Comparative Evaluation of High- versus Low-Viscosity Silicone Oil in Macula-Off Retinal Detachment: Emulsification, Inflammation, and AI-Assisted Biomarker Detection.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmologica Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-26 DOI:10.1159/000551074
Cesare Mariotti, Silvia Iorio, Giulia Gregori, Enrico Nacciarriti, Lorenzo Mangoni, Clara Rizzo, Marco Lupidi
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of High- versus Low-Viscosity Silicone Oil in Macula-Off Retinal Detachment: Emulsification, Inflammation, and AI-Assisted Biomarker Detection.","authors":"Cesare Mariotti, Silvia Iorio, Giulia Gregori, Enrico Nacciarriti, Lorenzo Mangoni, Clara Rizzo, Marco Lupidi","doi":"10.1159/000551074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare the emulsification rates, intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, and retinal hyperreflective foci (HRF) between low-viscosity (1,000 cS) and high-viscosity (5,000 cS) silicone oils (SOs) used as tamponade agents following 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in cases of naïve macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based quantification approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted in eyes treated with PPV and SO tamponade. The clinical parameters that were assessed included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, the presence of emulsification in the iridocorneal angle - in the anterior or posterior chambers, and structural retinal biomarkers such as intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid, and HRF detected and quantified through an AI-based analysis of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five eyes were enrolled (12 with 1,000-cS SO and 13 with 5,000-cS SO endotamponades) for this study. No statistically significant differences in BCVA or anatomical outcomes between the two groups were found. However, SO emulsification occurred more often in the 1,000-cS group (66%) compared to the 5,000-cS group (7%) (p = 0.0036). Elevated IOP was more frequent in the 1,000-cS group (8 vs. 4 cases; p = 0.03), and HRF count was significantly higher in eyes with 1,000-cS oil (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-viscosity SO demonstrated a lower emulsification rate and reduced inflammatory response compared to low-viscosity SO, with no compromise in visual outcomes. AI-assisted OCT analysis enabled an accurate, automated detection of HRF, supporting its utility in monitoring SO-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":19595,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":"230-237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000551074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the emulsification rates, intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, and retinal hyperreflective foci (HRF) between low-viscosity (1,000 cS) and high-viscosity (5,000 cS) silicone oils (SOs) used as tamponade agents following 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in cases of naïve macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using an artificial intelligence (AI)-based quantification approach.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in eyes treated with PPV and SO tamponade. The clinical parameters that were assessed included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), IOP, the presence of emulsification in the iridocorneal angle - in the anterior or posterior chambers, and structural retinal biomarkers such as intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid, and HRF detected and quantified through an AI-based analysis of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

Results: Twenty-five eyes were enrolled (12 with 1,000-cS SO and 13 with 5,000-cS SO endotamponades) for this study. No statistically significant differences in BCVA or anatomical outcomes between the two groups were found. However, SO emulsification occurred more often in the 1,000-cS group (66%) compared to the 5,000-cS group (7%) (p = 0.0036). Elevated IOP was more frequent in the 1,000-cS group (8 vs. 4 cases; p = 0.03), and HRF count was significantly higher in eyes with 1,000-cS oil (p = 0.04).

Conclusion: High-viscosity SO demonstrated a lower emulsification rate and reduced inflammatory response compared to low-viscosity SO, with no compromise in visual outcomes. AI-assisted OCT analysis enabled an accurate, automated detection of HRF, supporting its utility in monitoring SO-related complications.

高粘度硅油与低粘度硅油在黄斑脱离视网膜中的比较评价:乳化、炎症和人工智能辅助生物标志物检测。
前言:采用基于人工智能(AI)的量化方法,比较25号玻璃体切除(PPV)后低粘度(1000 cS)和高粘度(5000 cS)硅油(SO)作为压塞剂在naïve黄斑脱落型孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)病例中的乳化率、眼压(IOP)变化和视网膜超反射灶(HRF)。方法:对PPV和SO填塞治疗的眼进行回顾性研究。评估的临床参数包括最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼内压(IOP)、虹膜-角膜角、前房或后房乳化的存在,以及通过基于人工智能的光谱域OCT图像分析检测和量化的视网膜内液(IRF)、视网膜下液(SRF)和高反射灶(HRF)等结构性视网膜生物标志物。结果:25只眼入组,其中12只眼为1000 cS SO, 13只眼为5000 cS SO。两组间BCVA及解剖结果无统计学差异。然而,与5000 cS组(7%)相比,1000 cS组(66%)的SO乳化发生率更高(p = 0.0036)。IOP升高在1000 cS组更为常见(8例对4例,p = 0.03), HRF计数在1000 cS油组明显更高(p = 0.04)。结论:与低粘度SO相比,高粘度SO表现出更低的乳化率和更少的炎症反应,并且没有损害视力结果。人工智能辅助OCT分析能够准确、自动地检测HRF,支持其在监测so相关并发症中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
39
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1899, ''Ophthalmologica'' has become a frequently cited guide to international work in clinical and experimental ophthalmology. It contains a selection of patient-oriented contributions covering the etiology of eye diseases, diagnostic techniques, and advances in medical and surgical treatment. Straightforward, factual reporting provides both interesting and useful reading. In addition to original papers, ''Ophthalmologica'' features regularly timely reviews in an effort to keep the reader well informed and updated. The large international circulation of this journal reflects its importance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书