The effect of recommendation display position on review persuasiveness: Moderating roles of temporal distance, affect, and valence

IF 8.9 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Journal of Retailing Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jretai.2025.09.002
Subhash Jha , M.S. Balaji , Abhijit Guha , Abhijit Biswas , Eric W.K. See-To , Prashanth Ravula
{"title":"The effect of recommendation display position on review persuasiveness: Moderating roles of temporal distance, affect, and valence","authors":"Subhash Jha ,&nbsp;M.S. Balaji ,&nbsp;Abhijit Guha ,&nbsp;Abhijit Biswas ,&nbsp;Eric W.K. See-To ,&nbsp;Prashanth Ravula","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2025.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper examines how the display position of the recommendation (e.g., “I recommend…”) in a positive review influences its persuasiveness. Specifically, we propose that recommendations displayed at the top (vs. bottom) of positive reviews are more persuasive, because displaying the recommendation at the top (vs. bottom) increases processing fluency and thus increases review persuasiveness. The observed effects are mitigated (i) when the temporal distance associated with the decision increases, (ii) for relatively cognitive decisions, and (iii) when the review valence is negative. We test the above propositions across multiple experimental studies and across differing types of recommendations. This research proposes contributions not only to theory relating to online reviews, display effects, and processing fluency but also to practice, namely, how firms should elicit and display recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":"102 1","pages":"Pages 165-183"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435925000958","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines how the display position of the recommendation (e.g., “I recommend…”) in a positive review influences its persuasiveness. Specifically, we propose that recommendations displayed at the top (vs. bottom) of positive reviews are more persuasive, because displaying the recommendation at the top (vs. bottom) increases processing fluency and thus increases review persuasiveness. The observed effects are mitigated (i) when the temporal distance associated with the decision increases, (ii) for relatively cognitive decisions, and (iii) when the review valence is negative. We test the above propositions across multiple experimental studies and across differing types of recommendations. This research proposes contributions not only to theory relating to online reviews, display effects, and processing fluency but also to practice, namely, how firms should elicit and display recommendations.
推荐展示位置对评论说服力的影响:时间距离、情感和效价的调节作用
本文考察了正面评论中推荐的展示位置(如“我推荐……”)对其说服力的影响。具体来说,我们认为在正面评论的顶部(相对于底部)显示的推荐更有说服力,因为在顶部(相对于底部)显示的推荐增加了处理流畅性,从而增加了评论的说服力。当与决策相关的时间距离增加时,(ii)对于相对认知的决策,以及(iii)当回顾效价为负时,所观察到的影响会减轻。我们通过多个实验研究和不同类型的建议来检验上述命题。这项研究不仅提出了与在线评论、显示效果和处理流畅性有关的理论,而且还提出了实践方面的贡献,即公司应该如何引出和显示推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书