Healthy intentions: A daily diary intervention study on physical activity and unhealthy snacking at work.

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Jette Völker,Theresa J S Koch,Sabine Sonnentag
{"title":"Healthy intentions: A daily diary intervention study on physical activity and unhealthy snacking at work.","authors":"Jette Völker,Theresa J S Koch,Sabine Sonnentag","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Employees are often not sufficiently physically active and engage in unhealthy snacking during the workday. We address these unhealthy behaviors by evaluating an individual-level intervention based on the principle of mental contrasting with implementation intentions targeted at increasing physical activity and decreasing unhealthy snacking during the workday. In addition to evaluating intervention effectiveness (compared to a passive control group), we also contrast two intervention groups: Participants were either randomly allocated to refresher interventions focusing on physical activity versus unhealthy snacking each day (daily-assignment intervention group) or could decide which behavior to focus on each day (daily-choice intervention group). We employed a randomized controlled design within a daily diary study (73 employees, 516 days). Between-person results showed that the intervention successfully improved employees' accelerometer-assessed physical activity during the 2-week study phase. Moreover, participants in the daily-choice intervention group were more physically active than participants in the daily-assignment intervention group. Within-person results did not provide evidence of an additional benefit from daily intervention refreshers. The intervention was ineffective at reducing unhealthy snacking at work. Exploratory analyses suggested that the intervention was more effective in work environments characterized by higher levels of job stressors (for both physical activity and unhealthy snacking) and among individuals with higher baseline levels of unhealthy snacking. These findings highlight the potential of mental contrasting with implementation intention interventions in promoting health behaviors during the workday while suggesting that behavioral choice and individual boundary conditions (i.e., baseline levels and work context) can further enhance intervention effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Employees are often not sufficiently physically active and engage in unhealthy snacking during the workday. We address these unhealthy behaviors by evaluating an individual-level intervention based on the principle of mental contrasting with implementation intentions targeted at increasing physical activity and decreasing unhealthy snacking during the workday. In addition to evaluating intervention effectiveness (compared to a passive control group), we also contrast two intervention groups: Participants were either randomly allocated to refresher interventions focusing on physical activity versus unhealthy snacking each day (daily-assignment intervention group) or could decide which behavior to focus on each day (daily-choice intervention group). We employed a randomized controlled design within a daily diary study (73 employees, 516 days). Between-person results showed that the intervention successfully improved employees' accelerometer-assessed physical activity during the 2-week study phase. Moreover, participants in the daily-choice intervention group were more physically active than participants in the daily-assignment intervention group. Within-person results did not provide evidence of an additional benefit from daily intervention refreshers. The intervention was ineffective at reducing unhealthy snacking at work. Exploratory analyses suggested that the intervention was more effective in work environments characterized by higher levels of job stressors (for both physical activity and unhealthy snacking) and among individuals with higher baseline levels of unhealthy snacking. These findings highlight the potential of mental contrasting with implementation intention interventions in promoting health behaviors during the workday while suggesting that behavioral choice and individual boundary conditions (i.e., baseline levels and work context) can further enhance intervention effectiveness. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
健康意图:一项关于体力活动和工作时不健康零食的每日日记干预研究。
员工们通常没有足够的体力活动,在工作日吃不健康的零食。我们通过评估个人层面的干预来解决这些不健康的行为,该干预基于心理对比原则与实施意图,目标是在工作日增加身体活动和减少不健康的零食。除了评估干预效果(与被动对照组相比),我们还对比了两个干预组:参与者要么被随机分配到每天关注体育活动与不健康零食的复习干预(每日分配干预组),要么可以决定每天关注哪种行为(每日选择干预组)。我们采用随机对照设计进行每日日记研究(73名员工,516天)。人与人之间的结果表明,在为期两周的研究阶段,干预成功地改善了员工的加速度计评估的身体活动。此外,日常选择干预组的参与者比日常分配干预组的参与者更活跃。个人研究结果并没有提供每日干预复习的额外益处的证据。这种干预在减少工作时吃不健康零食方面是无效的。探索性分析表明,在工作压力(体力活动和不健康零食)水平较高的工作环境中,以及在不健康零食基线水平较高的个人中,干预更为有效。这些发现强调了心理对比与实施意图干预在促进工作日健康行为方面的潜力,同时表明行为选择和个人边界条件(即基线水平和工作环境)可以进一步提高干预效果。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书