Types of Tracking and Upward Mobility: Causal Effects on (Social Inequality in) Educational Attainment in The Netherlands

IF 3.6 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Per Bles, Melline Somers, Katarina Weßling
{"title":"Types of Tracking and Upward Mobility: Causal Effects on (Social Inequality in) Educational Attainment in The Netherlands","authors":"Per Bles,&nbsp;Melline Somers,&nbsp;Katarina Weßling","doi":"10.1111/ejed.70451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In contrast with other early-tracking education systems, schools in the Dutch system can provide several combinations of school tracks during the first years of secondary school. We study how the attended type of track(s) affects students' chances of obtaining a pre-academic school certificate. Our target group is students just below the margin of entering the pre-academic track. We differentiate between strict tracking and two forms of mixed tracking, including either one pre-academic track (partly mixed) or both pre-academic tracks (broadly mixed). We examine whether our target group obtains a pre-academic degree directly or indirectly via stacking certificates. We use an instrumental variable (IV) approach to estimate causal effects. Our results show that students' are more likely to obtain a pre-academic certificate when they attend mixed tracks that allow for upward mobility, i.e., comprise a pre-academic track. High-SES students are more likely to attain a pre-academic certificate indirectly via stacking certificates. We conclude that our nuanced analysis contributes towards a better understanding of the causal effects of tracking on individual student outcomes. The downward trend in mixed tracks in the Netherlands should, from an attainment perspective, be encouraged to be reversed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejed.70451","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.70451","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In contrast with other early-tracking education systems, schools in the Dutch system can provide several combinations of school tracks during the first years of secondary school. We study how the attended type of track(s) affects students' chances of obtaining a pre-academic school certificate. Our target group is students just below the margin of entering the pre-academic track. We differentiate between strict tracking and two forms of mixed tracking, including either one pre-academic track (partly mixed) or both pre-academic tracks (broadly mixed). We examine whether our target group obtains a pre-academic degree directly or indirectly via stacking certificates. We use an instrumental variable (IV) approach to estimate causal effects. Our results show that students' are more likely to obtain a pre-academic certificate when they attend mixed tracks that allow for upward mobility, i.e., comprise a pre-academic track. High-SES students are more likely to attain a pre-academic certificate indirectly via stacking certificates. We conclude that our nuanced analysis contributes towards a better understanding of the causal effects of tracking on individual student outcomes. The downward trend in mixed tracks in the Netherlands should, from an attainment perspective, be encouraged to be reversed.

Abstract Image

跟踪类型和向上流动:荷兰教育成就(社会不平等)的因果影响
与其他早期跟踪教育系统相比,荷兰系统中的学校可以在中学第一年提供多种学校跟踪组合。我们研究参加的课程类型如何影响学生获得学前教育学校证书的机会。我们的目标群体是刚刚进入预科阶段的学生。我们区分严格跟踪和两种形式的混合跟踪,包括一个学前跟踪(部分混合)或两个学前跟踪(广泛混合)。我们检查我们的目标群体是否直接或间接地通过堆叠证书获得预科学位。我们使用工具变量(IV)方法来估计因果关系。我们的研究结果表明,当学生参加允许向上流动的混合课程时,他们更有可能获得预科证书,即包括预科课程。高ses的学生更有可能通过堆叠证书间接获得预科证书。我们的结论是,我们细致入微的分析有助于更好地理解跟踪对个别学生成绩的因果影响。从成绩的角度来看,应鼓励扭转荷兰混合课程的下降趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书