Factors Associated With Opioid Agonist Treatment Engagement and Harm Reduction Service Use: Findings From the New South Wales Opioid Dependence Survey

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Thomas Santo Jr, Chrianna Bharat, Craig Rodgers, Mary Harrod, Sophia Taylor, Emma Zahra, Rachel Sutherland, Amy Peacock, Jason Grebely, Matthew Hickman, Michael Farrell, Louisa Degenhardt
{"title":"Factors Associated With Opioid Agonist Treatment Engagement and Harm Reduction Service Use: Findings From the New South Wales Opioid Dependence Survey","authors":"Thomas Santo Jr,&nbsp;Chrianna Bharat,&nbsp;Craig Rodgers,&nbsp;Mary Harrod,&nbsp;Sophia Taylor,&nbsp;Emma Zahra,&nbsp;Rachel Sutherland,&nbsp;Amy Peacock,&nbsp;Jason Grebely,&nbsp;Matthew Hickman,&nbsp;Michael Farrell,&nbsp;Louisa Degenhardt","doi":"10.1111/dar.70132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is one of the most effective treatments for opioid dependence, but there can be barriers to accessing treatment. This study examined characteristics associated with OAT engagement—never, previous or current—among people with opioid dependence in NSW, Australia, following recent reforms to OAT access.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Between October 2023 and March 2024, people with opioid dependence were recruited from services and community settings across NSW. Participants completed structured interviews on socio-demographics, mental health disorders, substance use and use of prevention and treatment services. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between participant characteristics and engagement with OAT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 403 participants (mean age 44; 65% male), 77% were currently receiving OAT (60% methadone, 11% sublingual buprenorphine and 27% long-acting injectable buprenorphine), 13% previously and 9% never. Differences between OAT status groups included those currently receiving OAT reporting lower rates of homelessness and extra-medical opioid use, and greater group therapy engagement and past-year receipt of naloxone kits compared to those previously and never receiving OAT. Past-month daily injecting drug use was higher among those previously and never receiving OAT; those previously receiving OAT also reported the highest rate of past-year supervised injecting facility use and overdoses in the past 6 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Those not receiving OAT reported greater social instability, recent injecting drug use and drug-related harm. Variation in harm reduction service use suggests tailored strategies are needed to reach those outside OAT. These findings highlight the need for integrated, diverse strategies to address dependence-related harms.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12998408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dar.70132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Opioid agonist treatment (OAT) is one of the most effective treatments for opioid dependence, but there can be barriers to accessing treatment. This study examined characteristics associated with OAT engagement—never, previous or current—among people with opioid dependence in NSW, Australia, following recent reforms to OAT access.

Methods

Between October 2023 and March 2024, people with opioid dependence were recruited from services and community settings across NSW. Participants completed structured interviews on socio-demographics, mental health disorders, substance use and use of prevention and treatment services. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between participant characteristics and engagement with OAT.

Results

Of 403 participants (mean age 44; 65% male), 77% were currently receiving OAT (60% methadone, 11% sublingual buprenorphine and 27% long-acting injectable buprenorphine), 13% previously and 9% never. Differences between OAT status groups included those currently receiving OAT reporting lower rates of homelessness and extra-medical opioid use, and greater group therapy engagement and past-year receipt of naloxone kits compared to those previously and never receiving OAT. Past-month daily injecting drug use was higher among those previously and never receiving OAT; those previously receiving OAT also reported the highest rate of past-year supervised injecting facility use and overdoses in the past 6 months.

Discussion and Conclusions

Those not receiving OAT reported greater social instability, recent injecting drug use and drug-related harm. Variation in harm reduction service use suggests tailored strategies are needed to reach those outside OAT. These findings highlight the need for integrated, diverse strategies to address dependence-related harms.

与阿片类激动剂治疗参与和减少危害服务使用相关的因素:来自新南威尔士州阿片类药物依赖调查的结果。
阿片类药物激动剂治疗(OAT)是阿片类药物依赖最有效的治疗方法之一,但在获得治疗方面可能存在障碍。本研究调查了澳大利亚新南威尔士州阿片类药物依赖者在最近对OAT准入进行改革后与OAT参与相关的特征——从未、以前或现在。方法:在2023年10月至2024年3月期间,从新南威尔士州的服务和社区环境中招募了阿片类药物依赖者。参与者完成了关于社会人口统计学、精神健康障碍、药物使用以及预防和治疗服务使用情况的结构化访谈。使用逻辑回归来检验参与者特征与参与OAT之间的关联。结果:403名参与者(平均年龄44岁,65%为男性)中,77%目前正在接受OAT(60%为美沙酮,11%为舌下丁丙诺啡,27%为长效注射丁丙诺啡),13%以前接受过OAT, 9%从未接受OAT。OAT状态组之间的差异包括,目前接受OAT的人报告的无家可归率和医疗外阿片类药物使用率较低,与以前和从未接受OAT的人相比,更多的群体治疗参与和过去一年纳洛酮包的接收。过去一个月每日注射药物使用率在以前和从未接受过OAT的人群中较高;那些以前接受过OAT的人也报告了过去一年在监督下使用注射设施和在过去6个月内过量使用的比率最高。讨论和结论:那些没有接受OAT的人报告了更大的社会不稳定,最近注射吸毒和与毒品有关的伤害。减少伤害服务使用的差异表明,需要有针对性的战略来覆盖OAT以外的人群。这些发现强调了需要采取综合的、多样化的策略来解决与依赖相关的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书