Employee daily workload and daily procrastination: Examining a curvilinear relationship moderated by trait mindfulness and its effects on performance and well-being.

IF 3.9 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-02 DOI:10.1037/ocp0000427
Wenfei Zhang, Xiao-Min Xu, Xizhi Liu, Bettina S Wiese
{"title":"Employee daily workload and daily procrastination: Examining a curvilinear relationship moderated by trait mindfulness and its effects on performance and well-being.","authors":"Wenfei Zhang, Xiao-Min Xu, Xizhi Liu, Bettina S Wiese","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research on the relationship between workload and procrastination has produced conflicting theoretical explanations and inconsistent findings, and the role of individual differences in shaping this relationship remains largely unexplored. The present study addresses these limitations by investigating a curvilinear effect in the daily experience of workload and daily procrastination and including trait mindfulness as a person-related boundary condition. Using a daily diary design, we collected data from 159 full-time employees via two surveys per day over two consecutive working weeks and obtained 2,626 daily observations (i.e., 1,352 work-time surveys and 1,274 after-work surveys). Results of the multilevel analysis indicated a significant interaction between daily workload and trait mindfulness on daily procrastination. Specifically, employees with high trait mindfulness show a significant U-shaped curve, whereas those with lower trait mindfulness levels show a significant inverted U-shaped relationship. Furthermore, these effects indirectly influence both performance and daily well-being through their impact on daily procrastination. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"174-187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000427","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research on the relationship between workload and procrastination has produced conflicting theoretical explanations and inconsistent findings, and the role of individual differences in shaping this relationship remains largely unexplored. The present study addresses these limitations by investigating a curvilinear effect in the daily experience of workload and daily procrastination and including trait mindfulness as a person-related boundary condition. Using a daily diary design, we collected data from 159 full-time employees via two surveys per day over two consecutive working weeks and obtained 2,626 daily observations (i.e., 1,352 work-time surveys and 1,274 after-work surveys). Results of the multilevel analysis indicated a significant interaction between daily workload and trait mindfulness on daily procrastination. Specifically, employees with high trait mindfulness show a significant U-shaped curve, whereas those with lower trait mindfulness levels show a significant inverted U-shaped relationship. Furthermore, these effects indirectly influence both performance and daily well-being through their impact on daily procrastination. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

员工日常工作量与日常拖延:由特质正念调节的曲线关系及其对绩效和幸福感的影响。
之前关于工作量和拖延症之间关系的研究产生了相互矛盾的理论解释和不一致的结果,而个体差异在形成这种关系中的作用在很大程度上仍未被探索。本研究通过调查日常工作负荷和日常拖延的曲线效应,并将特质正念作为个人相关的边界条件,解决了这些局限性。采用每日日记设计,我们通过连续两个工作周每天两次调查收集159名全职员工的数据,获得2,626次每日观察(即1,352次工作时间调查和1,274次下班后调查)。多水平分析结果表明,日常工作负荷与特质正念对日常拖延有显著的交互作用。其中,特质正念水平高的员工表现出显著的u型关系,特质正念水平低的员工表现出显著的倒u型关系。此外,这些影响通过对日常拖延的影响间接影响表现和日常幸福感。讨论了理论和实践意义。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书