Jana Heinz , Franz Neuberger , Laura Eras , Uta Hauck-Thum
{"title":"Bridging the digital divide? Effects of analog and digital reading interventions in German elementary schools","authors":"Jana Heinz , Franz Neuberger , Laura Eras , Uta Hauck-Thum","doi":"10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>School systems are facing challenges in providing children with reading competence necessary for participating in a digital society while meeting the needs of an increasingly diverse student population. Educational inequalities persist, and are intensified by the digital divide, which shapes access to, use of, and benefit from digital media.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>We examine how students' socioeconomic background influences their access to and use of digital media, and how these factors relate to their reading development in a reading intervention, implemented in analog and digital contexts.</div></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><div>Participants were 249 elementary students.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study involved a six-month reading intervention in three elementary schools. Classes were assigned to analog, digital, or control conditions. The intervention combined fluency practice, collaborative comprehension tasks, and creative activities. Pre- and post-test measures, including tests and questionnaires, were employed. Data were analyzed using a multi-step design incorporating descriptive tables, regression, and fixed-effects panel models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall intervention effects on reading competence were modest. The analog intervention showed small positive effects, while the digital format produced less consistent results. Effectiveness varies by school context, parental education, and language background. High levels of digital media use at home correlated with lower reading competence.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The success of reading interventions depends less on the medium than on scaffolding, teacher implementation, and alignment with students’ starting skills. Students from highly educated families tended to benefit more, while digital familiarity alone did not confer an advantage. These results highlight the need for context-sensitive designs that address inequalities in both analog and digital learning environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48357,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Instruction","volume":"103 ","pages":"Article 102324"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475226000095","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
School systems are facing challenges in providing children with reading competence necessary for participating in a digital society while meeting the needs of an increasingly diverse student population. Educational inequalities persist, and are intensified by the digital divide, which shapes access to, use of, and benefit from digital media.
Aims
We examine how students' socioeconomic background influences their access to and use of digital media, and how these factors relate to their reading development in a reading intervention, implemented in analog and digital contexts.
Sample
Participants were 249 elementary students.
Methods
The study involved a six-month reading intervention in three elementary schools. Classes were assigned to analog, digital, or control conditions. The intervention combined fluency practice, collaborative comprehension tasks, and creative activities. Pre- and post-test measures, including tests and questionnaires, were employed. Data were analyzed using a multi-step design incorporating descriptive tables, regression, and fixed-effects panel models.
Results
Overall intervention effects on reading competence were modest. The analog intervention showed small positive effects, while the digital format produced less consistent results. Effectiveness varies by school context, parental education, and language background. High levels of digital media use at home correlated with lower reading competence.
Conclusion
The success of reading interventions depends less on the medium than on scaffolding, teacher implementation, and alignment with students’ starting skills. Students from highly educated families tended to benefit more, while digital familiarity alone did not confer an advantage. These results highlight the need for context-sensitive designs that address inequalities in both analog and digital learning environments.
期刊介绍:
As an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-refereed journal, Learning and Instruction provides a platform for the publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of learning, development, instruction and teaching. The journal welcomes original empirical investigations. The papers may represent a variety of theoretical perspectives and different methodological approaches. They may refer to any age level, from infants to adults and to a diversity of learning and instructional settings, from laboratory experiments to field studies. The major criteria in the review and the selection process concern the significance of the contribution to the area of learning and instruction, and the rigor of the study.