A Digital, Minority Stress-Focused Single-Session Intervention Benefits Multiply-Minoritized Sexual Minority Adolescents.

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ian Sotomayor, Ya-Wen Chang, Erica Szkody, Kathryn R Fox, Jessica L Schleider
{"title":"A Digital, Minority Stress-Focused Single-Session Intervention Benefits Multiply-Minoritized Sexual Minority Adolescents.","authors":"Ian Sotomayor, Ya-Wen Chang, Erica Szkody, Kathryn R Fox, Jessica L Schleider","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2025.2585451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Leveraging data from a previously conducted randomized trial, we examined whether Project RISE - a digital single-session intervention focused on minority stress - was associated with equal improvements in levels of internalized stigma, identity pride, hopelessness, depression, and anxiety among youth with a single minoritized or multiply-minoritized identities. We also tested whether higher levels of social support moderated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants randomly assigned to the intervention were included (<i>n</i> = 261 adolescents 13-16 years old; M age = 15; 51% youth of color; 68% transgender/gender-diverse). Two-way multivariate analysis of covariances examined potential group differences across outcomes, between individuals holding multiple minoritized identities versus one. Moderation analyses were used to investigate whether social support moderated RISE outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Identifying with multiple minoritized identities was associated with higher levels of identity pride immediately post-intervention. Identifying as a gender minority was associated with slightly greater identity pride post-intervention. Youth who endorsed gender minority identities reported higher levels of hopelessness, depression, and anxiety at 2-week follow-up, relative to cisgender youth. No other differences emerged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiply-minoritized youth, especially gender minority youth, experienced significantly higher levels of identity pride after completing Project RISE. Results highlight the importance of applying an intersectional minority stress framework to online intervention design and considering social contexts (e.g. high versus low social support) when selecting treatments for youth with intersecting identities. Clinicians should consider how interventions specifically addressed intersectional identities when providing evidence-based care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"253-267"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2025.2585451","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Leveraging data from a previously conducted randomized trial, we examined whether Project RISE - a digital single-session intervention focused on minority stress - was associated with equal improvements in levels of internalized stigma, identity pride, hopelessness, depression, and anxiety among youth with a single minoritized or multiply-minoritized identities. We also tested whether higher levels of social support moderated outcomes.

Method: Participants randomly assigned to the intervention were included (n = 261 adolescents 13-16 years old; M age = 15; 51% youth of color; 68% transgender/gender-diverse). Two-way multivariate analysis of covariances examined potential group differences across outcomes, between individuals holding multiple minoritized identities versus one. Moderation analyses were used to investigate whether social support moderated RISE outcomes.

Results: Identifying with multiple minoritized identities was associated with higher levels of identity pride immediately post-intervention. Identifying as a gender minority was associated with slightly greater identity pride post-intervention. Youth who endorsed gender minority identities reported higher levels of hopelessness, depression, and anxiety at 2-week follow-up, relative to cisgender youth. No other differences emerged.

Conclusions: Multiply-minoritized youth, especially gender minority youth, experienced significantly higher levels of identity pride after completing Project RISE. Results highlight the importance of applying an intersectional minority stress framework to online intervention design and considering social contexts (e.g. high versus low social support) when selecting treatments for youth with intersecting identities. Clinicians should consider how interventions specifically addressed intersectional identities when providing evidence-based care.

一个数字化的,以少数群体压力为中心的单次干预有利于多少数性少数青少年。
目的:利用之前进行的一项随机试验的数据,我们研究了RISE项目——一个专注于少数群体压力的数字单次干预——是否与具有单一或多重少数群体身份的青年在内化耻辱、身份自豪感、绝望、抑郁和焦虑水平方面的同等改善有关。我们还测试了更高水平的社会支持是否会调节结果。方法:随机分配参与干预的参与者包括(n = 261名13-16岁的青少年;M年龄= 15岁;51%的有色人种青年;68%的跨性别/性别多样化)。双向多变量协方差分析检查了结果之间潜在的群体差异,即拥有多个少数民族身份的个体与拥有一个少数民族身份的个体之间的差异。使用调节分析来调查社会支持是否调节RISE结果。结果:在干预后,对多个少数群体身份的认同与更高水平的身份自豪感相关。在干预后,被认定为性别少数群体与更大的身份自豪感相关。在两周的随访中,认同少数性别认同的青少年报告的绝望、抑郁和焦虑程度高于顺性青少年。没有其他差异。结论:多元少数族裔青年,尤其是性别少数族裔青年,在完成RISE项目后,其身份自豪感水平显著提高。结果强调了将交叉少数群体压力框架应用于在线干预设计的重要性,并在为具有交叉身份的青少年选择治疗时考虑社会背景(例如高社会支持与低社会支持)。临床医生在提供循证护理时应考虑干预措施具体如何处理交叉身份。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) is the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association. It publishes original contributions on the following topics: (a) the development and evaluation of assessment and intervention techniques for use with clinical child and adolescent populations; (b) the development and maintenance of clinical child and adolescent problems; (c) cross-cultural and sociodemographic issues that have a clear bearing on clinical child and adolescent psychology in terms of theory, research, or practice; and (d) training and professional practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology, as well as child advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书