Trends in testing effect research: from lab to classroom, but not yet for all learners.

IF 4.3 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Thomas Wilschut, Florian Sense, Hedderik van Rijn
{"title":"Trends in testing effect research: from lab to classroom, but not yet for all learners.","authors":"Thomas Wilschut, Florian Sense, Hedderik van Rijn","doi":"10.1038/s41539-026-00400-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Active retrieval leads to better learning outcomes than passive study. This perspective, in which we analyze 23,850 publications, reveals an increasing focus on the educational applications of this testing effect but limited attention to subpopulations with learning disabilities. Using dyslexia as a case study, we identify theoretical grounds to question whether testing effects generalize universally, highlighting the need for empirical research. Future research should examine benefits of testing in neurodiverse learners to develop tailored interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48503,"journal":{"name":"npj Science of Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13103398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Science of Learning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00400-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Active retrieval leads to better learning outcomes than passive study. This perspective, in which we analyze 23,850 publications, reveals an increasing focus on the educational applications of this testing effect but limited attention to subpopulations with learning disabilities. Using dyslexia as a case study, we identify theoretical grounds to question whether testing effects generalize universally, highlighting the need for empirical research. Future research should examine benefits of testing in neurodiverse learners to develop tailored interventions.

测试效果研究的趋势:从实验室到课堂,但尚未适用于所有学习者。
主动检索比被动检索的学习效果更好。从这个角度来看,我们分析了23,850份出版物,揭示了越来越多的关注这种测试效果的教育应用,但对有学习障碍的亚群体的关注有限。以阅读障碍为例,我们确定了质疑测试效果是否普遍适用的理论依据,强调了实证研究的必要性。未来的研究应该检查在神经多样性学习者中测试的好处,以开发量身定制的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书