Assessment of the Effect of Various Teaching Strategies on Medical Students' Skills, Attitudes, and Comfort During Gynecological Examinations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Luciano Fernandes Loures, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti, Sabrine Teixeira Ferraz Grünewald, Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel, Giancarlo Lucchetti
{"title":"Assessment of the Effect of Various Teaching Strategies on Medical Students' Skills, Attitudes, and Comfort During Gynecological Examinations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Luciano Fernandes Loures, Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti, Sabrine Teixeira Ferraz Grünewald, Oscarina da Silva Ezequiel, Giancarlo Lucchetti","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Few studies have evaluated the stress-related factors experienced by medical students during gynecological examination training or the effectiveness of different teaching strategies involving real patients. This study aims to assess the impact of 3 distinct instructional approaches, each incorporating a commercially available pelvic examination simulator, on medical students' clinical skills, attitudes, and comfort levels when performing gynecological examinations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 138 clerkship students received a commercially available pelvic examination simulator and were randomly assigned to the following interventions: reading a handout (reading), watching a video of pelvic examination on a pelvic model (model video), or watching a video of patient experience with pelvic examinations (testimonial video). Skill performance, measures of fear/anxiety/comfort, and overall satisfaction were assessed during both simulated and real patient encounters to evaluate the impact of each teaching modality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences in all dependent variables for time (all P < 0.001) and for the time × group interaction on the Fear of Pelvic Examination Scale (F-PEXS) for discomfort ( P = 0.038). Post hoc analyses between subjects in the real-life environment revealed higher total F-PEXS ( P = 0.034) and F-PEXS discomfort ( P = 0.009) scores for the model video compared with reading and higher scores for the testimonial video compared with reading on the pelvic examination checklist ( P = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite good acquisition of skills, the model video group demonstrated greater fear of performing pelvic examinations. By contrast, the reading group exhibited the lowest acquisition of skills, but lower levels of fear. The testimonial video group exhibited good acquisition of skills and low fear levels. These findings support the ongoing discussion and potential implementation of brief, targeted educational strategies for teaching pelvic examination techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"106-115"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000917","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Few studies have evaluated the stress-related factors experienced by medical students during gynecological examination training or the effectiveness of different teaching strategies involving real patients. This study aims to assess the impact of 3 distinct instructional approaches, each incorporating a commercially available pelvic examination simulator, on medical students' clinical skills, attitudes, and comfort levels when performing gynecological examinations.

Methods: A total of 138 clerkship students received a commercially available pelvic examination simulator and were randomly assigned to the following interventions: reading a handout (reading), watching a video of pelvic examination on a pelvic model (model video), or watching a video of patient experience with pelvic examinations (testimonial video). Skill performance, measures of fear/anxiety/comfort, and overall satisfaction were assessed during both simulated and real patient encounters to evaluate the impact of each teaching modality.

Results: Mixed analysis of variance revealed statistically significant differences in all dependent variables for time (all P < 0.001) and for the time × group interaction on the Fear of Pelvic Examination Scale (F-PEXS) for discomfort ( P = 0.038). Post hoc analyses between subjects in the real-life environment revealed higher total F-PEXS ( P = 0.034) and F-PEXS discomfort ( P = 0.009) scores for the model video compared with reading and higher scores for the testimonial video compared with reading on the pelvic examination checklist ( P = 0.034).

Conclusions: Despite good acquisition of skills, the model video group demonstrated greater fear of performing pelvic examinations. By contrast, the reading group exhibited the lowest acquisition of skills, but lower levels of fear. The testimonial video group exhibited good acquisition of skills and low fear levels. These findings support the ongoing discussion and potential implementation of brief, targeted educational strategies for teaching pelvic examination techniques.

评价不同教学策略对医学生妇科检查技能、态度和舒适度的影响:一项随机对照试验。
导读:很少有研究评估医学生在妇科检查培训中所经历的压力相关因素或涉及真实患者的不同教学策略的有效性。本研究旨在评估三种不同的教学方法的影响,每种方法都包含一个市售的骨盆检查模拟器,对医学生在进行妇科检查时的临床技能、态度和舒适度的影响。方法:共有138名见习学生接受市售的盆腔检查模拟器,并被随机分配到以下干预措施:阅读讲义(阅读),观看盆腔模型盆腔检查视频(模型视频),或观看盆腔检查患者体验视频(推荐视频)。在模拟和真实的病人接触中评估技能表现,恐惧/焦虑/舒适的测量和总体满意度,以评估每种教学模式的影响。结果:混合方差分析显示,所有因变量在时间(均P < 0.001)和时间×组相互作用对盆腔检查恐惧量表(F-PEXS)不适(P = 0.038)上的差异均有统计学意义。事后分析显示,与阅读相比,模型视频的F-PEXS总分(P = 0.034)和F-PEXS不适感(P = 0.009)得分更高,与盆腔检查清单上的阅读相比,推荐视频的得分更高(P = 0.034)。结论:尽管模型视频组的技能习得良好,但对骨盆检查表现出更大的恐惧。相比之下,阅读组表现出最低的技能习得程度,但恐惧程度较低。录像组表现出良好的技能习得和较低的恐惧水平。这些发现支持正在进行的讨论和潜在的实施简短,有针对性的教育策略,以教授盆腔检查技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书