Control and Value Appraisals in AI-Mediated Language Learning: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of EFL Learners' Emotions, Engagement and Affective Judgements

IF 5.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jing Zhao, Lei Yang
{"title":"Control and Value Appraisals in AI-Mediated Language Learning: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of EFL Learners' Emotions, Engagement and Affective Judgements","authors":"Jing Zhao,&nbsp;Lei Yang","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The rapid expansion of AI-supported instructional tools has reshaped how emotions, motivation and engagement operate in language learning environments. Guided by Control–Value Theory (CVT), this study examines how learners' emotional appraisals, technology-related affective attitudes and engagement behaviours collectively shape their judgements about the balance between AI-driven support and human instruction. A sample of 738 Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners from eight universities completed validated measures of Foreign Language Enjoyment (FLE), Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety (FLCA), academic engagement/disengagement, technology-related affective attitudes and perceptions of AI–human interaction balance. Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) (AMOS 24) and complementary analyses in SPSS 27, the results showed that enjoyment and positive affect toward technology significantly promoted engagement, whereas anxiety exerted a negative influence. Engagement, in turn, strongly predicted learners' evaluations of AI–human instructional balance and functioned as a mediating mechanism linking emotional and attitudinal appraisals to AI-related perceptions. Significant direct effects from FLE, FLCA and technology attitudes to AI–human balance also emerged, indicating a partially mediated structural pattern. These findings highlight the centrality of control and value appraisals in shaping both engagement and affective judgements within AI-mediated learning settings. The study extends CVT to technology-enhanced language learning and provides practical guidance for designing emotionally supportive and pedagogically balanced AI-integrated EFL environments. Implications for teaching, instructional design and policy, along with recommendations for future research, are presented.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid expansion of AI-supported instructional tools has reshaped how emotions, motivation and engagement operate in language learning environments. Guided by Control–Value Theory (CVT), this study examines how learners' emotional appraisals, technology-related affective attitudes and engagement behaviours collectively shape their judgements about the balance between AI-driven support and human instruction. A sample of 738 Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners from eight universities completed validated measures of Foreign Language Enjoyment (FLE), Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety (FLCA), academic engagement/disengagement, technology-related affective attitudes and perceptions of AI–human interaction balance. Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) (AMOS 24) and complementary analyses in SPSS 27, the results showed that enjoyment and positive affect toward technology significantly promoted engagement, whereas anxiety exerted a negative influence. Engagement, in turn, strongly predicted learners' evaluations of AI–human instructional balance and functioned as a mediating mechanism linking emotional and attitudinal appraisals to AI-related perceptions. Significant direct effects from FLE, FLCA and technology attitudes to AI–human balance also emerged, indicating a partially mediated structural pattern. These findings highlight the centrality of control and value appraisals in shaping both engagement and affective judgements within AI-mediated learning settings. The study extends CVT to technology-enhanced language learning and provides practical guidance for designing emotionally supportive and pedagogically balanced AI-integrated EFL environments. Implications for teaching, instructional design and policy, along with recommendations for future research, are presented.

人工智能介导的语言学习中的控制和价值评价:对英语学习者情绪、投入和情感判断的多维分析
人工智能支持的教学工具的快速发展重塑了情感、动机和参与在语言学习环境中的运作方式。在控制价值理论(CVT)的指导下,本研究考察了学习者的情感评估、与技术相关的情感态度和参与行为如何共同影响他们对人工智能驱动的支持和人类教学之间平衡的判断。来自八所大学的738名中国英语学习者完成了外语享受(FLE)、外语课堂焦虑(FLCA)、学术参与/脱离、技术相关情感态度和人工智能-人类互动平衡感知的有效测量。利用结构方程模型(SEM) (AMOS 24)和SPSS 27中的补充分析,结果表明,享受和对技术的积极影响显著促进了参与,而焦虑则产生了负向影响。参与度反过来强烈地预测了学习者对人工智能-人类教学平衡的评价,并作为一种中介机制,将情感和态度评价与人工智能相关的感知联系起来。FLE, FLCA和技术态度对AI-human - balance的显著直接影响也出现了,表明部分介导的结构模式。这些发现强调了在人工智能介导的学习环境中,控制和价值评估在塑造参与和情感判断方面的中心地位。该研究将CVT扩展到技术增强的语言学习,并为设计情感支持和教学平衡的人工智能集成英语环境提供了实践指导。本文提出了对教学、教学设计和政策的启示,以及对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书