An open label investigation of the feasibility and effectiveness of Memory Boost: A novel brief group cognitive remediation intervention for adults with mixed mood and anxiety disorders.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Catherine Bosyj, Jelena P King, Christina Gojmerac, Bruno Losier, Heather E McNeely
{"title":"An open label investigation of the feasibility and effectiveness of Memory Boost: A novel brief group cognitive remediation intervention for adults with mixed mood and anxiety disorders.","authors":"Catherine Bosyj, Jelena P King, Christina Gojmerac, Bruno Losier, Heather E McNeely","doi":"10.1111/jnp.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel group cognitive remediation (Memory Boost) designed to improve memory in an adult mixed mood and anxiety disorder population. A secondary aim was to explore the relationship between mood symptoms and performance on subjective and objective memory measures. Participants were adults (n = 99) being treated for a primary diagnosis of a mood disorder in an ambulatory mental health and addictions program who completed Memory Boost between 2014 and 2020. Assessments were completed pre- and post-intervention using self-report measures of mood, anxiety and stress, subjective memory difficulties, confidence in memory and use of memory strategies. Selected subtests of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test were administered as objective measures of memory. Over 76% of the sample was retained to post-group test completion. There were significant improvements on subjective measures of memory satisfaction, capability, use of strategies and frequency of mistakes; no significant changes in objective memory performance were observed. Significant improvements were noted in self-reported ratings of depression symptoms, with a significant positive correlation noted between changes in subjective memory and mood improvement. Results indicate that participation in Memory Boost was feasible and associated with improved subjective perception of memory and increased use of cognitive compensatory strategies in a mixed diagnosis adult mood and anxiety disorder sample. Improvement in self-reported mood was also noted and positively correlated with changes in subjective memory, suggesting that a brief cognitive remediation intervention may be a feasible and effective adjunct therapy to mood disorders treatment as usual.</p>","PeriodicalId":197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.70038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a novel group cognitive remediation (Memory Boost) designed to improve memory in an adult mixed mood and anxiety disorder population. A secondary aim was to explore the relationship between mood symptoms and performance on subjective and objective memory measures. Participants were adults (n = 99) being treated for a primary diagnosis of a mood disorder in an ambulatory mental health and addictions program who completed Memory Boost between 2014 and 2020. Assessments were completed pre- and post-intervention using self-report measures of mood, anxiety and stress, subjective memory difficulties, confidence in memory and use of memory strategies. Selected subtests of the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test were administered as objective measures of memory. Over 76% of the sample was retained to post-group test completion. There were significant improvements on subjective measures of memory satisfaction, capability, use of strategies and frequency of mistakes; no significant changes in objective memory performance were observed. Significant improvements were noted in self-reported ratings of depression symptoms, with a significant positive correlation noted between changes in subjective memory and mood improvement. Results indicate that participation in Memory Boost was feasible and associated with improved subjective perception of memory and increased use of cognitive compensatory strategies in a mixed diagnosis adult mood and anxiety disorder sample. Improvement in self-reported mood was also noted and positively correlated with changes in subjective memory, suggesting that a brief cognitive remediation intervention may be a feasible and effective adjunct therapy to mood disorders treatment as usual.

一项关于记忆促进的可行性和有效性的开放标签调查:一种针对成人混合性情绪和焦虑障碍的新型简短群体认知修复干预。
评估一种新的群体认知修复(记忆促进)的可行性和有效性,旨在改善成人混合性情绪和焦虑障碍人群的记忆。第二个目的是探讨情绪症状与主观和客观记忆测量表现之间的关系。参与者是成年人(n = 99),他们在2014年至2020年期间完成了记忆增强项目,在门诊心理健康和成瘾项目中接受了情绪障碍的初步诊断。评估是在干预前和干预后使用情绪、焦虑和压力、主观记忆困难、记忆信心和记忆策略使用的自我报告测量完成的。Rivermead行为记忆测试的选定子测试作为记忆的客观测量进行管理。超过76%的样本被保留到组后测试完成。在记忆满意度、能力、策略使用和错误频率的主观测量方面有显著改善;客观记忆表现无明显变化。自我报告的抑郁症状评分显著改善,主观记忆变化与情绪改善之间存在显著正相关。结果表明,在混合诊断成人情绪和焦虑障碍样本中,参与记忆增强是可行的,并且与改善主观记忆感知和增加认知补偿策略的使用有关。自我报告情绪的改善也被注意到,并且与主观记忆的变化正相关,这表明短暂的认知修复干预可能是一种可行且有效的辅助治疗,以常规的方式治疗情绪障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuropsychology
Journal of Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuropsychology publishes original contributions to scientific knowledge in neuropsychology including: • clinical and research studies with neurological, psychiatric and psychological patient populations in all age groups • behavioural or pharmacological treatment regimes • cognitive experimentation and neuroimaging • multidisciplinary approach embracing areas such as developmental psychology, neurology, psychiatry, physiology, endocrinology, pharmacology and imaging science The following types of paper are invited: • papers reporting original empirical investigations • theoretical papers; provided that these are sufficiently related to empirical data • review articles, which need not be exhaustive, but which should give an interpretation of the state of research in a given field and, where appropriate, identify its clinical implications • brief reports and comments • case reports • fast-track papers (included in the issue following acceptation) reaction and rebuttals (short reactions to publications in JNP followed by an invited rebuttal of the original authors) • special issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书