Development and Validation of the Outcomes of WeLlbeing and Distress Scale for Adults With an Intellectual Disability (OWLS-ID), Formally Known as the PTOS-ID.
Emily Kerry, Nigel Beail, Nik Vlissides, Chris Gaskell, Gregg Harry Rawlings
{"title":"Development and Validation of the Outcomes of WeLlbeing and Distress Scale for Adults With an Intellectual Disability (OWLS-ID), Formally Known as the PTOS-ID.","authors":"Emily Kerry, Nigel Beail, Nik Vlissides, Chris Gaskell, Gregg Harry Rawlings","doi":"10.1111/jir.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Psychological Therapies Outcome Scale-Intellectual Disabilities-II (PTOS-ID-II) is a 29-item self-report measure developed to assess psychological distress and positive well-being in people with an intellectual disability. While initial validation demonstrated promising psychometric properties, further replication in a larger sample was needed, and incorporating insights gained from routine clinical use over the years since its initial implementation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quantitative cross-sectional design was utilised to test the psychometric properties of the PTOS-ID-II using data collected from routine clinical practice from adults with intellectual disabilities (n = 879) accessing a community health service. Subsequent analyses included dimensionality reduction (via principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis), assessment of internal consistency, concurrent validity and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Analyses were guided by a primer on the development of health outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exploration of the proposed factor structure of the PTOS-ID-II indicated that two of the items were problematic and subsequently removed. The new 27-item measure was rebranded 'the Outcomes for Wellbeing and Distress Scale' (OWLS-ID). Analysis of the measure identified and confirmed a three-component model: (1) Positive Well-being, (2) Emotional and Behavioural Discomfort and (3) Anxiety. Internal consistency was good to acceptable. Items related to Emotional and Behavioural Discomfort and Anxiety were combined to create a measure of psychological distress. Concurrent validity between distress as measured using the OWLS-ID and Brief Symptoms Inventory was strong. A cut of 11.5 had acceptable sensitivity (0.85) and specificity (0.9). Analysis of missing data suggested that item acceptability was high.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OWLS-ID is one of the most comprehensively tested patient-reported outcome measures to date, which was developed specifically for individuals with an intellectual disability. Its implications for clinical practice and future research are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":"653-663"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Psychological Therapies Outcome Scale-Intellectual Disabilities-II (PTOS-ID-II) is a 29-item self-report measure developed to assess psychological distress and positive well-being in people with an intellectual disability. While initial validation demonstrated promising psychometric properties, further replication in a larger sample was needed, and incorporating insights gained from routine clinical use over the years since its initial implementation.
Method: A quantitative cross-sectional design was utilised to test the psychometric properties of the PTOS-ID-II using data collected from routine clinical practice from adults with intellectual disabilities (n = 879) accessing a community health service. Subsequent analyses included dimensionality reduction (via principal component analysis and confirmatory factor analysis), assessment of internal consistency, concurrent validity and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Analyses were guided by a primer on the development of health outcome measures.
Results: Exploration of the proposed factor structure of the PTOS-ID-II indicated that two of the items were problematic and subsequently removed. The new 27-item measure was rebranded 'the Outcomes for Wellbeing and Distress Scale' (OWLS-ID). Analysis of the measure identified and confirmed a three-component model: (1) Positive Well-being, (2) Emotional and Behavioural Discomfort and (3) Anxiety. Internal consistency was good to acceptable. Items related to Emotional and Behavioural Discomfort and Anxiety were combined to create a measure of psychological distress. Concurrent validity between distress as measured using the OWLS-ID and Brief Symptoms Inventory was strong. A cut of 11.5 had acceptable sensitivity (0.85) and specificity (0.9). Analysis of missing data suggested that item acceptability was high.
Conclusion: The OWLS-ID is one of the most comprehensively tested patient-reported outcome measures to date, which was developed specifically for individuals with an intellectual disability. Its implications for clinical practice and future research are discussed.
背景:心理治疗结局量表-智力残疾- ii (PTOS-ID-II)是一种29项自我报告量表,用于评估智力残疾患者的心理困扰和积极幸福感。虽然最初的验证显示了有希望的心理测量特性,但需要在更大的样本中进一步复制,并结合自最初实施以来多年来从常规临床使用中获得的见解。方法:采用定量横断面设计,利用从获得社区卫生服务的智力残疾成人(n = 879)的常规临床实践中收集的数据,对PTOS-ID-II的心理测量特性进行测试。随后的分析包括降维(通过主成分分析和验证性因子分析)、内部一致性评估、并发效度和接受者操作特征分析。分析工作以制定健康结果指标为指导。结果:对PTOS-ID-II的拟议因子结构的探索表明,其中两个项目有问题,随后被删除。新的27项测量被重新命名为“幸福与痛苦结果量表”(OWLS-ID)。对测量结果的分析确定并确认了一个三成分模型:(1)积极幸福感,(2)情绪和行为不适,(3)焦虑。内部一致性好到可以接受。与情绪和行为不适以及焦虑相关的项目被结合起来,形成了一种心理困扰的测量方法。使用OWLS-ID和简短症状量表测量的痛苦之间的并发效度很强。11.5的切口具有可接受的敏感性(0.85)和特异性(0.9)。对缺失数据的分析表明,项目可接受性很高。结论:OWLS-ID是迄今为止测试最全面的患者报告的结果测量之一,它是专门为智力残疾患者开发的。讨论了其对临床实践和未来研究的意义。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.