{"title":"Social norms modulate asymmetric effects of group opinions on cue-induced smoking craving","authors":"Woojin Jung , HeeYoung Seon , Sunhae Sul , Dongil Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.addbeh.2026.108623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The social environment is an important predictor of smoking behavior. However, it remains unknown if social factors shape beliefs about whether certain cues trigger their urge to smoke, known as cue-induced smoking craving. Across two studies (total N = 300), we investigated whether group opinions influence cue-induced smoking craving in current- and past-smokers. Individuals rated their level of craving for each presented image, followed by exposure to group opinions. In Study 1, we found that individuals’ smoking craving shifted in response to group opinions, with stronger conformity to lower group opinions compared with equal or higher group opinions. Study 2, a pre-registered follow-up study, replicated these findings and further demonstrated that biased social norms modulate the degree of social influence on smoking craving. Specifically, individuals conformed more to low group opinions when biased social norms favored low ratings, and to high group opinions when norms favored high ratings. Our data demonstrate that group opinions can influence cue-induced smoking craving, highlighting the pivotal role of the social environment in shaping smoking-related beliefs and, consequently, smoking behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7155,"journal":{"name":"Addictive behaviors","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 108623"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addictive behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460326000304","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The social environment is an important predictor of smoking behavior. However, it remains unknown if social factors shape beliefs about whether certain cues trigger their urge to smoke, known as cue-induced smoking craving. Across two studies (total N = 300), we investigated whether group opinions influence cue-induced smoking craving in current- and past-smokers. Individuals rated their level of craving for each presented image, followed by exposure to group opinions. In Study 1, we found that individuals’ smoking craving shifted in response to group opinions, with stronger conformity to lower group opinions compared with equal or higher group opinions. Study 2, a pre-registered follow-up study, replicated these findings and further demonstrated that biased social norms modulate the degree of social influence on smoking craving. Specifically, individuals conformed more to low group opinions when biased social norms favored low ratings, and to high group opinions when norms favored high ratings. Our data demonstrate that group opinions can influence cue-induced smoking craving, highlighting the pivotal role of the social environment in shaping smoking-related beliefs and, consequently, smoking behavior.
期刊介绍:
Addictive Behaviors is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality human research on addictive behaviors and disorders since 1975. The journal accepts submissions of full-length papers and short communications on substance-related addictions such as the abuse of alcohol, drugs and nicotine, and behavioral addictions involving gambling and technology. We primarily publish behavioral and psychosocial research but our articles span the fields of psychology, sociology, psychiatry, epidemiology, social policy, medicine, pharmacology and neuroscience. While theoretical orientations are diverse, the emphasis of the journal is primarily empirical. That is, sound experimental design combined with valid, reliable assessment and evaluation procedures are a requisite for acceptance. However, innovative and empirically oriented case studies that might encourage new lines of inquiry are accepted as well. Studies that clearly contribute to current knowledge of etiology, prevention, social policy or treatment are given priority. Scholarly commentaries on topical issues, systematic reviews, and mini reviews are encouraged. We especially welcome multimedia papers that incorporate video or audio components to better display methodology or findings.
Studies can also be submitted to Addictive Behaviors? companion title, the open access journal Addictive Behaviors Reports, which has a particular interest in ''non-traditional'', innovative and empirically-oriented research such as negative/null data papers, replication studies, case reports on novel treatments, and cross-cultural research.