Climate change impact on envelope retrofit effectiveness: energy and carbon performance of Italian residential and office buildings today vs. 2050

IF 8 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Energy and Buildings Pub Date : 2026-04-15 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117145
Francesca Villano , Fabrizio Ascione , Tomasz Cholewa , Rosa Francesca De Masi , Gerardo Maria Mauro , Silvia Ruggiero
{"title":"Climate change impact on envelope retrofit effectiveness: energy and carbon performance of Italian residential and office buildings today vs. 2050","authors":"Francesca Villano ,&nbsp;Fabrizio Ascione ,&nbsp;Tomasz Cholewa ,&nbsp;Rosa Francesca De Masi ,&nbsp;Gerardo Maria Mauro ,&nbsp;Silvia Ruggiero","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Buildings significantly contribute to global energy consumption and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, and their performance is increasingly challenged by rising cooling demands under climate change. While many studies assess envelope retrofit measures, most focus on a single building use. This study addresses this gap through a comparative analysis across building typologies, uses, and climatic conditions. The effects of climate change and envelope retrofit strategies on thermal energy demand (TED) and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions are evaluated for four representative Italian building typologies—apartment block, multifamily building, terraced house, and single-family house—considering residential and office uses, standard and high internal loads, and current and 2050 climate conditions. Dynamic simulations are performed using EnergyPlus for four Italian climatic zones. Several retrofit options are analyzed, including insulation measures, window replacement, cool roofs, and a global retrofit. The global retrofit provides the largest benefits, reducing TED and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions by up to 65% and 60% under current conditions, with a slight decrease in effectiveness (2–4%) toward 2050. Office buildings with high internal loads show smaller improvements than residential ones. Compact buildings exhibit greater climate resilience, whereas less compact typologies experience larger performance declines. Cool roofs are effective in mitigating cooling-related emissions under warmer climates, though their impact is limited in high-load office scenarios. Results highlight the need for adaptive and climate-resilient retrofit strategies in Mediterranean contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"357 ","pages":"Article 117145"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778826002057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Buildings significantly contribute to global energy consumption and CO2 emissions, and their performance is increasingly challenged by rising cooling demands under climate change. While many studies assess envelope retrofit measures, most focus on a single building use. This study addresses this gap through a comparative analysis across building typologies, uses, and climatic conditions. The effects of climate change and envelope retrofit strategies on thermal energy demand (TED) and CO2 emissions are evaluated for four representative Italian building typologies—apartment block, multifamily building, terraced house, and single-family house—considering residential and office uses, standard and high internal loads, and current and 2050 climate conditions. Dynamic simulations are performed using EnergyPlus for four Italian climatic zones. Several retrofit options are analyzed, including insulation measures, window replacement, cool roofs, and a global retrofit. The global retrofit provides the largest benefits, reducing TED and CO2 emissions by up to 65% and 60% under current conditions, with a slight decrease in effectiveness (2–4%) toward 2050. Office buildings with high internal loads show smaller improvements than residential ones. Compact buildings exhibit greater climate resilience, whereas less compact typologies experience larger performance declines. Cool roofs are effective in mitigating cooling-related emissions under warmer climates, though their impact is limited in high-load office scenarios. Results highlight the need for adaptive and climate-resilient retrofit strategies in Mediterranean contexts.
气候变化对围护结构改造效果的影响:今天与2050年意大利住宅和办公楼的能源和碳性能
建筑对全球能源消耗和二氧化碳排放做出了重大贡献,在气候变化的背景下,其性能受到日益增长的冷却需求的挑战。虽然许多研究评估了围护结构改造措施,但大多数研究都集中在单一建筑的使用上。本研究通过对建筑类型、用途和气候条件的比较分析来解决这一差距。气候变化和围护结构改造策略对热能需求(TED)和二氧化碳排放的影响评估了四种具有代表性的意大利建筑类型——公寓楼、多户建筑、排屋和单户住宅——考虑到住宅和办公用途、标准和高内部负荷,以及当前和2050年的气候条件。使用EnergyPlus对意大利的四个气候带进行了动态模拟。分析了几种改造方案,包括隔热措施、窗户更换、冷却屋顶和全球改造。全球改造提供了最大的效益,在目前的条件下,减少了高达65%和60%的TED和CO2排放,到2050年的有效性略有下降(2-4%)。内部负荷较大的办公楼的改善幅度小于住宅。紧凑型建筑表现出更强的气候适应能力,而紧凑型建筑的性能下降幅度更大。在气候变暖的情况下,凉爽的屋顶可以有效地减少与冷却有关的排放,尽管在高负荷的办公环境下,它们的影响有限。研究结果强调了地中海环境下适应性和气候适应性改造战略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书