Overqualified Civil Servants, a Bargain or a Risk in a Turbulent Public Sector? Examining the Impact of Overqualification Within Teams on Trust in Change Management and Qualitative Job Insecurity

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Jan Wynen, Stéphanie Verlinden, Bjorn Kleizen, Danika Pieters, Koen Verhoest
{"title":"Overqualified Civil Servants, a Bargain or a Risk in a Turbulent Public Sector? Examining the Impact of Overqualification Within Teams on Trust in Change Management and Qualitative Job Insecurity","authors":"Jan Wynen, Stéphanie Verlinden, Bjorn Kleizen, Danika Pieters, Koen Verhoest","doi":"10.1177/0734371x261420114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public organizations regularly undergo reforms that create uncertainty for employees. Trust in change management, meaning employees believe leaders will handle reforms fairly, transparently and competently, is essential for coping with such changes. Team dynamics can weaken this trust. One important factor is overqualification, which occurs when employees have more skills or education than their job requires. Although sometimes viewed as an advantage, overqualification can also create frustration and doubt during reform. This study examines how the presence of overqualified employees in teams affects collective trust in change management and shapes perceptions of qualitative job insecurity, the feeling that valued aspects of work are under threat. Using data from a Belgian government agency, the findings show that teams with more overqualified employees report lower trust in change management, which increases qualitative job insecurity. The results highlight the paradox of overqualification and its implications for managing change.","PeriodicalId":47609,"journal":{"name":"Review of Public Personnel Administration","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Public Personnel Administration","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x261420114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public organizations regularly undergo reforms that create uncertainty for employees. Trust in change management, meaning employees believe leaders will handle reforms fairly, transparently and competently, is essential for coping with such changes. Team dynamics can weaken this trust. One important factor is overqualification, which occurs when employees have more skills or education than their job requires. Although sometimes viewed as an advantage, overqualification can also create frustration and doubt during reform. This study examines how the presence of overqualified employees in teams affects collective trust in change management and shapes perceptions of qualitative job insecurity, the feeling that valued aspects of work are under threat. Using data from a Belgian government agency, the findings show that teams with more overqualified employees report lower trust in change management, which increases qualitative job insecurity. The results highlight the paradox of overqualification and its implications for managing change.
在动荡的公共部门,大师级公务员是便宜货还是风险?考察团队内部资历过高对变革管理信任和定性工作不安全感的影响
公共机构定期进行改革,给员工带来不确定性。对变革管理的信任,意味着员工相信领导者会公平、透明和称职地处理改革,这对于应对此类变化至关重要。团队动态会削弱这种信任。一个重要的因素是资历过高,当员工的技能或受教育程度超过工作要求时,就会出现这种情况。虽然有时被视为一种优势,但资格过高也会在改革过程中造成挫折和怀疑。本研究考察了团队中大师级员工的存在如何影响变革管理中的集体信任,并形成了对定性工作不安全感的看法,即工作中有价值的方面受到威胁的感觉。根据比利时一家政府机构的数据,研究结果显示,资历过高的员工较多的团队对变革管理的信任度较低,这增加了工作的不安全感。研究结果突出了资历过高的悖论及其对管理变革的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The Review of Public Personnel Administration publishes articles that reflect the varied approaches and methodologies used in the study and practice of public human resources management and labor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书