Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Comprehensive Review.

IF 7.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brandon J Bond, Mirjana Djakovic, Ronak H Jani, John T Tsiang, Anthony W Kam, David P Pasquale, Joseph C Serrone
{"title":"Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Neuroendovascular Procedures: A Comprehensive Review.","authors":"Brandon J Bond, Mirjana Djakovic, Ronak H Jani, John T Tsiang, Anthony W Kam, David P Pasquale, Joseph C Serrone","doi":"10.1007/s11910-026-01482-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Infection after neuroendovascular procedures is rare, yet practice around antibiotic prophylaxis varies widely. This review appraises evidence regarding prophylactic antibiotics in diagnostic cerebral angiography and therapeutic neuroendovascular interventions, compares practice patterns with interventional radiology and interventional cardiology, and summarizes major society guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Across published series totaling approximately 30,000 neuroendovascular procedures, infection rates ranged from 0 to 0.4%, with no measurable difference between procedures performed with or without prophylactic antibiotics. Infections were predominantly minor and limited to access sites. Comparative data from interventional cardiology and interventional radiology show similarly low infection rates. Professional guidelines uniformly discourage routine antibiotic prophylaxis in clean vascular procedures as well as diagnostic angiography, recommending selective use only in clearly defined high-risk patients. Routine pre-procedural antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for diagnostic cerebral angiography or for most clean therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures (including coiling/stenting/flow diversion) in the absence of specific high-risk features. Selective prophylaxis may be considered for clearly high-risk patients or situations. </p>","PeriodicalId":10831,"journal":{"name":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-026-01482-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Infection after neuroendovascular procedures is rare, yet practice around antibiotic prophylaxis varies widely. This review appraises evidence regarding prophylactic antibiotics in diagnostic cerebral angiography and therapeutic neuroendovascular interventions, compares practice patterns with interventional radiology and interventional cardiology, and summarizes major society guidelines. RECENT FINDINGS: Across published series totaling approximately 30,000 neuroendovascular procedures, infection rates ranged from 0 to 0.4%, with no measurable difference between procedures performed with or without prophylactic antibiotics. Infections were predominantly minor and limited to access sites. Comparative data from interventional cardiology and interventional radiology show similarly low infection rates. Professional guidelines uniformly discourage routine antibiotic prophylaxis in clean vascular procedures as well as diagnostic angiography, recommending selective use only in clearly defined high-risk patients. Routine pre-procedural antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended for diagnostic cerebral angiography or for most clean therapeutic neuroendovascular procedures (including coiling/stenting/flow diversion) in the absence of specific high-risk features. Selective prophylaxis may be considered for clearly high-risk patients or situations.

神经血管内手术中的抗生素预防:综合综述。
综述的目的:神经血管内手术后的感染是罕见的,但围绕抗生素预防的实践差异很大。本文综述了预防性抗生素在诊断性脑血管造影和治疗性神经血管内介入治疗中的应用,比较了介入放射学和介入心脏病学的实践模式,并总结了主要的社会指南。最近的研究发现:在已发表的总计约30,000例神经血管内手术中,感染率从0到0.4%不等,在使用或不使用预防性抗生素的手术中没有可测量的差异。感染主要是轻微的,并且仅限于接入点。来自介入性心脏病学和介入性放射学的比较数据显示同样低的感染率。专业指南一致反对在清洁血管手术和诊断性血管造影中常规预防抗生素,建议仅在明确定义的高危患者中选择性使用。在没有特定高危特征的情况下,不建议诊断性脑血管造影或大多数干净的治疗性神经血管内手术(包括盘绕/支架植入/血流转移)常规术前预防抗生素。对于明显的高危患者或情况,可考虑选择性预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of neurological disease and disorders. Presents the views of experts on current advances in neurology and neuroscience Gathers and synthesizes important recent papers on the topic Includes reviews of recently published clinical trials, valuable web sites, and commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书