Effort-based decision making in psychopathology: A transdiagnostic multilevel meta-analysis and systematic review of behavioral patterns and mechanisms underlying amotivational psychopathology.

IF 19.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Matthias Pillny,Katharina E Renz,Alina Hay,Daniel Fulford,Tania M Lincoln,Deanna M Barch,James M Gold,Stefan Kaiser
{"title":"Effort-based decision making in psychopathology: A transdiagnostic multilevel meta-analysis and systematic review of behavioral patterns and mechanisms underlying amotivational psychopathology.","authors":"Matthias Pillny,Katharina E Renz,Alina Hay,Daniel Fulford,Tania M Lincoln,Deanna M Barch,James M Gold,Stefan Kaiser","doi":"10.1037/bul0000510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effort-based decision making (EBDM) is fundamental to motivation. This cognitive process weighs the effort required to obtain a reward against its magnitude and the probability of obtaining it. Research suggests both transdiagnostic and disorder-specific patterns and mechanisms of EBDM in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and those at risk for these conditions. This preregistered meta-analysis (CRD42022344605) aimed to quantify EBDM across these conditions compared to healthy controls and examine mechanisms underlying altered effort allocation. PubMed, APA PsycInfo, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for eligible studies. We synthesized 115 effect sizes from 68 studies (N = 3,697). Three-level random-effects meta-analyses revealed moderate deficits in EBDM across schizophrenia spectrum disorders (g = -0.40) and bipolar disorder (g = -0.39), a smaller impairment in major depressive disorder (g = -0.28), and no significant reductions in at-risk samples (g = -0.01). Altered effort allocation patterns were marked by reduced effort exertion across increasing reward and probability conditions, with schizophrenia spectrum disorders showing the most pronounced deficits. The most robust moderators were the number of probability conditions, ethnicity, gender, and the severity of positive and negative symptoms. A narrative synthesis of computational modeling studies indicated that maladaptive EBDM may reflect increased effort sensitivity, reduced reward sensitivity, and cognitive impairment, with variations across disorders. Whereas schizophrenia spectrum disorders are associated with unsystematic effort allocation and cognitive deficits, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder show heightened effort sensitivity. Overall, findings point to both shared and disorder-specific mechanisms of EBDM, offering directions for targeted interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":20854,"journal":{"name":"Psychological bulletin","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000510","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effort-based decision making (EBDM) is fundamental to motivation. This cognitive process weighs the effort required to obtain a reward against its magnitude and the probability of obtaining it. Research suggests both transdiagnostic and disorder-specific patterns and mechanisms of EBDM in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and those at risk for these conditions. This preregistered meta-analysis (CRD42022344605) aimed to quantify EBDM across these conditions compared to healthy controls and examine mechanisms underlying altered effort allocation. PubMed, APA PsycInfo, Embase, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched for eligible studies. We synthesized 115 effect sizes from 68 studies (N = 3,697). Three-level random-effects meta-analyses revealed moderate deficits in EBDM across schizophrenia spectrum disorders (g = -0.40) and bipolar disorder (g = -0.39), a smaller impairment in major depressive disorder (g = -0.28), and no significant reductions in at-risk samples (g = -0.01). Altered effort allocation patterns were marked by reduced effort exertion across increasing reward and probability conditions, with schizophrenia spectrum disorders showing the most pronounced deficits. The most robust moderators were the number of probability conditions, ethnicity, gender, and the severity of positive and negative symptoms. A narrative synthesis of computational modeling studies indicated that maladaptive EBDM may reflect increased effort sensitivity, reduced reward sensitivity, and cognitive impairment, with variations across disorders. Whereas schizophrenia spectrum disorders are associated with unsystematic effort allocation and cognitive deficits, major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder show heightened effort sensitivity. Overall, findings point to both shared and disorder-specific mechanisms of EBDM, offering directions for targeted interventions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
精神病理学中基于努力的决策:动机性精神病理学行为模式和机制的跨诊断多水平荟萃分析和系统综述。
基于努力的决策(EBDM)是动机的基础。这个认知过程会权衡获得奖励所需付出的努力与获得奖励的大小和可能性。研究表明,在精神分裂症谱系障碍、重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍和有这些疾病风险的个体中,EBDM存在跨诊断和疾病特异性模式和机制。这项预注册的荟萃分析(CRD42022344605)旨在量化这些条件下与健康对照组相比的EBDM,并检查改变的努力分配的机制。系统地检索PubMed、APA PsycInfo、Embase和Web of Science数据库,寻找符合条件的研究。我们综合了来自68项研究的115个效应量(N = 3,697)。三水平随机效应荟萃分析显示,在精神分裂症谱系障碍(g = -0.40)和双相情感障碍(g = -0.39)中,EBDM有中度缺陷,在重度抑郁症中,EBDM有较小的缺陷(g = -0.28),在高危样本中,EBDM没有显著减少(g = -0.01)。在奖励和概率增加的情况下,努力分配模式的改变表现为努力消耗的减少,精神分裂症谱系障碍表现出最明显的缺陷。最有力的调节因子是概率条件的数量、种族、性别以及阳性和阴性症状的严重程度。计算模型研究的叙述性综合表明,适应不良的EBDM可能反映了努力敏感性的增加,奖励敏感性的降低和认知障碍,在不同的疾病中存在差异。精神分裂症谱系障碍与非系统的努力分配和认知缺陷有关,而重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍则表现出更高的努力敏感性。总的来说,研究结果指出了EBDM的共同机制和疾病特异性机制,为有针对性的干预提供了方向。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological bulletin
Psychological bulletin 医学-心理学
CiteScore
33.60
自引率
0.90%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Psychological Bulletin publishes syntheses of research in scientific psychology. Research syntheses seek to summarize past research by drawing overall conclusions from many separate investigations that address related or identical hypotheses. A research synthesis typically presents the authors' assessments: -of the state of knowledge concerning the relations of interest; -of critical assessments of the strengths and weaknesses in past research; -of important issues that research has left unresolved, thereby directing future research so it can yield a maximum amount of new information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书