12-Step Participation Is Linked to Lower Drinking and Specific Impulsive Personality Traits in Early Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-19 DOI:10.15288/jsad.25-00169
Emily E Levitt, Kyla L Belisario, Amanda Doggett, Liah Rahman, Allan Clifton, Robert Stout, John F Kelly, James MacKillop
{"title":"12-Step Participation Is Linked to Lower Drinking and Specific Impulsive Personality Traits in Early Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery.","authors":"Emily E Levitt, Kyla L Belisario, Amanda Doggett, Liah Rahman, Allan Clifton, Robert Stout, John F Kelly, James MacKillop","doi":"10.15288/jsad.25-00169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Participation in 12-step groups, such as Alcoholics Anonymous, confers benefits among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), and one candidate mechanism underlying these effects is reductions in impulsivity. Using a multidimensional assessment of impulsivity, the current study examined delay discounting and impulsive personality traits in a longitudinal cohort of adults with AUD initiating a significant recovery attempt.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective matched-sample cohort study design compared participants who reported a clinically meaningful increase in 12-step group attendance (i.e., increase of >1 meetings/week; <i>n</i> = 77) from enrollment to 6 weeks to a matched control group who did not increase attendance (<i>n</i> = 77). Drinking was assessed using the Timeline Followback (% drinking days [%DD], % heavy drinking days [%HDD]); impulsivity was assessed using the five-trial delay discounting task and five UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale subscales. Mediation models evaluated whether impulsivity explained the relationship between increased 12-step attendance and alcohol outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with matched controls, participants who increased 12-step group attendance showed greater reductions over time in %DD and %HDD (<i>p</i>s < .001), as well as Negative Urgency (i.e., acting out due to negative emotions) and Lack of Perseverance (i.e., failure to persist in tasks) (<i>p</i>s = .03) after their recovery attempt. Reductions in impulsivity, however, did not mediate the association between increased 12-step group attendance and drinking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased 12-step group attendance was associated with significant reductions in drinking and certain impulsivity traits in early AUD recovery. However, although the changes were contemporaneous, impulsivity did not explain the benefits associated with 12-step group attendance. Future research should evaluate this hypothesis in larger samples and over longer follow-up periods.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":"921-929"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.25-00169","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Participation in 12-step groups, such as Alcoholics Anonymous, confers benefits among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD), and one candidate mechanism underlying these effects is reductions in impulsivity. Using a multidimensional assessment of impulsivity, the current study examined delay discounting and impulsive personality traits in a longitudinal cohort of adults with AUD initiating a significant recovery attempt.

Method: A prospective matched-sample cohort study design compared participants who reported a clinically meaningful increase in 12-step group attendance (i.e., increase of >1 meetings/week; n = 77) from enrollment to 6 weeks to a matched control group who did not increase attendance (n = 77). Drinking was assessed using the Timeline Followback (% drinking days [%DD], % heavy drinking days [%HDD]); impulsivity was assessed using the five-trial delay discounting task and five UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale subscales. Mediation models evaluated whether impulsivity explained the relationship between increased 12-step attendance and alcohol outcomes.

Results: Compared with matched controls, participants who increased 12-step group attendance showed greater reductions over time in %DD and %HDD (ps < .001), as well as Negative Urgency (i.e., acting out due to negative emotions) and Lack of Perseverance (i.e., failure to persist in tasks) (ps = .03) after their recovery attempt. Reductions in impulsivity, however, did not mediate the association between increased 12-step group attendance and drinking.

Conclusions: Increased 12-step group attendance was associated with significant reductions in drinking and certain impulsivity traits in early AUD recovery. However, although the changes were contemporaneous, impulsivity did not explain the benefits associated with 12-step group attendance. Future research should evaluate this hypothesis in larger samples and over longer follow-up periods.

12步参与与早期酒精使用障碍恢复中的低饮酒量和特定冲动人格特征有关。
目的:参加12步小组(TS),如匿名戒酒会,对酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者有好处,其中一个潜在的机制是冲动性的减少。本研究利用冲动性的多维度评估,在一组开始进行重大康复尝试的成年AUD患者的纵向队列中,研究了延迟折扣(DD)和冲动性人格特征。方法:一项前瞻性匹配样本队列研究设计比较了从入组到6周,报告有临床意义的TS出勤率增加的参与者(即增加≥1次会议/周,n=77)和没有增加出勤率的匹配对照组(n=77)。使用时间线随访(饮酒天数百分比[%DD],重度饮酒天数百分比[%HDD])评估饮酒情况;冲动性评估采用5个试验DD任务和5个UPPS-P量表。中介模型评估冲动性是否解释了TS出勤率增加和酒精治疗结果之间的关系。结果:与匹配的对照组相比,增加TS的参与者在恢复尝试后显着表现出%DD和%HDD的降低(ps < 0.001),以及负面紧迫性(即由于负面情绪而采取行动)和缺乏毅力(即未能坚持任务)(ps = 0.03)。然而,冲动性的减少并没有调解TS出席率和饮酒增加之间的联系。结论:在AUD早期恢复中,TS出席率的增加与饮酒和某些冲动特征的显著减少有关。然而,虽然这些变化是同时发生的,但冲动并不能解释TS效应的好处。未来的研究应该在更大的样本和更长的随访期内评估这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书