Qinglong Yang, Haolin Chen, Nan Luo, Hanyuan Lin, Haoxian Tang, Zexuan Liu, Jingtao Huang, Xuan Zhang, Gaoming Hou, Wenqiang Liao, Xuxia Sui, Qingtao Yang
{"title":"Food ultra-processing, plant-origin foods, and risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia: evidence from the UK Biobank cohort.","authors":"Qinglong Yang, Haolin Chen, Nan Luo, Hanyuan Lin, Haoxian Tang, Zexuan Liu, Jingtao Huang, Xuan Zhang, Gaoming Hou, Wenqiang Liao, Xuxia Sui, Qingtao Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12937-026-01310-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) frequently affects men in middle and later life; however, the potential influence of ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and the metabolic pathways involved has not been fully elucidated. This study investigated associations between the percentage of total food weight (% of total g/day) contributed by foods stratified by processing level and plant origin and the risk of BPH. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 77,951 men aged ≥ 45 years from the UK Biobank, with a median follow-up of 10.5 years. Dietary intake was assessed using repeated 24-hour dietary recalls and expressed as the percentage of total food weight (% of total g/day) from all UPF, plant-sourced UPF, plant-sourced non-UPF, and all plant-sourced foods. Incident BPH (n = 7,387) was identified using ICD-10 codes. Associations were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models, stratified analyses, restricted cubic splines, and sensitivity analyses. Mediation analysis assessed 251 metabolites as potential mediators of the association between the percentage of total food weight from all UPF and BPH. RESULTS: In the fully adjusted model (Model 3), each 10% increase in the percentage of total food weight from all UPF was associated with a 4% higher risk of BPH (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.06). A similar 10% increase in plant-sourced UPF was associated with a 3% higher BPH risk (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.06). Conversely, each 10% increase in the percentage of total food weight from plant-sourced non-UPF and all plant-sourced foods was associated with a 5% and 9% lower risk of BPH, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analyses indicated a significant non-linear inverse association between the percentage of total food weight from plant-sourced non-UPF and BPH risk. Mediation analyses identified high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-related metabolites as key mediators linking the percentage of total food weight from all UPF to BPH development. CONCLUSION: A higher percentage of total food weight from UPF was associated with a higher risk of incident BPH among middle-aged and older men, with HDL-related metabolites partially mediating this association. These findings support the potential benefit of reducing UPF and increasing plant-sourced non-UPF, without implying causality. </p>","PeriodicalId":19203,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13101332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-026-01310-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) frequently affects men in middle and later life; however, the potential influence of ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption and the metabolic pathways involved has not been fully elucidated. This study investigated associations between the percentage of total food weight (% of total g/day) contributed by foods stratified by processing level and plant origin and the risk of BPH. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 77,951 men aged ≥ 45 years from the UK Biobank, with a median follow-up of 10.5 years. Dietary intake was assessed using repeated 24-hour dietary recalls and expressed as the percentage of total food weight (% of total g/day) from all UPF, plant-sourced UPF, plant-sourced non-UPF, and all plant-sourced foods. Incident BPH (n = 7,387) was identified using ICD-10 codes. Associations were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models, stratified analyses, restricted cubic splines, and sensitivity analyses. Mediation analysis assessed 251 metabolites as potential mediators of the association between the percentage of total food weight from all UPF and BPH. RESULTS: In the fully adjusted model (Model 3), each 10% increase in the percentage of total food weight from all UPF was associated with a 4% higher risk of BPH (hazard ratio [HR] 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.06). A similar 10% increase in plant-sourced UPF was associated with a 3% higher BPH risk (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01–1.06). Conversely, each 10% increase in the percentage of total food weight from plant-sourced non-UPF and all plant-sourced foods was associated with a 5% and 9% lower risk of BPH, respectively. Restricted cubic spline analyses indicated a significant non-linear inverse association between the percentage of total food weight from plant-sourced non-UPF and BPH risk. Mediation analyses identified high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-related metabolites as key mediators linking the percentage of total food weight from all UPF to BPH development. CONCLUSION: A higher percentage of total food weight from UPF was associated with a higher risk of incident BPH among middle-aged and older men, with HDL-related metabolites partially mediating this association. These findings support the potential benefit of reducing UPF and increasing plant-sourced non-UPF, without implying causality.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition Journal publishes surveillance, epidemiologic, and intervention research that sheds light on i) influences (e.g., familial, environmental) on eating patterns; ii) associations between eating patterns and health, and iii) strategies to improve eating patterns among populations. The journal also welcomes manuscripts reporting on the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) and feasibility of methods (e.g., for assessing dietary intake) for human nutrition research. In addition, study protocols for controlled trials and cohort studies, with an emphasis on methods for assessing dietary exposures and outcomes as well as intervention components, will be considered.
Manuscripts that consider eating patterns holistically, as opposed to solely reductionist approaches that focus on specific dietary components in isolation, are encouraged. Also encouraged are papers that take a holistic or systems perspective in attempting to understand possible compensatory and differential effects of nutrition interventions. The journal does not consider animal studies.
In addition to the influence of eating patterns for human health, we also invite research providing insights into the environmental sustainability of dietary practices. Again, a holistic perspective is encouraged, for example, through the consideration of how eating patterns might maximize both human and planetary health.