The influence of positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement and exposure on children's food intake and liking

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Appetite Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2026.108469
Britt Fleischeuer, Rosalie Mourmans, Pauline Dibbets, Katrijn Houben, Anouk E.M. Hendriks-Hartensveld, Anouk J.P. van den Brand, Ilse van Lier, Chantal Nederkoorn
{"title":"The influence of positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement and exposure on children's food intake and liking","authors":"Britt Fleischeuer,&nbsp;Rosalie Mourmans,&nbsp;Pauline Dibbets,&nbsp;Katrijn Houben,&nbsp;Anouk E.M. Hendriks-Hartensveld,&nbsp;Anouk J.P. van den Brand,&nbsp;Ilse van Lier,&nbsp;Chantal Nederkoorn","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2026.108469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Young children often consume too few fruits and vegetables, partly due to picky eating. While repeated exposure can improve acceptance, the added value of reinforcement strategies remains unclear. This pre-registered within-subject study investigated whether combining exposure with positive or negative reinforcement (using non-food rewards) enhances intake and liking of unfamiliar vegetables compared to exposure alone or a control condition. Sixty-two children aged 4–6 years participated in a 10-day school-based intervention involving all four conditions: positive reinforcement (tasting earned a cartoon card), negative reinforcement (tasting prevented card loss), exposure (tasting without rewards), and a control condition. Intake and liking of four unfamiliar vegetables (purple carrot, yellow beetroot, blue meat radish, and rutabaga) were measured on days 1 and 10, with intake also recorded during the intervention (days 2–9). Conditions and vegetable order were counterbalanced. The potential influences of reward sensitivity (RS) and punishment sensitivity (PS), and picky eating were also examined. Results from repeated-measures ANOVAs showed that positive reinforcement led to the highest post-intervention intake, followed by negative reinforcement, exposure, and control, with significant differences between all conditions. For liking, only positive reinforcement showed a significant improvement over the other conditions. RS and PS did not moderate outcomes, but higher picky eating was associated with lower intake and liking across all conditions. In conclusion, adding positive reinforcement to exposure most effectively increases young children's intake and liking of unfamiliar vegetables. This low-cost, easily implementable strategy can support parents and educators in promoting healthier eating habits in early childhood.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 108469"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666326000309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young children often consume too few fruits and vegetables, partly due to picky eating. While repeated exposure can improve acceptance, the added value of reinforcement strategies remains unclear. This pre-registered within-subject study investigated whether combining exposure with positive or negative reinforcement (using non-food rewards) enhances intake and liking of unfamiliar vegetables compared to exposure alone or a control condition. Sixty-two children aged 4–6 years participated in a 10-day school-based intervention involving all four conditions: positive reinforcement (tasting earned a cartoon card), negative reinforcement (tasting prevented card loss), exposure (tasting without rewards), and a control condition. Intake and liking of four unfamiliar vegetables (purple carrot, yellow beetroot, blue meat radish, and rutabaga) were measured on days 1 and 10, with intake also recorded during the intervention (days 2–9). Conditions and vegetable order were counterbalanced. The potential influences of reward sensitivity (RS) and punishment sensitivity (PS), and picky eating were also examined. Results from repeated-measures ANOVAs showed that positive reinforcement led to the highest post-intervention intake, followed by negative reinforcement, exposure, and control, with significant differences between all conditions. For liking, only positive reinforcement showed a significant improvement over the other conditions. RS and PS did not moderate outcomes, but higher picky eating was associated with lower intake and liking across all conditions. In conclusion, adding positive reinforcement to exposure most effectively increases young children's intake and liking of unfamiliar vegetables. This low-cost, easily implementable strategy can support parents and educators in promoting healthier eating habits in early childhood.
正强化、负强化和暴露对儿童食物摄入和喜爱的影响
幼儿经常吃的水果和蔬菜太少,部分原因是挑食。虽然反复暴露可以提高接受度,但强化策略的附加价值尚不清楚。这项预先注册的受试者研究调查了与单独暴露或对照条件相比,暴露与积极或消极强化(使用非食物奖励)相结合是否会增加对不熟悉蔬菜的摄入量和喜爱。62名4-6岁的儿童参加了为期10天的学校干预,涉及所有四种条件:积极强化(品尝获得卡通卡),消极强化(品尝防止卡片丢失),暴露(品尝没有奖励)和控制条件。在第1天和第10天测量了四种不熟悉的蔬菜(紫色胡萝卜、黄色甜菜根、蓝肉萝卜和芜菁甘蓝)的摄入量和喜欢程度,并在干预期间(第2-9天)记录了摄入量。条件和蔬菜的顺序是平衡的。此外,还考察了奖励敏感性(RS)、惩罚敏感性(PS)和挑食的潜在影响。重复测量方差分析的结果显示,正强化导致干预后摄入最高,其次是负强化、暴露和对照,所有条件之间存在显著差异。对于喜欢,只有正强化比其他条件有显著的改善。RS和PS对结果没有影响,但在所有情况下,高挑食与低摄入量和喜欢程度有关。总之,在暴露中加入正强化最有效地增加了幼儿的摄入量和对不熟悉蔬菜的喜爱。这种低成本、易于实施的战略可以支持家长和教育工作者在幼儿时期促进更健康的饮食习惯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书