Intelligence-based prediction of coefficient of performance for a novel high-temperature industrial heat pump: Comparative performance of ANN and ANFIS models

IF 8 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Energy and Buildings Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117078
Iman Golpour , José Daniel Marcos , Rubén Barbero , Antonio Rovira , Alex Butean , Arne Høeg
{"title":"Intelligence-based prediction of coefficient of performance for a novel high-temperature industrial heat pump: Comparative performance of ANN and ANFIS models","authors":"Iman Golpour ,&nbsp;José Daniel Marcos ,&nbsp;Rubén Barbero ,&nbsp;Antonio Rovira ,&nbsp;Alex Butean ,&nbsp;Arne Høeg","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comparative evaluation of the artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approaches for predicting the coefficient of performance (COP) of the HoegTemp, a high-temperature heat pump (HTHP) based on a Stirling cycle (SC) with a design heat capacity of 400 kW. Experimental tests were conducted at the IVAR biogas facility in Stavanger, Norway. This study employed a feedforward backpropagation neural network (FFBPNN) model with one and two hidden layers, with various numbers of neurons and three activation functions, as well as the ANFIS approach, to estimate the COP of the SC-HTHP. The FFBPNN model used the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and Bayesian regularization (BR) training algorithms, while the ANFIS model utilized a hybrid optimization method and grid partitioning. The ANN and ANFIS models were evaluated using the following input variables: temperature ratio (1.4–1.6 K/K), average source temperature (21–22 °C), average sink temperature (139–199 °C) and hot water inlet temperature (137–197 °C), with COP as the output variable. The results demonstrated that the FFBP-ANN model exhibited superior predictive accuracy compared to the ANFIS model, achieving R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9999, MSE = 0.00010, MAE = 0.00804, and RMSE = 0.01000, whereas the ANFIS approach resulted in R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9863, MSE = 0.00019, MAE = 0.01114, and RMSE = 0.01392. The optimal ANN topology was 4–23-16–1 with tansig–logsig–purelin activation functions. In contrast, the best membership functions selected for ANFIS were Gaussian for the input layer and constant for the output layer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"356 ","pages":"Article 117078"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778826001386","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a comparative evaluation of the artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approaches for predicting the coefficient of performance (COP) of the HoegTemp, a high-temperature heat pump (HTHP) based on a Stirling cycle (SC) with a design heat capacity of 400 kW. Experimental tests were conducted at the IVAR biogas facility in Stavanger, Norway. This study employed a feedforward backpropagation neural network (FFBPNN) model with one and two hidden layers, with various numbers of neurons and three activation functions, as well as the ANFIS approach, to estimate the COP of the SC-HTHP. The FFBPNN model used the Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) and Bayesian regularization (BR) training algorithms, while the ANFIS model utilized a hybrid optimization method and grid partitioning. The ANN and ANFIS models were evaluated using the following input variables: temperature ratio (1.4–1.6 K/K), average source temperature (21–22 °C), average sink temperature (139–199 °C) and hot water inlet temperature (137–197 °C), with COP as the output variable. The results demonstrated that the FFBP-ANN model exhibited superior predictive accuracy compared to the ANFIS model, achieving R2 = 0.9999, MSE = 0.00010, MAE = 0.00804, and RMSE = 0.01000, whereas the ANFIS approach resulted in R2 = 0.9863, MSE = 0.00019, MAE = 0.01114, and RMSE = 0.01392. The optimal ANN topology was 4–23-16–1 with tansig–logsig–purelin activation functions. In contrast, the best membership functions selected for ANFIS were Gaussian for the input layer and constant for the output layer.
基于智能的新型高温工业热泵性能系数预测:人工神经网络模型与ANFIS模型的性能比较
本研究比较了人工神经网络(ANN)和自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)两种方法对设计热容量为400 kW的高温热泵HoegTemp的性能系数(COP)的预测。在挪威斯塔万格的IVAR沼气设施进行了实验测试。本研究采用一层和两层隐层、不同数量神经元和三种激活函数的前馈反向传播神经网络(FFBPNN)模型,以及ANFIS方法来估计SC-HTHP的COP。FFBPNN模型采用Levenberg-Marquardt (LM)和Bayesian正则化(BR)训练算法,而ANFIS模型采用混合优化方法和网格划分。ANN和ANFIS模型使用以下输入变量进行评估:温度比(1.4-1.6 K/K)、平均源温度(21-22℃)、平均汇温度(139-199℃)和热水进口温度(137-197℃),COP为输出变量。结果表明,与ANFIS模型相比,FFBP-ANN模型的预测精度更高,R2 = 0.9999, MSE = 0.00010, MAE = 0.00804, RMSE = 0.01000,而ANFIS方法的预测精度为R2 = 0.9863, MSE = 0.00019, MAE = 0.01114, RMSE = 0.01392。最优ANN拓扑为4-23-16-1,具有tansg - log - purelin激活函数。相比之下,ANFIS选择的最佳隶属函数为输入层的高斯函数和输出层的常数函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书