Paige Laxton, Sean Healy, Benjamin Brewer, Bryan McCormick, Elizabeth Orsega-Smith, Lee Smith, Julie Daly, Freda Patterson
{"title":"Characterizing Sedentary Behaviour in Residents With Intellectual Disability in Community Living Arrangements.","authors":"Paige Laxton, Sean Healy, Benjamin Brewer, Bryan McCormick, Elizabeth Orsega-Smith, Lee Smith, Julie Daly, Freda Patterson","doi":"10.1111/jir.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with intellectual disabilities (IDs), particularly those who reside in community living arrangements (CLAs), are at high risk for these chronic diseases. Sedentary behaviour (SB) is an emergent, independent risk factor for several chronic diseases including cardiovascular and metabolic conditions. SB may represent a potent behavioural target to mitigate chronic disease risk in adults with ID who live in CLAs. Limiting the development of interventions to address SB is a lack of understanding of device-estimated SB patterns. Also not clear are the individual-level determinants of SB in this high-risk group of CLA residents with ID. The current study sought to address these knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study design was used to characterize SB patterns and individual-level determinants of SB in adults with ID living in CLAs. Thirty-eight adults from 24 different CLAs wore activPAL devices for 1 week to enable device estimates of SB. activPAL data were processed, and the study outcomes of daily time spent in SB, SB bout lengths, sedentary breaks and prolonged SB were generated. Participants also completed an online survey to assess individual factors, which included demographics, independence, programming and health status. Univariate statistics were used to describe SB patterns and logistic regression models were used to ascertain the association between individual factors and SB variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, the sample were aged 44.79 years (SD = 14.9), and 60.53% were male. The sample were highly sedentary: 47.37% engaged in prolonged SB, the daily average time in SB was 7.46 h (SD = 2.18), and an average of 32.4 daily SB bouts (95% CI = 28.9, 35.9) lasted 17.7 min (95% CI = 13.8, 21.7). Participants requiring more assistance with ADLs were more likely to have longer uninterrupted sedentary bouts (95% CI = 0.169, 1.721; β = 0.945; p = 0.018) and total daily duration of SB (95% CI = 4.58, 20.21; β = 12.394; p = 0.003). Those with less than a high school education had sedentary bouts that were ~15 min longer (95% CI = 3.21, 25.69; p = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults with ID living in CLAs spent almost 8 h of their waking day in SB. Those with lower levels of independence and education were more likely to have higher levels of SB. CLAs may represent a critical opportunity for targeted, place-based interventions to reduce time spent in SB.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":"588-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Adults with intellectual disabilities (IDs), particularly those who reside in community living arrangements (CLAs), are at high risk for these chronic diseases. Sedentary behaviour (SB) is an emergent, independent risk factor for several chronic diseases including cardiovascular and metabolic conditions. SB may represent a potent behavioural target to mitigate chronic disease risk in adults with ID who live in CLAs. Limiting the development of interventions to address SB is a lack of understanding of device-estimated SB patterns. Also not clear are the individual-level determinants of SB in this high-risk group of CLA residents with ID. The current study sought to address these knowledge gaps.
Methods: A cross-sectional observational study design was used to characterize SB patterns and individual-level determinants of SB in adults with ID living in CLAs. Thirty-eight adults from 24 different CLAs wore activPAL devices for 1 week to enable device estimates of SB. activPAL data were processed, and the study outcomes of daily time spent in SB, SB bout lengths, sedentary breaks and prolonged SB were generated. Participants also completed an online survey to assess individual factors, which included demographics, independence, programming and health status. Univariate statistics were used to describe SB patterns and logistic regression models were used to ascertain the association between individual factors and SB variables.
Results: On average, the sample were aged 44.79 years (SD = 14.9), and 60.53% were male. The sample were highly sedentary: 47.37% engaged in prolonged SB, the daily average time in SB was 7.46 h (SD = 2.18), and an average of 32.4 daily SB bouts (95% CI = 28.9, 35.9) lasted 17.7 min (95% CI = 13.8, 21.7). Participants requiring more assistance with ADLs were more likely to have longer uninterrupted sedentary bouts (95% CI = 0.169, 1.721; β = 0.945; p = 0.018) and total daily duration of SB (95% CI = 4.58, 20.21; β = 12.394; p = 0.003). Those with less than a high school education had sedentary bouts that were ~15 min longer (95% CI = 3.21, 25.69; p = 0.013).
Conclusions: Adults with ID living in CLAs spent almost 8 h of their waking day in SB. Those with lower levels of independence and education were more likely to have higher levels of SB. CLAs may represent a critical opportunity for targeted, place-based interventions to reduce time spent in SB.
背景:智力残疾的成年人,特别是那些居住在社区生活安排(CLAs)中的人,是这些慢性疾病的高风险人群。久坐行为(SB)是包括心血管和代谢疾病在内的几种慢性疾病的一个新兴的、独立的危险因素。SB可能是一个有效的行为靶点,可以减轻生活在cla的成年ID患者的慢性疾病风险。由于缺乏对设备估计的SB模式的理解,限制了针对SB的干预措施的发展。同样不清楚的是,在CLA居民与ID的这一高风险群体中,SB的个人水平决定因素。目前的研究试图解决这些知识差距。方法:采用横断面观察性研究设计来描述生活在CLAs的ID成人SB的模式和个体水平的SB决定因素。来自24个不同cla的38名成年人佩戴激活pal设备1周,以对设备估计的个人激活pal数据进行处理,并生成每天在SB中花费的时间,SB的时间长度,久坐休息和延长SB的研究结果。参与者还完成了一项在线调查,以评估个人因素,其中包括人口统计、独立性、规划和健康状况。单因素统计用于描述SB模式,逻辑回归模型用于确定个体因素与SB变量之间的关联。结果:样本平均年龄44.79岁(SD = 14.9),男性占60.53%。这些样本都是高度久坐的:47.37%的人从事长时间的SB,每天平均SB时间为7.46小时(SD = 2.18),平均每天32.4次SB发作(95% CI = 28.9, 35.9)持续17.7分钟(95% CI = 13.8, 21.7)。需要更多adl帮助的参与者更有可能有更长的不间断久坐(95% CI = 0.169, 1.721; β = 0.945; p = 0.018)和每天SB的总持续时间(95% CI = 4.58, 20.21; β = 12.394; p = 0.003)。那些受教育程度低于高中的人久坐的时间要长15分钟(95% CI = 3.21, 25.69; p = 0.013)。结论:生活在CLAs中的ID成人醒着的时候几乎有8个小时是在SB中度过的。那些独立性和受教育程度较低的人更有可能有较高的SB水平。CLAs可能是一个有针对性的、基于地点的干预措施来减少SB时间的关键机会。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.