Biodiversity conservation and contestations over land: Jihadist expansion in West Africa

IF 4.8 1区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
World Development Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107375
Leif Brottem , Matthew Turner
{"title":"Biodiversity conservation and contestations over land: Jihadist expansion in West Africa","authors":"Leif Brottem ,&nbsp;Matthew Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Protected areas in Africa are sites of resource-related grievances and are located within socio-ecological landscapes where insurgent groups have increasingly operated. The connection between insurgency and protected areas is widely seen as resulting from resistance to coercive conservation, or from the role that protected areas serve as insurgent refuges. Research in Benin’s National Park W reveals that its emergence as a site of insurgency is shaped less by current grievances or refuge than by new forms of power that are grounded in histories of inter-group competition and changes in resource availability within a broader socio-ecological landscape. Long-term fieldwork shows how these landscape-level changes have intersected with different modes of park management to influence relations between managers and livestock herders which have in turn created opportunities for insurgents. Our analysis reveals two contrasting channels through which conservation zoning has shaped insurgent-local relations. The first involves resource users resisting expulsion from wildlife protection areas. The second involves users who align with insurgents to defend rights they have obtained through official park management policy. This channel demonstrates that attempts by managers to accommodate local needs can inadvertently produce new kinds of insurgent-local relationships through a combination of strict territorial management and ambiguous rights in special use zones. These findings point to a more complex etiology of how protected areas become sites of insurgency, highlighting the importance of the interaction of landscape-level resource competition and changing relations between conservation managers and rural inhabitants over time.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 107375"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X26000641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protected areas in Africa are sites of resource-related grievances and are located within socio-ecological landscapes where insurgent groups have increasingly operated. The connection between insurgency and protected areas is widely seen as resulting from resistance to coercive conservation, or from the role that protected areas serve as insurgent refuges. Research in Benin’s National Park W reveals that its emergence as a site of insurgency is shaped less by current grievances or refuge than by new forms of power that are grounded in histories of inter-group competition and changes in resource availability within a broader socio-ecological landscape. Long-term fieldwork shows how these landscape-level changes have intersected with different modes of park management to influence relations between managers and livestock herders which have in turn created opportunities for insurgents. Our analysis reveals two contrasting channels through which conservation zoning has shaped insurgent-local relations. The first involves resource users resisting expulsion from wildlife protection areas. The second involves users who align with insurgents to defend rights they have obtained through official park management policy. This channel demonstrates that attempts by managers to accommodate local needs can inadvertently produce new kinds of insurgent-local relationships through a combination of strict territorial management and ambiguous rights in special use zones. These findings point to a more complex etiology of how protected areas become sites of insurgency, highlighting the importance of the interaction of landscape-level resource competition and changing relations between conservation managers and rural inhabitants over time.
生物多样性保护和土地争端:圣战分子在西非的扩张
非洲的保护区是与资源有关的不满的场所,并且位于叛乱组织日益活跃的社会生态景观中。人们普遍认为,叛乱分子与保护区之间的联系源于对强制保护的抵制,或者源于保护区充当叛乱分子避难所的角色。在贝宁国家公园W的研究表明,它作为一个叛乱地点的出现与其说是由于当前的不满或避难,不如说是由于建立在更广泛的社会生态景观中群体间竞争和资源可用性变化的历史基础上的新形式的权力。长期的田野调查表明,这些景观层面的变化如何与公园管理的不同模式相交叉,影响管理者和牲畜牧民之间的关系,从而为叛乱分子创造了机会。我们的分析揭示了两种截然不同的渠道,通过这两种渠道,保护分区形成了叛乱分子与地方的关系。第一种是资源使用者拒绝被驱逐出野生动物保护区。第二种情况涉及与叛乱分子结盟的用户,以捍卫他们通过官方公园管理政策获得的权利。这一渠道表明,管理者为满足当地需求所做的努力,可能会通过严格的领土管理和特殊使用区域的模糊权利相结合,在不经意间产生新型的叛乱-地方关系。这些发现指出了保护区如何成为叛乱场所的更复杂的病因,突出了景观级资源竞争和保护管理者与农村居民之间不断变化的关系之间相互作用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Development
World Development Multiple-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
320
期刊介绍: World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书