Speech under stress: Affective and cognitive reactivity in schizophrenia and their functional correlates

IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Schizophrenia Research-Cognition Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-14 DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2026.100423
Kyle S. Minor , Madisen T. Russell , Evan J. Myers , Audrey T. Satchivi , Maya E. Brown-Hughston , Erica L. Whiting , Deborah Daluga , Rachel C. Marks , Michaela M. Di Palmo , Basma O. Aly
{"title":"Speech under stress: Affective and cognitive reactivity in schizophrenia and their functional correlates","authors":"Kyle S. Minor ,&nbsp;Madisen T. Russell ,&nbsp;Evan J. Myers ,&nbsp;Audrey T. Satchivi ,&nbsp;Maya E. Brown-Hughston ,&nbsp;Erica L. Whiting ,&nbsp;Deborah Daluga ,&nbsp;Rachel C. Marks ,&nbsp;Michaela M. Di Palmo ,&nbsp;Basma O. Aly","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2026.100423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Disorganized speech is a core diagnostic criterion of schizophrenia, yet mechanisms driving its variability remain unclear. Building on evidence from schizotypy and first-episode psychosis literature, we examined whether affective and cognitive systems influence speech disorganization in schizophrenia. Thirty-five individuals with schizophrenia (n = 35) and 37 healthy controls completed a validated speech paradigm across three conditions: neutral, affective, and cognitive load. Trained raters assessed disorganized speech using the Communication Disturbances Index (CDI). Reactivity was quantified using standardized residual change scores. The schizophrenia group exhibited significantly greater disorganized speech across all conditions (<em>d</em> = 0.58–0.89). Of note, affective reactivity emerged only when using regression-based analyses controlling for neutral condition disorganization, not with repeated-measures ANOVA—revealing important methodological considerations for detecting subtle stress-vulnerability patterns. Despite well-documented cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, cognitive reactivity was not observed. Both affective and cognitive reactivity showed medium inverse correlations with neurocognitive functioning (<em>r</em> = −0.36 to −0.41), but lower correlations with social or role functioning, contrasting with findings in earlier illness stages. These results demonstrate that disorganized speech in schizophrenia is contextually sensitive, with reactivity patterns linked to cognitive impairment. Furthermore, it builds upon prior evidence in schizotypy and first-episode psychosis groups, establishing associations across the psychosis-spectrum. Future research should explore how reactivity patterns evolve across illness stages to inform tailored interventions targeting emotion regulation and cognitive remediation based on individual reactivity profiles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100423"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001326000065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disorganized speech is a core diagnostic criterion of schizophrenia, yet mechanisms driving its variability remain unclear. Building on evidence from schizotypy and first-episode psychosis literature, we examined whether affective and cognitive systems influence speech disorganization in schizophrenia. Thirty-five individuals with schizophrenia (n = 35) and 37 healthy controls completed a validated speech paradigm across three conditions: neutral, affective, and cognitive load. Trained raters assessed disorganized speech using the Communication Disturbances Index (CDI). Reactivity was quantified using standardized residual change scores. The schizophrenia group exhibited significantly greater disorganized speech across all conditions (d = 0.58–0.89). Of note, affective reactivity emerged only when using regression-based analyses controlling for neutral condition disorganization, not with repeated-measures ANOVA—revealing important methodological considerations for detecting subtle stress-vulnerability patterns. Despite well-documented cognitive deficits in schizophrenia, cognitive reactivity was not observed. Both affective and cognitive reactivity showed medium inverse correlations with neurocognitive functioning (r = −0.36 to −0.41), but lower correlations with social or role functioning, contrasting with findings in earlier illness stages. These results demonstrate that disorganized speech in schizophrenia is contextually sensitive, with reactivity patterns linked to cognitive impairment. Furthermore, it builds upon prior evidence in schizotypy and first-episode psychosis groups, establishing associations across the psychosis-spectrum. Future research should explore how reactivity patterns evolve across illness stages to inform tailored interventions targeting emotion regulation and cognitive remediation based on individual reactivity profiles.
应激下的言语:精神分裂症的情感和认知反应及其功能相关性。
言语紊乱是精神分裂症的一个核心诊断标准,但导致其变异性的机制尚不清楚。基于精神分裂型和首发精神病文献的证据,我们研究了情感和认知系统是否影响精神分裂症患者的言语紊乱。35名精神分裂症患者(n = 35)和37名健康对照者在三种条件下完成了有效的语言范式:中性、情感和认知负荷。训练有素的评分员使用沟通障碍指数(CDI)来评估无组织的言语。反应性采用标准化剩余变化评分进行量化。精神分裂症组在所有情况下都表现出更大的语言紊乱(d = 0.58-0.89)。值得注意的是,情感反应仅在使用基于回归的分析控制中性条件紊乱时出现,而不是使用重复测量的方差分析-揭示了检测微妙压力-脆弱性模式的重要方法考虑。尽管有充分证据表明精神分裂症患者存在认知缺陷,但并未观察到认知反应性。情感反应和认知反应与神经认知功能呈中等负相关(r = -0.36至-0.41),但与社会或角色功能的相关性较低,与早期疾病阶段的研究结果相比。这些结果表明,精神分裂症患者的语言紊乱具有上下文敏感性,其反应模式与认知障碍有关。此外,它建立在分裂型和首发精神病群体的先前证据的基础上,建立了跨精神病谱的关联。未来的研究应该探索反应模式是如何在疾病阶段演变的,从而为基于个体反应概况的针对情绪调节和认知修复的量身定制的干预提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书