Primary Care Lifestyle Redesign® Clinical Trial: Diabetes Outcomes, Healthcare Utilization, and Costs.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Valerie A Tapia, Stacey Schepens Niemiec, Jaime D Leite, Jesus Diaz, Josh Banerjee, Jagruti Shukla, Elizabeth A Pyatak
{"title":"Primary Care Lifestyle Redesign<sup>®</sup> Clinical Trial: Diabetes Outcomes, Healthcare Utilization, and Costs.","authors":"Valerie A Tapia, Stacey Schepens Niemiec, Jaime D Leite, Jesus Diaz, Josh Banerjee, Jagruti Shukla, Elizabeth A Pyatak","doi":"10.1177/00084174261421403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> In primary care (PC) clinical, healthcare utilization, and financial outcomes associated with Lifestyle Redesign<sup>®</sup> Occupational Therapy (LR-OT), a framework that incorporates healthy habits into daily routines, are not well documented in the United States. <b>Purpose:</b> (a) Compare clinical outcomes, healthcare utilization, and associated cost differences between patients who received LR-OT and a control group. (b) Assess the investment required integrate LR-OT into PC. <b>Method:</b> LR-OT was integrated into a safety-net PC clinic. In a hybrid effectiveness-implementation clinical trial (#NCT03293914), clinical (glycated hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], blood pressure, cholesterol, and body mass index) and utilization (outpatient, emergency department [ED], hospital visits) data were extracted from medical records of provider-referred adults with diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 9.0%) who were willing to make lifestyle changes. <b>Results:</b> Of 155 referred patients, 142 were randomized to LR-OT (<i>n</i> = 73) or a control group (<i>n</i> = 69), and 42 completed eight LR-OT sessions within 6 months. Underpowered clinical outcomes indicated no significant change, with aggregated trends suggesting LR-OT supports sustained cardiometabolic improvement. Savings of $250,518.96 is attributed to LR-OT, driven by significant decreases in ED visits (<i>p</i> = .03) and hospital days (<i>p</i> = .03), despite nonsignificant increases in outpatient utilization. The projected cost-benefit of integrating a full-time LR-OT in PC is $352,326.72 with a 236% return on investment. <b>Conclusion:</b> Clinical trends and significant reductions in acute care services drove healthcare-wide cost savings, demonstrating clinical and financial value of integrating LR-OT into PC.</p>","PeriodicalId":49097,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","volume":" ","pages":"204-216"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13187234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174261421403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In primary care (PC) clinical, healthcare utilization, and financial outcomes associated with Lifestyle Redesign® Occupational Therapy (LR-OT), a framework that incorporates healthy habits into daily routines, are not well documented in the United States. Purpose: (a) Compare clinical outcomes, healthcare utilization, and associated cost differences between patients who received LR-OT and a control group. (b) Assess the investment required integrate LR-OT into PC. Method: LR-OT was integrated into a safety-net PC clinic. In a hybrid effectiveness-implementation clinical trial (#NCT03293914), clinical (glycated hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c], blood pressure, cholesterol, and body mass index) and utilization (outpatient, emergency department [ED], hospital visits) data were extracted from medical records of provider-referred adults with diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 9.0%) who were willing to make lifestyle changes. Results: Of 155 referred patients, 142 were randomized to LR-OT (n = 73) or a control group (n = 69), and 42 completed eight LR-OT sessions within 6 months. Underpowered clinical outcomes indicated no significant change, with aggregated trends suggesting LR-OT supports sustained cardiometabolic improvement. Savings of $250,518.96 is attributed to LR-OT, driven by significant decreases in ED visits (p = .03) and hospital days (p = .03), despite nonsignificant increases in outpatient utilization. The projected cost-benefit of integrating a full-time LR-OT in PC is $352,326.72 with a 236% return on investment. Conclusion: Clinical trends and significant reductions in acute care services drove healthcare-wide cost savings, demonstrating clinical and financial value of integrating LR-OT into PC.

初级保健生活方式重新设计®临床试验:糖尿病结局、医疗保健利用和成本。
背景:在初级保健(PC)临床,与生活方式再设计®职业治疗(LR-OT)相关的医疗保健利用和财务结果,将健康习惯纳入日常生活的框架,在美国没有很好的文献记载。目的:(a)比较接受LR-OT的患者与对照组之间的临床结果、医疗保健利用和相关成本差异。(b)评估将LR-OT纳入PC所需的投资。方法:将LR-OT纳入安全网PC门诊。在一项混合有效性实施的临床试验(#NCT03293914)中,临床(糖化血红蛋白A1c [HbA1c]、血压、胆固醇和体重指数)和利用(门诊、急诊[ED]、医院就诊)数据从医生推荐的愿意改变生活方式的成人糖尿病患者(HbA1c≥9.0%)的医疗记录中提取。结果:155例转诊患者中,142例被随机分配到LR-OT组(n = 73)或对照组(n = 69), 42例在6个月内完成了8次LR-OT治疗。缺乏动力的临床结果显示无显著变化,综合趋势表明LR-OT支持持续的心脏代谢改善。由于急诊科就诊(p = 0.03)和住院天数(p = 0.03)显著减少,LR-OT节省了250 518.96美元。03),尽管门诊使用率没有显著增加。将全职LR-OT集成到PC中的预计成本效益为352,326.72美元,投资回报率为236%。结论:临床趋势和急症护理服务的显著减少推动了医疗保健范围内的成本节约,证明了将LR-OT整合到PC中的临床和财务价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy was first published in September 1933. Since that time, it has fostered advancement and growth in occupational therapy scholarship. The mission of the journal is to provide a forum for leading-edge occupational therapy scholarship that advances theory, practice, research, and policy. The vision is to be a high-quality scholarly journal that is at the forefront of the science of occupational therapy and a destination journal for the top scholars in the field, globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书