Bridging the digital divide? Effects of analog and digital reading interventions in German elementary schools

IF 5.7 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Learning and Instruction Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-11 DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102324
Jana Heinz , Franz Neuberger , Laura Eras , Uta Hauck-Thum
{"title":"Bridging the digital divide? Effects of analog and digital reading interventions in German elementary schools","authors":"Jana Heinz ,&nbsp;Franz Neuberger ,&nbsp;Laura Eras ,&nbsp;Uta Hauck-Thum","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>School systems are facing challenges in providing children with reading competence necessary for participating in a digital society while meeting the needs of an increasingly diverse student population. Educational inequalities persist, and are intensified by the digital divide, which shapes access to, use of, and benefit from digital media.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>We examine how students' socioeconomic background influences their access to and use of digital media, and how these factors relate to their reading development in a reading intervention, implemented in analog and digital contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>Participants were 249 elementary students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study involved a six-month reading intervention in three elementary schools. Classes were assigned to analog, digital, or control conditions. The intervention combined fluency practice, collaborative comprehension tasks, and creative activities. Pre- and post-test measures, including tests and questionnaires, were employed. Data were analyzed using a multi-step design incorporating descriptive tables, regression, and fixed-effects panel models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall intervention effects on reading competence were modest. The analog intervention showed small positive effects, while the digital format produced less consistent results. Effectiveness varies by school context, parental education, and language background. High levels of digital media use at home correlated with lower reading competence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The success of reading interventions depends less on the medium than on scaffolding, teacher implementation, and alignment with students’ starting skills. Students from highly educated families tended to benefit more, while digital familiarity alone did not confer an advantage. These results highlight the need for context-sensitive designs that address inequalities in both analog and digital learning environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102324"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475226000095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

School systems are facing challenges in providing children with reading competence necessary for participating in a digital society while meeting the needs of an increasingly diverse student population. Educational inequalities persist, and are intensified by the digital divide, which shapes access to, use of, and benefit from digital media.

Aims

We examine how students' socioeconomic background influences their access to and use of digital media, and how these factors relate to their reading development in a reading intervention, implemented in analog and digital contexts.

Sample

Participants were 249 elementary students.

Methods

The study involved a six-month reading intervention in three elementary schools. Classes were assigned to analog, digital, or control conditions. The intervention combined fluency practice, collaborative comprehension tasks, and creative activities. Pre- and post-test measures, including tests and questionnaires, were employed. Data were analyzed using a multi-step design incorporating descriptive tables, regression, and fixed-effects panel models.

Results

Overall intervention effects on reading competence were modest. The analog intervention showed small positive effects, while the digital format produced less consistent results. Effectiveness varies by school context, parental education, and language background. High levels of digital media use at home correlated with lower reading competence.

Conclusion

The success of reading interventions depends less on the medium than on scaffolding, teacher implementation, and alignment with students’ starting skills. Students from highly educated families tended to benefit more, while digital familiarity alone did not confer an advantage. These results highlight the need for context-sensitive designs that address inequalities in both analog and digital learning environments.
弥合数字鸿沟?模拟和数字阅读干预在德国小学的效果
学校系统在为儿童提供参与数字社会所需的阅读能力,同时满足日益多样化的学生群体的需求方面面临着挑战。教育不平等现象持续存在,并因数字鸿沟而加剧,数字鸿沟影响着数字媒体的获取、使用和受益。目的研究学生的社会经济背景如何影响他们获取和使用数字媒体,以及这些因素如何与他们在模拟和数字环境中实施的阅读干预中的阅读发展相关。样本对象为249名小学生。方法对三所小学进行为期六个月的阅读干预。班级被分配到模拟、数字或控制条件下。干预包括流利练习、协作理解任务和创造性活动。测试前和测试后的措施,包括测试和问卷调查。数据分析采用多步骤设计,包括描述性表、回归和固定效应面板模型。结果干预对阅读能力的总体影响不显著。模拟干预显示出很小的积极效果,而数字格式产生的结果不太一致。效果因学校环境、父母教育和语言背景而异。在家使用高水平的数字媒体与较低的阅读能力相关。结论阅读干预的成功与其说取决于媒介,不如说取决于脚手架、教师的实施以及与学生的起始技能的一致性。来自受过高等教育家庭的学生往往受益更多,而仅仅熟悉数字并不能带来优势。这些结果突出了上下文敏感设计的必要性,以解决模拟和数字学习环境中的不平等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书