Olivia S Malkowski, Genevieve F Dunton, Nick P Townsend, Mark J Kelson, Max J Western
{"title":"Feasibility and acceptability of 7-day smartphone-based, activity-triggered Ecological Momentary Assessment among low-income older adults.","authors":"Olivia S Malkowski, Genevieve F Dunton, Nick P Townsend, Mark J Kelson, Max J Western","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to collect real-time data on physical activity behavior. However, no activity-triggered EMA studies have been conducted among low-income older adults. We aim to assess the feasibility and acceptability of activity-triggered EMA in low-income older adults.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Researchers partnered with community organizations and provided technical support to facilitate the recruitment and retention of low-income older adults. For 7 days, 39 older adults (76.4 ± 8.5 years; 76% earning below £25 000/year) received EMA surveys when they surpassed a predefined activity/inactivity threshold, or when two hours elapsed between prompts. Participants wore a Move 4 activity sensor to measure their steps. A post-study questionnaire assessed perceptions of acceptability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants completed 84% of the EMA surveys they received. EMA compliance did not appear to differ as a function of age, biological sex, time of day, day of week, or concurrent physical activity. Responses to the post-study questionnaire revealed that the most enjoyable aspects of participating in the study were making a worthwhile contribution to science and becoming more self-aware of their feelings and/or activities. The least enjoyable aspects included the frequency or timing of EMA prompts, the interruption of activities to complete an EMA survey, and limited or inadequate response options for certain EMA items.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Smartphone-based, activity-triggered EMA is feasible and acceptable among low-income older adults. Fostering community partnerships, managing participant resource constraints, and providing technical support are crucial strategies for engaging and retaining this population in mobile health research.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"10 2","pages":"igaf151"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926715/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is increasingly used to collect real-time data on physical activity behavior. However, no activity-triggered EMA studies have been conducted among low-income older adults. We aim to assess the feasibility and acceptability of activity-triggered EMA in low-income older adults.
Research design and methods: Researchers partnered with community organizations and provided technical support to facilitate the recruitment and retention of low-income older adults. For 7 days, 39 older adults (76.4 ± 8.5 years; 76% earning below £25 000/year) received EMA surveys when they surpassed a predefined activity/inactivity threshold, or when two hours elapsed between prompts. Participants wore a Move 4 activity sensor to measure their steps. A post-study questionnaire assessed perceptions of acceptability.
Results: Participants completed 84% of the EMA surveys they received. EMA compliance did not appear to differ as a function of age, biological sex, time of day, day of week, or concurrent physical activity. Responses to the post-study questionnaire revealed that the most enjoyable aspects of participating in the study were making a worthwhile contribution to science and becoming more self-aware of their feelings and/or activities. The least enjoyable aspects included the frequency or timing of EMA prompts, the interruption of activities to complete an EMA survey, and limited or inadequate response options for certain EMA items.
Discussion and implications: Smartphone-based, activity-triggered EMA is feasible and acceptable among low-income older adults. Fostering community partnerships, managing participant resource constraints, and providing technical support are crucial strategies for engaging and retaining this population in mobile health research.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.