Is It the Content or the Gossiper's Behaviour While Evaluating Gossip for Children?

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Muhammed Sukru Aydin
{"title":"Is It the Content or the Gossiper's Behaviour While Evaluating Gossip for Children?","authors":"Muhammed Sukru Aydin","doi":"10.1002/icd.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Gossip is a crucial social cognitive skill that individuals encounter from early childhood and continues to play a significant role in daily life throughout different stages of development. While gossip is often associated with negative connotations, it is defined as the sharing of information about a third party who is not present. As a result, the valence of gossip—whether positive or negative—depends on the content being shared. Additionally, the behaviour of the person sharing the gossip can influence our judgement of the situation. In light of this, the present study explored how the content of gossip and the prosocial or antisocial behaviours of the gossiper affect the evaluations of children. The study involved 93 children, 50 of whom were girls, with ages ranging from 4 to 6 years (<i>M</i> age = 5.01 years). The participants were initially presented with vignettes using picture cards, in which the gossiper displayed either prosocial or antisocial behaviour. Following this, they were introduced to additional vignettes in which the gossiper shared information with either positive or negative content. In total, four distinct conditions were created: prosocial behaviour with negative gossip, prosocial behaviour with positive gossip, antisocial behaviour with negative gossip, and antisocial behaviour with positive gossip. The findings of the study revealed that children aged 4 to 6 tend to focus on the positive content of the gossip in their evaluations. However, when considering the behaviour of the gossiper, the prosocial or antisocial nature of the gossiper's actions had a greater influence on their judgement than the content of the gossip itself. The results are discussed in terms of how the impact of gossip content and the gossiper's behaviour varies with age.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47820,"journal":{"name":"Infant and Child Development","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant and Child Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.70086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gossip is a crucial social cognitive skill that individuals encounter from early childhood and continues to play a significant role in daily life throughout different stages of development. While gossip is often associated with negative connotations, it is defined as the sharing of information about a third party who is not present. As a result, the valence of gossip—whether positive or negative—depends on the content being shared. Additionally, the behaviour of the person sharing the gossip can influence our judgement of the situation. In light of this, the present study explored how the content of gossip and the prosocial or antisocial behaviours of the gossiper affect the evaluations of children. The study involved 93 children, 50 of whom were girls, with ages ranging from 4 to 6 years (M age = 5.01 years). The participants were initially presented with vignettes using picture cards, in which the gossiper displayed either prosocial or antisocial behaviour. Following this, they were introduced to additional vignettes in which the gossiper shared information with either positive or negative content. In total, four distinct conditions were created: prosocial behaviour with negative gossip, prosocial behaviour with positive gossip, antisocial behaviour with negative gossip, and antisocial behaviour with positive gossip. The findings of the study revealed that children aged 4 to 6 tend to focus on the positive content of the gossip in their evaluations. However, when considering the behaviour of the gossiper, the prosocial or antisocial nature of the gossiper's actions had a greater influence on their judgement than the content of the gossip itself. The results are discussed in terms of how the impact of gossip content and the gossiper's behaviour varies with age.

评价儿童八卦是内容还是行为?
八卦是一种重要的社会认知技能,个体从童年早期就开始接触,并在不同的发展阶段继续在日常生活中发挥重要作用。虽然八卦通常与负面含义联系在一起,但它被定义为分享不在场的第三方的信息。因此,八卦的价值——无论是积极的还是消极的——取决于被分享的内容。此外,分享八卦的人的行为会影响我们对情况的判断。鉴于此,本研究探讨了八卦的内容以及八卦者的亲社会或反社会行为如何影响儿童的评价。该研究涉及93名儿童,其中50名是女孩,年龄在4至6岁之间(M年龄= 5.01岁)。起初,研究人员用图片卡向参与者展示了一些小故事,在这些小故事中,说闲话的人要么表现出亲社会行为,要么表现出反社会行为。在此之后,他们被介绍给额外的小插曲,在这些小插曲中,说长道短的人分享了积极或消极的信息。总共创造了四种不同的条件:亲社会行为伴负面八卦,亲社会行为伴积极八卦,反社会行为伴负面八卦,反社会行为伴积极八卦。研究结果显示,4到6岁的孩子在评价八卦时倾向于关注其积极的内容。然而,当考虑到说闲话者的行为时,说闲话者行为的亲社会或反社会性质比说闲话本身的内容对他们的判断有更大的影响。研究结果讨论了八卦内容和八卦者的行为随年龄变化的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infant and Child Development
Infant and Child Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Infant and Child Development publishes high quality empirical, theoretical and methodological papers addressing psychological development from the antenatal period through to adolescence. The journal brings together research on: - social and emotional development - perceptual and motor development - cognitive development - language development atypical development (including conduct problems, anxiety and depressive conditions, language impairments, autistic spectrum disorders, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书