Cannabis Expectancies for Sleep Modulate Discrepancies Between Subjective and Objective Sleep Outcomes: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Nicholas R Livingston, Kyle De Young, Audrey Merwin, Alison Looby
{"title":"Cannabis Expectancies for Sleep Modulate Discrepancies Between Subjective and Objective Sleep Outcomes: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Nicholas R Livingston, Kyle De Young, Audrey Merwin, Alison Looby","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2026.2644855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While cannabis use is associated with subjective sleep improvements, studies employing objective sleep measures (e.g. actigraphy) demonstrate mixed relations. Based on social cognitive theory, it is possible that positive sleep-related cannabis expectancies (i.e. beliefs that cannabis will improve sleep) may modify self-reported sleep outcomes. This daily-level study examined agreement between subjective and objective sleep measures and evaluated whether positive sleep-related cannabis expectancies augmented discrepancies between subjective and objective sleep outcomes on cannabis use days. Individuals endorsing regular cannabis use and sleep motives (<i>N</i> = 23) completed baseline measures on cannabis use, sleep, and expectancies, followed by up to seven days of diaries and continuous actigraphy (<i>n</i> = 155 days). Diary and actigraphy agreement was poor for wake after sleep onset and sleep onset latency, moderate for total sleep time, and excellent for fall asleep time and wake-time. Expectancies were associated with overestimated diary total sleep time and this association was amplified on cannabis use days. Tendencies to self-report earlier diary fall asleep time on cannabis use days and later time on nonuse days were amplified as expectancies increased. Sleep-related cannabis expectancies may bias self-reported sleep, highlighting the need to account for such beliefs in future research examining cannabis-sleep relations with subjective measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2026.2644855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While cannabis use is associated with subjective sleep improvements, studies employing objective sleep measures (e.g. actigraphy) demonstrate mixed relations. Based on social cognitive theory, it is possible that positive sleep-related cannabis expectancies (i.e. beliefs that cannabis will improve sleep) may modify self-reported sleep outcomes. This daily-level study examined agreement between subjective and objective sleep measures and evaluated whether positive sleep-related cannabis expectancies augmented discrepancies between subjective and objective sleep outcomes on cannabis use days. Individuals endorsing regular cannabis use and sleep motives (N = 23) completed baseline measures on cannabis use, sleep, and expectancies, followed by up to seven days of diaries and continuous actigraphy (n = 155 days). Diary and actigraphy agreement was poor for wake after sleep onset and sleep onset latency, moderate for total sleep time, and excellent for fall asleep time and wake-time. Expectancies were associated with overestimated diary total sleep time and this association was amplified on cannabis use days. Tendencies to self-report earlier diary fall asleep time on cannabis use days and later time on nonuse days were amplified as expectancies increased. Sleep-related cannabis expectancies may bias self-reported sleep, highlighting the need to account for such beliefs in future research examining cannabis-sleep relations with subjective measures.

大麻对主观和客观睡眠结果之间睡眠调节差异的预期:一项初步研究。
虽然大麻使用与主观睡眠改善有关,但采用客观睡眠测量(如活动记录仪)的研究表明,两者之间存在复杂的关系。根据社会认知理论,积极的与睡眠有关的大麻预期(即大麻会改善睡眠的信念)可能会改变自我报告的睡眠结果。这项日常水平的研究检查了主观和客观睡眠测量之间的一致性,并评估了积极的睡眠相关大麻预期是否会增加大麻使用日主观和客观睡眠结果之间的差异。支持定期使用大麻和睡眠动机的个体(N = 23)完成了关于大麻使用、睡眠和预期的基线测量,随后进行了长达7天的日记和连续活动记录(N = 155天)。日记和活动记录仪在睡眠开始后醒来和睡眠开始潜伏期方面的一致性较差,在总睡眠时间方面的一致性中等,在入睡时间和清醒时间方面的一致性很好。预期与高估的日记总睡眠时间有关,这种关联在使用大麻的日子里被放大。随着期望的增加,在使用大麻的日子里,自我报告更早的日记入睡时间和在不使用大麻的日子里更晚的时间的倾向被放大了。与睡眠有关的大麻预期可能会对自我报告的睡眠产生偏差,这突出表明,在未来的研究中,需要用主观的方法来检验大麻与睡眠的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书