发现表明,观众可能比通常认为的更有效地适应无关的分屏视觉输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书