Thomas Minotto, Ingrid Hobæk Haff, Enrico Riccardi, Geir K Sandve
{"title":"Detecting statistical interactions in immune receptor data: a comparative study.","authors":"Thomas Minotto, Ingrid Hobæk Haff, Enrico Riccardi, Geir K Sandve","doi":"10.1080/02664763.2025.2533483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statistical interactions are part of numerous data generating processes and several methods have been developed to detect them. We here study immune receptors binding to antigens, where advanced machine learning techniques have proved useful for binding prediction, suggesting significant intra amino acid chain interactions. We reviewed detection methods based on logistic lasso, logic regression, random forests and neural networks. We compared detection performance in simulated immune data, and how it is affected by the order of interactions, their strength related to the main effects, their frequency of occurrence and the size of the data. Interactions were implanted as motifs of amino acids that determined the binding status of sequences through a logistic regression model. Results show that pairwise interactions were retrieved from just 1000 sequences in the dataset, and optimal detection happened for an implantation rate of around 20 percent. For higher-order interactions, the best performance was obtained by logic regression and random forest based methods. The running time for the neural network-based method was several orders of magnitude lower, followed by the lasso-based methods. We applied the methods on an experimental dataset and identified several pairwise interactions as well as a three-way interaction, enhancing the accuracy of prediction models.</p>","PeriodicalId":15239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Statistics","volume":"53 4","pages":"729-750"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12981274/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2025.2533483","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Statistical interactions are part of numerous data generating processes and several methods have been developed to detect them. We here study immune receptors binding to antigens, where advanced machine learning techniques have proved useful for binding prediction, suggesting significant intra amino acid chain interactions. We reviewed detection methods based on logistic lasso, logic regression, random forests and neural networks. We compared detection performance in simulated immune data, and how it is affected by the order of interactions, their strength related to the main effects, their frequency of occurrence and the size of the data. Interactions were implanted as motifs of amino acids that determined the binding status of sequences through a logistic regression model. Results show that pairwise interactions were retrieved from just 1000 sequences in the dataset, and optimal detection happened for an implantation rate of around 20 percent. For higher-order interactions, the best performance was obtained by logic regression and random forest based methods. The running time for the neural network-based method was several orders of magnitude lower, followed by the lasso-based methods. We applied the methods on an experimental dataset and identified several pairwise interactions as well as a three-way interaction, enhancing the accuracy of prediction models.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Statistics provides a forum for communication between both applied statisticians and users of applied statistical techniques across a wide range of disciplines. These areas include business, computing, economics, ecology, education, management, medicine, operational research and sociology, but papers from other areas are also considered. The editorial policy is to publish rigorous but clear and accessible papers on applied techniques. Purely theoretical papers are avoided but those on theoretical developments which clearly demonstrate significant applied potential are welcomed. Each paper is submitted to at least two independent referees.