A collaborative study to validate in vitro assays for protein digestibility assessment using pH-drop and pH-stat methods

IF 4.6 2区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jfca.2026.108918
Erin M. Goldberg , Amanda G.A. Sá , Adam J. Franczyk , Elaine S. Krul , Barbara Lyle , Mingyan Jing , Fiona Liu , Xin Wu , Nandika Bandara , Guillaume Brisson , Vicenta Garcia Campayo , Lingyun Chen , Sharon Hooper , Lamia L'Hocine , Mike Nickerson , Matthew Nosworthy , James D. House
{"title":"A collaborative study to validate in vitro assays for protein digestibility assessment using pH-drop and pH-stat methods","authors":"Erin M. Goldberg ,&nbsp;Amanda G.A. Sá ,&nbsp;Adam J. Franczyk ,&nbsp;Elaine S. Krul ,&nbsp;Barbara Lyle ,&nbsp;Mingyan Jing ,&nbsp;Fiona Liu ,&nbsp;Xin Wu ,&nbsp;Nandika Bandara ,&nbsp;Guillaume Brisson ,&nbsp;Vicenta Garcia Campayo ,&nbsp;Lingyun Chen ,&nbsp;Sharon Hooper ,&nbsp;Lamia L'Hocine ,&nbsp;Mike Nickerson ,&nbsp;Matthew Nosworthy ,&nbsp;James D. House","doi":"10.1016/j.jfca.2026.108918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The diversification of protein sources used in food formulation has increased the need to assess protein quality beyond traditional food forms. Protein digestibility is a key component of the Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS), the regulatory metric derived from rodent bioassays. Ethical concerns and the high cost of animal testing limit the ability of food formulators to screen protein ingredients and evaluate processing effects on digestibility. Findings from an international collaborative study are presented to position two <em>in vitro</em> methods, the pH-drop and pH-stat assays, as accredited approaches for determining protein digestibility. Nine laboratories participated in the study and analyzed 12 protein ingredients. Relative standard deviations for repeatability ranged from 0.8 to 2.1 % and 0.5–4.8 %, while reproducibility ranged from 1.2 to 3.6 % and 1.1–4.9 % for the pH-drop and pH-stat methods, respectively. Comparison between the two assays demonstrated strong correlation and moderate agreement, with the pH-stat assay yielding slightly lower digestibility values. <em>In vitro</em> protein digestibility coefficients aligned well with literature reported true faecal protein digestibility values for comparable, non-identical protein ingredients. Both methods received official AOCS Uniform Methods Committee approval, offering simple, affordable, reliable, and ethical tools to support informed decisions on protein digestibility during food formulation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15867,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 108918"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Composition and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088915752600061X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diversification of protein sources used in food formulation has increased the need to assess protein quality beyond traditional food forms. Protein digestibility is a key component of the Protein Digestibility Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS), the regulatory metric derived from rodent bioassays. Ethical concerns and the high cost of animal testing limit the ability of food formulators to screen protein ingredients and evaluate processing effects on digestibility. Findings from an international collaborative study are presented to position two in vitro methods, the pH-drop and pH-stat assays, as accredited approaches for determining protein digestibility. Nine laboratories participated in the study and analyzed 12 protein ingredients. Relative standard deviations for repeatability ranged from 0.8 to 2.1 % and 0.5–4.8 %, while reproducibility ranged from 1.2 to 3.6 % and 1.1–4.9 % for the pH-drop and pH-stat methods, respectively. Comparison between the two assays demonstrated strong correlation and moderate agreement, with the pH-stat assay yielding slightly lower digestibility values. In vitro protein digestibility coefficients aligned well with literature reported true faecal protein digestibility values for comparable, non-identical protein ingredients. Both methods received official AOCS Uniform Methods Committee approval, offering simple, affordable, reliable, and ethical tools to support informed decisions on protein digestibility during food formulation.
利用pH-drop和pH-stat方法验证体外蛋白质消化率评估的合作研究
食品配方中使用的蛋白质来源的多样化增加了评估传统食品形式以外的蛋白质质量的需要。蛋白质消化率是蛋白质消化率校正氨基酸评分(PDCAAS)的关键组成部分,PDCAAS是来自啮齿动物生物测定的调节指标。伦理问题和动物试验的高成本限制了食品配方师筛选蛋白质成分和评估加工对消化率的影响的能力。一项国际合作研究的结果提出了定位两种体外方法,pH-drop和pH-stat测定,作为确定蛋白质消化率的认可方法。9个实验室参与了这项研究,分析了12种蛋白质成分。重复性的相对标准偏差为0.8 ~ 2.1 %和0.5 ~ 4.8 %,pH-drop法和pH-stat法的重复性为1.2 ~ 3.6 %和1.1 ~ 4.9 %。两种测定法之间的比较显示出很强的相关性和适度的一致性,pH-stat测定法产生的消化率值略低。体外蛋白质消化率系数与文献报道的可比较的、不相同的蛋白质成分的真实粪便蛋白质消化率值一致。这两种方法都获得了AOCS统一方法委员会的正式批准,提供了简单、负担得起、可靠和合乎道德的工具,以支持在食品配方过程中对蛋白质消化率的知情决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis
Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.60%
发文量
601
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Composition and Analysis publishes manuscripts on scientific aspects of data on the chemical composition of human foods, with particular emphasis on actual data on composition of foods; analytical methods; studies on the manipulation, storage, distribution and use of food composition data; and studies on the statistics, use and distribution of such data and data systems. The Journal''s basis is nutrient composition, with increasing emphasis on bioactive non-nutrient and anti-nutrient components. Papers must provide sufficient description of the food samples, analytical methods, quality control procedures and statistical treatments of the data to permit the end users of the food composition data to evaluate the appropriateness of such data in their projects. The Journal does not publish papers on: microbiological compounds; sensory quality; aromatics/volatiles in food and wine; essential oils; organoleptic characteristics of food; physical properties; or clinical papers and pharmacology-related papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书