Is this real? Susceptibility to deepfakes in machines and humans.

IF 3.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Didem Pehlivanoglu, Mengdi Zhu, Jialong Zhen, Aude A Gagnon-Roberge, Rebecca K Kern, Damon Woodard, Brian S Cahill, Natalie C Ebner
{"title":"Is this real? Susceptibility to deepfakes in machines and humans.","authors":"Didem Pehlivanoglu, Mengdi Zhu, Jialong Zhen, Aude A Gagnon-Roberge, Rebecca K Kern, Damon Woodard, Brian S Cahill, Natalie C Ebner","doi":"10.1186/s41235-025-00700-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deepfakes are synthetic media created by deep-generative methods to fake a person's audio-visual representation. Growing sophistication of deepfake technology poses significant challenges for both machine learning (ML) algorithms and humans. Here we used real and deepfake static face images (Study 1) and dynamic videos (Study 2) to (i) investigate sources of misclassification errors in machines, (ii) identify psychological mechanisms underlying detection performance in humans, and (iii) compare humans and machines in their classification decision accuracy and confidence. Study 1 found that machines achieved excellent performance in classifying real and deepfake images, with good accuracy in feature classification. Humans, in contrast, experienced challenges in distinguishing between real and deepfake static images. Their classification accuracy was at chance level, and this underperformance relative to machines was accompanied by a truth bias and low confidence for the detection of deepfake images. Using dynamic video stimuli, Study 2 found that performance of machines was near chance level, with poor feature classification. Further, machines showed greater lie bias and reduced decision confidence relative to humans who outperformed machines in the detection of video deepfakes. Finally, Study 2 revealed that higher analytical thinking, lower positive affect, and greater internet skills were associated with better video deepfake detection in humans. Combined, the findings across these two studies advance understanding of factors contributing to deepfake detection in both machines and humans; and can inform intervention toward tackling the growing threat from deepfakes by identifying areas of particular benefit from human-AI collaboration to optimize the detection of deepfakes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46827,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","volume":"11 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12779810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Research-Principles and Implications","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00700-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deepfakes are synthetic media created by deep-generative methods to fake a person's audio-visual representation. Growing sophistication of deepfake technology poses significant challenges for both machine learning (ML) algorithms and humans. Here we used real and deepfake static face images (Study 1) and dynamic videos (Study 2) to (i) investigate sources of misclassification errors in machines, (ii) identify psychological mechanisms underlying detection performance in humans, and (iii) compare humans and machines in their classification decision accuracy and confidence. Study 1 found that machines achieved excellent performance in classifying real and deepfake images, with good accuracy in feature classification. Humans, in contrast, experienced challenges in distinguishing between real and deepfake static images. Their classification accuracy was at chance level, and this underperformance relative to machines was accompanied by a truth bias and low confidence for the detection of deepfake images. Using dynamic video stimuli, Study 2 found that performance of machines was near chance level, with poor feature classification. Further, machines showed greater lie bias and reduced decision confidence relative to humans who outperformed machines in the detection of video deepfakes. Finally, Study 2 revealed that higher analytical thinking, lower positive affect, and greater internet skills were associated with better video deepfake detection in humans. Combined, the findings across these two studies advance understanding of factors contributing to deepfake detection in both machines and humans; and can inform intervention toward tackling the growing threat from deepfakes by identifying areas of particular benefit from human-AI collaboration to optimize the detection of deepfakes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

这是真的吗?机器和人类对深度伪造的敏感性。
Deepfakes是通过深度生成方法创造的合成媒体,用来伪造一个人的视听表现。深度伪造技术的日益成熟对机器学习算法和人类都提出了重大挑战。在这里,我们使用真实和深度伪造的静态人脸图像(研究1)和动态视频(研究2)来(i)研究机器误分类错误的来源,(ii)确定人类检测性能的心理机制,以及(iii)比较人类和机器的分类决策准确性和置信度。研究1发现,机器在真实图像和深度假图像的分类上都取得了优异的成绩,在特征分类上也有很好的准确率。相比之下,人类在区分真实和深度伪造的静态图像方面遇到了挑战。它们的分类精度处于偶然水平,与机器相比,这种表现不佳伴随着对深度伪造图像检测的真相偏差和低置信度。使用动态视频刺激,研究2发现机器的表现接近机会水平,特征分类较差。此外,与人类相比,机器表现出更大的谎言偏见和更低的决策信心,而人类在检测视频深度伪造方面表现优于机器。最后,研究2显示,较高的分析思维、较低的积极情绪和较高的网络技能与人类更好的视频深度伪造检测有关。综合起来,这两项研究的发现促进了对机器和人类进行深度伪造检测的因素的理解;并且可以通过确定人类与人工智能合作的特别受益领域来优化深度伪造的检测,从而为应对深度伪造日益增长的威胁提供干预信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书