Detecting statistical interactions in immune receptor data: a comparative study.

IF 1.1 4区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Journal of Applied Statistics Pub Date : 2025-07-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/02664763.2025.2533483
Thomas Minotto, Ingrid Hobæk Haff, Enrico Riccardi, Geir K Sandve
{"title":"Detecting statistical interactions in immune receptor data: a comparative study.","authors":"Thomas Minotto, Ingrid Hobæk Haff, Enrico Riccardi, Geir K Sandve","doi":"10.1080/02664763.2025.2533483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statistical interactions are part of numerous data generating processes and several methods have been developed to detect them. We here study immune receptors binding to antigens, where advanced machine learning techniques have proved useful for binding prediction, suggesting significant intra amino acid chain interactions. We reviewed detection methods based on logistic lasso, logic regression, random forests and neural networks. We compared detection performance in simulated immune data, and how it is affected by the order of interactions, their strength related to the main effects, their frequency of occurrence and the size of the data. Interactions were implanted as motifs of amino acids that determined the binding status of sequences through a logistic regression model. Results show that pairwise interactions were retrieved from just 1000 sequences in the dataset, and optimal detection happened for an implantation rate of around 20 percent. For higher-order interactions, the best performance was obtained by logic regression and random forest based methods. The running time for the neural network-based method was several orders of magnitude lower, followed by the lasso-based methods. We applied the methods on an experimental dataset and identified several pairwise interactions as well as a three-way interaction, enhancing the accuracy of prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Statistics","volume":"53 4","pages":"729-750"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12981274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2025.2533483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statistical interactions are part of numerous data generating processes and several methods have been developed to detect them. We here study immune receptors binding to antigens, where advanced machine learning techniques have proved useful for binding prediction, suggesting significant intra amino acid chain interactions. We reviewed detection methods based on logistic lasso, logic regression, random forests and neural networks. We compared detection performance in simulated immune data, and how it is affected by the order of interactions, their strength related to the main effects, their frequency of occurrence and the size of the data. Interactions were implanted as motifs of amino acids that determined the binding status of sequences through a logistic regression model. Results show that pairwise interactions were retrieved from just 1000 sequences in the dataset, and optimal detection happened for an implantation rate of around 20 percent. For higher-order interactions, the best performance was obtained by logic regression and random forest based methods. The running time for the neural network-based method was several orders of magnitude lower, followed by the lasso-based methods. We applied the methods on an experimental dataset and identified several pairwise interactions as well as a three-way interaction, enhancing the accuracy of prediction models.

检测免疫受体数据中的统计相互作用:一项比较研究。
统计相互作用是许多数据产生过程的一部分,已经开发了几种方法来检测它们。我们在这里研究免疫受体与抗原的结合,其中先进的机器学习技术已被证明对结合预测有用,表明显着的氨基酸链内相互作用。本文综述了基于逻辑套索、逻辑回归、随机森林和神经网络的检测方法。我们比较了模拟免疫数据中的检测性能,以及它如何受到相互作用顺序、与主要效应相关的强度、发生频率和数据大小的影响。相互作用被植入氨基酸基序,通过逻辑回归模型确定序列的结合状态。结果表明,仅从数据集中的1000个序列中检索到成对相互作用,并且在植入率约为20%的情况下进行了最佳检测。对于高阶交互,采用逻辑回归和基于随机森林的方法获得了最佳性能。基于神经网络的方法运行时间比基于套索的方法低几个数量级,其次是基于套索的方法。我们将该方法应用于一个实验数据集,并确定了几个成对相互作用以及一个三方相互作用,提高了预测模型的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Statistics
Journal of Applied Statistics 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Statistics provides a forum for communication between both applied statisticians and users of applied statistical techniques across a wide range of disciplines. These areas include business, computing, economics, ecology, education, management, medicine, operational research and sociology, but papers from other areas are also considered. The editorial policy is to publish rigorous but clear and accessible papers on applied techniques. Purely theoretical papers are avoided but those on theoretical developments which clearly demonstrate significant applied potential are welcomed. Each paper is submitted to at least two independent referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书