Contiguous and non-contiguous instructed actions: Teaching-by-doing in cohort-organized whole-group and small-group classroom interactions

IF 2.1 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Linguistics and Education Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.linged.2026.101513
Ali Reza Majlesi
{"title":"Contiguous and non-contiguous instructed actions: Teaching-by-doing in cohort-organized whole-group and small-group classroom interactions","authors":"Ali Reza Majlesi","doi":"10.1016/j.linged.2026.101513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates how instructional practices are temporally and multimodally organized in classroom interaction. While prior ethnomethodological conversation analytic (EMCA) research has examined how instructions are produced through talk, embodied demonstration, and material resources, less attention has been paid to how instruction shifts between distal, non-contiguous framing and immediate, contiguous procedural enactments. The data consist of 10 hours of video-recorded interaction from two settings: Swedish for Immigrants (SFI) language classrooms and STEM (mathematics/physics) courses in upper secondary education. Using EMCA, the data show how teachers and students collaboratively move between framing instructions and proceduring them through embodied, material, and spatially organized action. Instructional work unfolds along a continuum between non-contiguous instruction, where rules and principles are introduced in advance, and contiguous instruction, where instruction and enactment are laminated into the same interactional sequence. The findings demonstrate that instructional clarity is not achieved through instruction-giving alone, but through practices such as parsing, staging, and embodied directives, whereby teachers guide instruction-following through teaching-by-doing. By comparing whole-group and small-group interaction across language and STEM classrooms, the study clarifies how temporal sequencing and multimodality jointly produce instructional order and contributes to EMCA research on instruction in educational settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47468,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics and Education","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 101513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics and Education","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589826000227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates how instructional practices are temporally and multimodally organized in classroom interaction. While prior ethnomethodological conversation analytic (EMCA) research has examined how instructions are produced through talk, embodied demonstration, and material resources, less attention has been paid to how instruction shifts between distal, non-contiguous framing and immediate, contiguous procedural enactments. The data consist of 10 hours of video-recorded interaction from two settings: Swedish for Immigrants (SFI) language classrooms and STEM (mathematics/physics) courses in upper secondary education. Using EMCA, the data show how teachers and students collaboratively move between framing instructions and proceduring them through embodied, material, and spatially organized action. Instructional work unfolds along a continuum between non-contiguous instruction, where rules and principles are introduced in advance, and contiguous instruction, where instruction and enactment are laminated into the same interactional sequence. The findings demonstrate that instructional clarity is not achieved through instruction-giving alone, but through practices such as parsing, staging, and embodied directives, whereby teachers guide instruction-following through teaching-by-doing. By comparing whole-group and small-group interaction across language and STEM classrooms, the study clarifies how temporal sequencing and multimodality jointly produce instructional order and contributes to EMCA research on instruction in educational settings.
连续和非连续的指示行动:在群组组织的整体小组和小组课堂互动中,边做边教
本研究探讨教学实践是如何在课堂互动中以时间和多模式组织的。虽然先前的民族方法学会话分析(EMCA)研究考察了指令是如何通过谈话、具体化演示和物质资源产生的,但很少关注指令是如何在远端、非连续框架和直接、连续程序性行为之间转换的。这些数据包括来自两种环境的10小时视频互动:移民瑞典语(SFI)语言教室和高中教育中的STEM(数学/物理)课程。使用EMCA,数据显示了教师和学生如何通过具体的、材料的和空间组织的行动在框架指令和程序指令之间协作移动。教学工作沿着非连续教学和连续教学之间的连续体展开,在非连续教学中,规则和原则是预先引入的,而在连续教学中,教学和制定被分层成相同的相互作用序列。研究结果表明,教学清晰度不是通过单独的教学来实现的,而是通过分析、分期和具体化指令等实践来实现的,教师通过实践教学来引导教学遵循。通过比较语言教室和STEM教室的整体小组和小组互动,该研究阐明了时间排序和多模态如何共同产生教学秩序,并有助于教育环境中教学的EMCA研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Linguistics and Education encourages submissions that apply theory and method from all areas of linguistics to the study of education. Areas of linguistic study include, but are not limited to: text/corpus linguistics, sociolinguistics, functional grammar, discourse analysis, critical discourse analysis, conversational analysis, linguistic anthropology/ethnography, language acquisition, language socialization, narrative studies, gesture/ sign /visual forms of communication, cognitive linguistics, literacy studies, language policy, and language ideology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书