The relationship between mental state decoding and real-world social functioning – An experience sampling investigation

IF 2.4 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Schizophrenia Research-Cognition Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2026.100419
Ronja Christensen , Eva Velthorst , Anne-Kathrin Fett
{"title":"The relationship between mental state decoding and real-world social functioning – An experience sampling investigation","authors":"Ronja Christensen ,&nbsp;Eva Velthorst ,&nbsp;Anne-Kathrin Fett","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2026.100419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Social cognition, particularly Theory of Mind (ToM), is thought to play a crucial role in social functioning. Patients with psychosis often exhibit ToM deficits, but research findings on associations with social outcomes in daily life remain conflicting.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study investigated the relationship between mental state decoding, a core aspect of ToM, measured by the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and quantity and subjective quality of real-life social interactions in patients with psychosis, first-degree relatives, and controls.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A 7-day Experience Sampling Method (ESM) design assessed the number and quality of real-life social interactions, including time spent alone vs. in social company, loneliness, feelings of social exclusion, preferences for company, being alone by choice, enjoyment of solitude, and perceived relationship quality in 27 patients with psychosis, 17 first-degree relatives, and 26 controls. All participants completed the RMET.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients scored lower on the RMET compared to both relatives (β = −0.13, <em>p</em> = .006) and controls (β = −0.19, <em>p</em> &lt; .001), suggesting mental state decoding deficits in patients. Relatives did not differ from controls (<em>p</em> = .17), suggesting no association with familial risk. Across groups, lower RMET scores predicted feelings of social exclusion (β = −0.05, <em>p</em> = .02) but there were no significant associations between RMET performance and other aspects of real-life social functioning (all <em>p</em> &gt; .7).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Lower RMET performance was linked to greater feelings of social exclusion across groups but was unrelated to other indicators of real-life social functioning, including social emotions or frequency of social interactions. This finding is in line with other recent ESM studies, and highlights the importance of other, possibly more proximal factors for real-life social functioning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article 100419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001326000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Social cognition, particularly Theory of Mind (ToM), is thought to play a crucial role in social functioning. Patients with psychosis often exhibit ToM deficits, but research findings on associations with social outcomes in daily life remain conflicting.

Objectives

This study investigated the relationship between mental state decoding, a core aspect of ToM, measured by the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and quantity and subjective quality of real-life social interactions in patients with psychosis, first-degree relatives, and controls.

Methods

A 7-day Experience Sampling Method (ESM) design assessed the number and quality of real-life social interactions, including time spent alone vs. in social company, loneliness, feelings of social exclusion, preferences for company, being alone by choice, enjoyment of solitude, and perceived relationship quality in 27 patients with psychosis, 17 first-degree relatives, and 26 controls. All participants completed the RMET.

Results

Patients scored lower on the RMET compared to both relatives (β = −0.13, p = .006) and controls (β = −0.19, p < .001), suggesting mental state decoding deficits in patients. Relatives did not differ from controls (p = .17), suggesting no association with familial risk. Across groups, lower RMET scores predicted feelings of social exclusion (β = −0.05, p = .02) but there were no significant associations between RMET performance and other aspects of real-life social functioning (all p > .7).

Conclusions

Lower RMET performance was linked to greater feelings of social exclusion across groups but was unrelated to other indicators of real-life social functioning, including social emotions or frequency of social interactions. This finding is in line with other recent ESM studies, and highlights the importance of other, possibly more proximal factors for real-life social functioning.
心理状态解码与现实社会功能的关系——经验抽样调查
社会认知,特别是心理理论(ToM),被认为在社会功能中起着至关重要的作用。精神病患者经常表现出ToM缺陷,但研究结果与日常生活中社会结果的关系仍然存在矛盾。目的探讨精神分裂症患者、一级亲属和对照组的心理状态解码与现实社会互动的数量和主观质量之间的关系。心理状态解码是精神分裂症的一个核心方面,由RMET测试测量。方法采用7天经验抽样法(ESM)设计评估27例精神病患者、17例一级亲属和26例对照者的现实社会互动的数量和质量,包括独处与社交陪伴的时间、孤独感、社会排斥感、对陪伴的偏好、选择独处、独处的享受和感知关系质量。所有参与者都完成了RMET。结果与亲属(β = - 0.13, p = .006)和对照组(β = - 0.19, p < .001)相比,患者的RMET得分较低,表明患者存在精神状态解码缺陷。亲属与对照组无差异(p = 0.17),提示与家族风险无关联。在各组中,较低的RMET分数预示着社会排斥感(β = - 0.05, p = .02),但RMET表现与现实生活中社会功能的其他方面之间没有显著关联(均p >; 7)。RMET表现较慢与群体中更大的社会排斥感有关,但与现实生活中社会功能的其他指标无关,包括社会情绪或社会互动频率。这一发现与最近的其他ESM研究一致,并强调了其他可能更接近现实社会功能的因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书