Sajal Kaur Minhas, Morgan Sangeux, Julia Polak, Michelle Carey
{"title":"The functional gait deviation index.","authors":"Sajal Kaur Minhas, Morgan Sangeux, Julia Polak, Michelle Carey","doi":"10.1080/02664763.2025.2514150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A typical gait analysis requires the examination of the motion of nine joint angles on the left-hand side and six joint angles on the right-hand side across multiple subjects. Due to the quantity and complexity of the data, it is useful to calculate the amount by which a subject's gait deviates from an average normal profile and to represent this deviation as a single number. Such a measure can quantify the overall severity of a condition affecting walking, monitor progress, or evaluate the outcome of an intervention prescribed to improve the gait pattern. The gait deviation index, gait profile score, and the overall abnormality measure are standard benchmarks for quantifying gait abnormality. However, these indices do not account for the intrinsic smoothness of the gait movement at each joint/plane and the potential co-variation between the joints/planes. Utilizing a multivariate functional principal component analysis we propose the functional gait deviation index (FGDI). FGDI accounts for the intrinsic smoothness of the gait movement at each joint/plane and the potential co-variation between the joints. We show that FGDI scales with overall gait function, provides a consistent measure of gait abnormality, and is implemented easily using an interactive web app.</p>","PeriodicalId":15239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Statistics","volume":"53 3","pages":"391-411"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12954805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2025.2514150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A typical gait analysis requires the examination of the motion of nine joint angles on the left-hand side and six joint angles on the right-hand side across multiple subjects. Due to the quantity and complexity of the data, it is useful to calculate the amount by which a subject's gait deviates from an average normal profile and to represent this deviation as a single number. Such a measure can quantify the overall severity of a condition affecting walking, monitor progress, or evaluate the outcome of an intervention prescribed to improve the gait pattern. The gait deviation index, gait profile score, and the overall abnormality measure are standard benchmarks for quantifying gait abnormality. However, these indices do not account for the intrinsic smoothness of the gait movement at each joint/plane and the potential co-variation between the joints/planes. Utilizing a multivariate functional principal component analysis we propose the functional gait deviation index (FGDI). FGDI accounts for the intrinsic smoothness of the gait movement at each joint/plane and the potential co-variation between the joints. We show that FGDI scales with overall gait function, provides a consistent measure of gait abnormality, and is implemented easily using an interactive web app.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Statistics provides a forum for communication between both applied statisticians and users of applied statistical techniques across a wide range of disciplines. These areas include business, computing, economics, ecology, education, management, medicine, operational research and sociology, but papers from other areas are also considered. The editorial policy is to publish rigorous but clear and accessible papers on applied techniques. Purely theoretical papers are avoided but those on theoretical developments which clearly demonstrate significant applied potential are welcomed. Each paper is submitted to at least two independent referees.