Job Precarity and Attitudes Towards Labour Unions: The Mitigating Role of Immigrant Background

IF 1.8 2区 管理学 Q3 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Anna-Lena Nadler, Elif Naz Kayran
{"title":"Job Precarity and Attitudes Towards Labour Unions: The Mitigating Role of Immigrant Background","authors":"Anna-Lena Nadler,&nbsp;Elif Naz Kayran","doi":"10.1111/bjir.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite their significant and growing role in the European workforce, to date, little research attention has been paid to immigrant workers’ attitudes towards trade unions and provided mixed results. On the one hand, immigrants are expected to be more positive towards unions due to their lower economic capital and greater need for job protection. On the other hand, immigrants may hold more pessimistic attitudes towards unions because of their reduced social network, lower perceived benefits of collective action and unions’ historical aversion to immigrant workers. Here, we contribute to this understudied field of research by concentrating on increasing job precarity in non-standard employment forms which is highly concentrated among immigrant workers. More specifically, we ask to what extent does the internationalization of the workforce and the increasing presence of non-standard employment relate to attitudes towards trade unions in advanced democracies? We argue that immigrants in precarious employment face a double vulnerability where the distinct importance of the workplace for the social and political integration of immigrants, the reinforcement of pre-existing immigrant-specific labour market discrimination, and the link between employment and residence status could explain why job precarity has particularly negative effects on immigrants´view of unions compared to natives. Using an original survey data from 13 Western European countries, we show that while immigrant status alone is not a predictor of attitudes towards unions, immigrants in temporary contracts have significantly more adverse attitudes towards unions than those immigrants in permanent contracts. Importantly, when compared with native workers, there is a wider cleavage in attitudes towards unions among immigrant workers based on the precarity of their employment status, highlighting this clear intersection of immigrant status and employment precarity in shaping attitudes towards unions. Our findings highlight a crucial issue that needs to be addressed for the future sustainability of social dialogue and industrial relations in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":47846,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","volume":"64 1","pages":"182-193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjir.70024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Industrial Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjir.70024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite their significant and growing role in the European workforce, to date, little research attention has been paid to immigrant workers’ attitudes towards trade unions and provided mixed results. On the one hand, immigrants are expected to be more positive towards unions due to their lower economic capital and greater need for job protection. On the other hand, immigrants may hold more pessimistic attitudes towards unions because of their reduced social network, lower perceived benefits of collective action and unions’ historical aversion to immigrant workers. Here, we contribute to this understudied field of research by concentrating on increasing job precarity in non-standard employment forms which is highly concentrated among immigrant workers. More specifically, we ask to what extent does the internationalization of the workforce and the increasing presence of non-standard employment relate to attitudes towards trade unions in advanced democracies? We argue that immigrants in precarious employment face a double vulnerability where the distinct importance of the workplace for the social and political integration of immigrants, the reinforcement of pre-existing immigrant-specific labour market discrimination, and the link between employment and residence status could explain why job precarity has particularly negative effects on immigrants´view of unions compared to natives. Using an original survey data from 13 Western European countries, we show that while immigrant status alone is not a predictor of attitudes towards unions, immigrants in temporary contracts have significantly more adverse attitudes towards unions than those immigrants in permanent contracts. Importantly, when compared with native workers, there is a wider cleavage in attitudes towards unions among immigrant workers based on the precarity of their employment status, highlighting this clear intersection of immigrant status and employment precarity in shaping attitudes towards unions. Our findings highlight a crucial issue that needs to be addressed for the future sustainability of social dialogue and industrial relations in Europe.

Abstract Image

工作不稳定性与对工会的态度:移民背景的缓和作用
尽管移民工人在欧洲劳动力中扮演着重要且日益重要的角色,但迄今为止,很少有研究关注移民工人对工会的态度,结果好坏参半。一方面,由于移民的经济资本较低,对就业保护的需求更大,预计他们对工会的态度会更积极。另一方面,移民可能对工会持更悲观的态度,因为他们的社会网络较少,集体行动的感知效益较低,工会对移民工人的历史厌恶。在这里,我们通过专注于增加非标准就业形式的工作不稳定性,这高度集中在移民工人中,为这个研究不足的领域做出了贡献。更具体地说,我们要问,在发达民主国家,劳动力的国际化和非标准就业的日益增加与对工会的态度有多大关系?我们认为,不稳定就业的移民面临双重脆弱性,其中工作场所对移民的社会和政治融合的独特重要性,先前存在的移民特定劳动力市场歧视的加强,以及就业和居留身份之间的联系可以解释为什么与本地人相比,工作不稳定对移民对工会的看法有特别负面的影响。使用来自13个西欧国家的原始调查数据,我们表明,虽然移民身份本身并不是对工会态度的预测因素,但临时合同的移民对工会的态度明显比永久合同的移民更不利。重要的是,与本地工人相比,移民工人对工会的态度存在更大的分歧,这是基于他们就业状况的不稳定性,突出了移民身份和就业不稳定性在塑造对工会的态度方面的明显交集。我们的研究结果突出了欧洲社会对话和工业关系未来可持续性需要解决的一个关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Industrial Relations
British Journal of Industrial Relations INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: BJIR (British Journal of Industrial Relations) is an influential and authoritative journal which is essential reading for all academics and practitioners interested in work and employment relations. It is the highest ranked European journal in the Industrial Relations & Labour category of the Social Sciences Citation Index. BJIR aims to present the latest research on developments on employment and work from across the globe that appeal to an international readership. Contributions are drawn from all of the main social science disciplines, deal with a broad range of employment topics and express a range of viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书