Disguising the Familiar: Considering Internal Confidentiality in Individual Interviews With Partners and Families

IF 4.5 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Susie Bower‐Brown, Clare Stovell
{"title":"Disguising the Familiar: Considering Internal Confidentiality in Individual Interviews With Partners and Families","authors":"Susie Bower‐Brown, Clare Stovell","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws attention to the ethical and methodological complexities of internal confidentiality in family research and provides field‐specific recommendations. Conducting individual (rather than joint) interviews with partners or multiple members of the same family is common but poses significant challenges around internal confidentiality, defined as participants' ability to recognize each other in research reports. Family research's focus on close relationships, diverse family forms, and children heightens the risks and consequences of breaching internal confidentiality, yet explicit consideration of this issue is lacking in the methodological and family literatures. Drawing on firsthand experience with two research projects, this article outlines the challenges of preserving internal confidentiality, the benefits of individual interviews, and key recommendations. We recommend that researchers develop flexible strategies for addressing internal confidentiality, and our guidelines offer practical solutions, from research design to data reporting. By addressing the complexities of internal confidentiality, we aim to prevent harm to participants and enhance the integrity of family studies.","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"77 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.70047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article draws attention to the ethical and methodological complexities of internal confidentiality in family research and provides field‐specific recommendations. Conducting individual (rather than joint) interviews with partners or multiple members of the same family is common but poses significant challenges around internal confidentiality, defined as participants' ability to recognize each other in research reports. Family research's focus on close relationships, diverse family forms, and children heightens the risks and consequences of breaching internal confidentiality, yet explicit consideration of this issue is lacking in the methodological and family literatures. Drawing on firsthand experience with two research projects, this article outlines the challenges of preserving internal confidentiality, the benefits of individual interviews, and key recommendations. We recommend that researchers develop flexible strategies for addressing internal confidentiality, and our guidelines offer practical solutions, from research design to data reporting. By addressing the complexities of internal confidentiality, we aim to prevent harm to participants and enhance the integrity of family studies.
掩饰熟悉的事物:在与伴侣和家人的个人访谈中考虑内部保密性
这篇文章引起了对家庭研究中内部保密的伦理和方法复杂性的关注,并提供了具体领域的建议。与合作伙伴或同一家庭的多个成员进行单独(而不是联合)访谈是很常见的,但在内部保密方面存在重大挑战,这被定义为参与者在研究报告中相互识别的能力。家庭研究对亲密关系、多样家庭形式和子女的关注,增加了违反内部保密的风险和后果,但在方法学和家庭文献中缺乏对这一问题的明确考虑。根据两个研究项目的第一手经验,本文概述了保持内部机密的挑战,个人访谈的好处以及关键建议。我们建议研究人员制定灵活的策略来解决内部保密问题,我们的指南提供了从研究设计到数据报告的实际解决方案。通过解决内部保密的复杂性,我们的目标是防止对参与者造成伤害,并提高家庭研究的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书