Navigating Harassment as Bystanders: A Thematic Analysis of Internal Medicine Residents' Responses in Simulation-Based Training During Simulation After Video-Based Training.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Myriam Johnson, Byunghoon Tony Ahn, Cassandra Dutil, Negar Matin, Ning-Zi Sun, Keerat Grewal, Jason M Harley
{"title":"Navigating Harassment as Bystanders: A Thematic Analysis of Internal Medicine Residents' Responses in Simulation-Based Training During Simulation After Video-Based Training.","authors":"Myriam Johnson, Byunghoon Tony Ahn, Cassandra Dutil, Negar Matin, Ning-Zi Sun, Keerat Grewal, Jason M Harley","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Harassment is a persistent issue in medical training, negatively impacting trainees' well-being, learning, and professional development. Although bystander intervention programs aim to address harassment, little is known about how medical residents respond in real-time situations. This study examines internal medicine (IM) residents' bystander responses during a simulation-based anti-harassment training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an interpretivist thematic analysis to address our research questions in this article as part of a larger anti-harassment research study. Seventeen IM residents watched an educational anti-harassment video and then participated in a standardized simulation of a central line procedure, where they witnessed a senior resident (SR) harassing a medical student (MS), both portrayed by actors. Video and audio recordings captured verbal and nonverbal responses, which were coded iteratively. Descriptive frequency analysis tracked response patterns over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All residents used all 3 main categories of responses in the following order of frequency: MS-centered (reassuring, empathetic, or knowledge driven), passive (education focused, reattribution, avoidant, or unreactive), or SR-related (immediate direct, immediate indirect, or delayed responses). All residents used both reassuring and unreactive responses. Residents' use of the 3 main response categories varied over the course of the simulation. MS-centered responses were used throughout the simulation, whereas SR-related responses only started to appear midway through the simulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IM residents used varied intervention strategies, yet many defaulted to passive responses, potentially indicating hesitancy, uncertainty, or deference to hierarchy. These findings highlight the need for structured bystander training to build confidence in active intervention and improve responses to harassment in medical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"275-282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Harassment is a persistent issue in medical training, negatively impacting trainees' well-being, learning, and professional development. Although bystander intervention programs aim to address harassment, little is known about how medical residents respond in real-time situations. This study examines internal medicine (IM) residents' bystander responses during a simulation-based anti-harassment training.

Methods: We used an interpretivist thematic analysis to address our research questions in this article as part of a larger anti-harassment research study. Seventeen IM residents watched an educational anti-harassment video and then participated in a standardized simulation of a central line procedure, where they witnessed a senior resident (SR) harassing a medical student (MS), both portrayed by actors. Video and audio recordings captured verbal and nonverbal responses, which were coded iteratively. Descriptive frequency analysis tracked response patterns over time.

Results: All residents used all 3 main categories of responses in the following order of frequency: MS-centered (reassuring, empathetic, or knowledge driven), passive (education focused, reattribution, avoidant, or unreactive), or SR-related (immediate direct, immediate indirect, or delayed responses). All residents used both reassuring and unreactive responses. Residents' use of the 3 main response categories varied over the course of the simulation. MS-centered responses were used throughout the simulation, whereas SR-related responses only started to appear midway through the simulation.

Conclusion: IM residents used varied intervention strategies, yet many defaulted to passive responses, potentially indicating hesitancy, uncertainty, or deference to hierarchy. These findings highlight the need for structured bystander training to build confidence in active intervention and improve responses to harassment in medical training.

以旁观者的身份引导骚扰:内科住院医师在视频培训后模拟过程中对模拟培训的反应的专题分析
在医疗培训中,骚扰是一个长期存在的问题,对受训者的健康、学习和专业发展产生了负面影响。虽然旁观者干预计划旨在解决骚扰问题,但人们对住院医生如何在实时情况下做出反应知之甚少。本研究考察了内科(IM)住院医师在模拟反骚扰培训期间的旁观者反应。方法:我们使用解释主义主题分析来解决我们在这篇文章中的研究问题,作为更大的反骚扰研究的一部分。17名住院医生观看了一段反骚扰教育视频,然后参加了一个标准化的中央线程序模拟,在这个过程中,他们目睹了一名高级住院医生(SR)骚扰一名医科学生(MS),两人都由演员扮演。视频和音频记录了口头和非口头的反应,这些反应被迭代地编码。描述性频率分析跟踪了一段时间内的响应模式。结果:所有住院医师使用所有三种主要类型的回答,频率顺序如下:以ms为中心(安心、共情或知识驱动)、被动(教育为重点、归因、回避或无反应)或sr相关(即时直接、即时间接或延迟反应)。所有的居民都使用了安慰和非反应性的回答。在模拟过程中,居民对三种主要反应类别的使用有所不同。以ms为中心的反应贯穿整个模拟过程,而sr相关的反应只是在模拟过程的中间才开始出现。结论:住院医师使用不同的干预策略,但许多人默认被动回应,潜在地表明犹豫、不确定或服从等级。这些发现强调了有必要进行有组织的旁观者培训,以建立积极干预的信心,并改善对医疗培训中骚扰的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书