Bidirectional Relationships between Peer Victimization, Loneliness and Solitude in Adolescence: A Systematic Review

IF 8.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
E. González-Abaurrea, J. González-Cabrera, J. Ortega-Barón, R. Escortell, J. M. Machimbarrena
{"title":"Bidirectional Relationships between Peer Victimization, Loneliness and Solitude in Adolescence: A Systematic Review","authors":"E. González-Abaurrea,&nbsp;J. González-Cabrera,&nbsp;J. Ortega-Barón,&nbsp;R. Escortell,&nbsp;J. M. Machimbarrena","doi":"10.1007/s40894-025-00266-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bullying victimization and cyberbullying victimization are pervasive phenomena with documented adverse psychological consequences. Although loneliness has been conceptualized as both an antecedent and outcome of victimization experiences, the nature of these relationships remains insufficiently understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the relationships between bullying victimization, cyberbullying victimization, and loneliness, while examining conceptualizations and assessment of loneliness. Following PRISMA guidelines, 7253 articles were evaluated, including 100 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Selected studies included samples from a variety of countries, balanced in terms of gender and with ages ranging from childhood to adulthood. Most studies emphasized loneliness as distress arising from perceived deficiencies in social relationships, with measurement approaches varying considerably. The findings reveal complex, bidirectional relationships between victimization and loneliness, with stronger associations in adolescent samples compared to younger children or adults. While traditional bullying consistently demonstrated significant associations with loneliness, the cyberbullying-loneliness relationship showed greater variability. Some factors such as bystander behaviour or school connectedness moderated this relationship, being this protective effect stronger for girls. This review identifies critical gaps in understanding how different forms of loneliness interact with victimization across developmental stages and cultural contexts, providing a foundation for designing targeted interventions that address loneliness in victimized youth, particularly during adolescence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"195 - 247"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40894-025-00266-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-025-00266-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bullying victimization and cyberbullying victimization are pervasive phenomena with documented adverse psychological consequences. Although loneliness has been conceptualized as both an antecedent and outcome of victimization experiences, the nature of these relationships remains insufficiently understood. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on the relationships between bullying victimization, cyberbullying victimization, and loneliness, while examining conceptualizations and assessment of loneliness. Following PRISMA guidelines, 7253 articles were evaluated, including 100 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Selected studies included samples from a variety of countries, balanced in terms of gender and with ages ranging from childhood to adulthood. Most studies emphasized loneliness as distress arising from perceived deficiencies in social relationships, with measurement approaches varying considerably. The findings reveal complex, bidirectional relationships between victimization and loneliness, with stronger associations in adolescent samples compared to younger children or adults. While traditional bullying consistently demonstrated significant associations with loneliness, the cyberbullying-loneliness relationship showed greater variability. Some factors such as bystander behaviour or school connectedness moderated this relationship, being this protective effect stronger for girls. This review identifies critical gaps in understanding how different forms of loneliness interact with victimization across developmental stages and cultural contexts, providing a foundation for designing targeted interventions that address loneliness in victimized youth, particularly during adolescence.

青少年同伴伤害、孤独感和孤独的双向关系:系统回顾
欺凌受害者和网络欺凌受害者是普遍存在的现象,具有文献记载的不良心理后果。尽管孤独已经被概念化为受害经历的前提和结果,但这些关系的本质仍然没有得到充分的理解。本系统综述综合了欺凌受害、网络欺凌受害和孤独感之间关系的证据,同时考察了孤独感的概念和评估。按照PRISMA指南,7253篇文章被评估,其中100篇研究符合纳入标准。选定的研究包括来自不同国家的样本,在性别和年龄方面平衡,从童年到成年。大多数研究强调孤独是由于社会关系中感知到的缺陷而引起的痛苦,测量方法差异很大。研究结果揭示了受害和孤独之间复杂的双向关系,与年幼的儿童或成年人相比,青少年样本中的关联更强。传统霸凌与孤独感之间的关系一直表现出显著的相关性,而网络霸凌与孤独感之间的关系则表现出更大的变异性。旁观者行为或学校联系等因素缓和了这种关系,对女孩的保护作用更强。本综述确定了在理解不同形式的孤独如何在不同的发展阶段和文化背景下与受害相互作用方面的关键差距,为设计有针对性的干预措施提供了基础,以解决受害青年,特别是青春期的孤独感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adolescent Research Review
Adolescent Research Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence.  The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.  Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书