Contextual & physiological markers for individual distress (CP-MIND). Brain health as a comprehensive framework for Mental-health equity

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuroscience Pub Date : 2026-02-16 Epub Date: 2025-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.12.034
Juan Pablo Morales , Fiorella Macchiavello , Felipe Rojas-Thomas
{"title":"Contextual & physiological markers for individual distress (CP-MIND). Brain health as a comprehensive framework for Mental-health equity","authors":"Juan Pablo Morales ,&nbsp;Fiorella Macchiavello ,&nbsp;Felipe Rojas-Thomas","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.12.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Socioeconomic disadvantage shapes brain–mind health by intensifying exposures, resource scarcity, nutritional insecurity, violence, and weak social support, which dysregulate stress and immune systems. These conditions promote allostatic overload, whereby adaptive stress responses become maladaptive, degrading neural circuits for cognitive control and emotion regulation. In parallel, the microbiota–gut–brain axis links contextual adversity and diet quality to inflammation, barrier dysfunction, and neuroendocrine perturbations that further compromise resilience. Converging evidence connects these biological disruptions to structural and functional brain differences and higher risks of depression, anxiety, stress-related syndromes, and later neurodegeneration. While some sociocultural adaptations may bolster cooperation and communal coping, chronic physiological strain undermines durable resilience. This integrative review advances a combined framework, contextual &amp; physiological markers for Individual distress, nested within a brain–mind health perspective, to organise how socioeconomic disadvantage-related exposures are embedded biologically via allostatic and microbiota–gut–brain axis pathways and manifest as social-cognitive difficulties and affective symptoms. We synthesise evidence across behaviour, neural systems, and systemic physiology to identify leverage points for intervention. Priorities include early multi-domain strategies that reduce chronic stressors; strengthen sleep, nutrition, and social cohesion; and test mechanistic interventions (e.g., allostatic regulation, psychobiotic or dietary modulation) within equity-focused, life-course designs. Understanding how contextual and physiological markers interact is essential for designing effective, scalable policies and clinical approaches that mitigate adversity’s neurobiological impact and reduce long-term disparities in brain–mind health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"595 ","pages":"Pages 154-170"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452225011935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Socioeconomic disadvantage shapes brain–mind health by intensifying exposures, resource scarcity, nutritional insecurity, violence, and weak social support, which dysregulate stress and immune systems. These conditions promote allostatic overload, whereby adaptive stress responses become maladaptive, degrading neural circuits for cognitive control and emotion regulation. In parallel, the microbiota–gut–brain axis links contextual adversity and diet quality to inflammation, barrier dysfunction, and neuroendocrine perturbations that further compromise resilience. Converging evidence connects these biological disruptions to structural and functional brain differences and higher risks of depression, anxiety, stress-related syndromes, and later neurodegeneration. While some sociocultural adaptations may bolster cooperation and communal coping, chronic physiological strain undermines durable resilience. This integrative review advances a combined framework, contextual & physiological markers for Individual distress, nested within a brain–mind health perspective, to organise how socioeconomic disadvantage-related exposures are embedded biologically via allostatic and microbiota–gut–brain axis pathways and manifest as social-cognitive difficulties and affective symptoms. We synthesise evidence across behaviour, neural systems, and systemic physiology to identify leverage points for intervention. Priorities include early multi-domain strategies that reduce chronic stressors; strengthen sleep, nutrition, and social cohesion; and test mechanistic interventions (e.g., allostatic regulation, psychobiotic or dietary modulation) within equity-focused, life-course designs. Understanding how contextual and physiological markers interact is essential for designing effective, scalable policies and clinical approaches that mitigate adversity’s neurobiological impact and reduce long-term disparities in brain–mind health.
个体痛苦的环境和生理标记(CP-MIND)。大脑健康作为精神健康公平的综合框架。
社会经济劣势会加剧暴露、资源短缺、营养不安全、暴力和社会支持薄弱,从而导致压力和免疫系统失调,从而影响大脑-心理健康。这些情况会促进适应过载,从而使适应性应激反应变得不适应,降低认知控制和情绪调节的神经回路。与此同时,微生物-肠道-大脑轴将环境逆境和饮食质量与炎症、屏障功能障碍和神经内分泌紊乱联系起来,从而进一步损害恢复力。越来越多的证据表明,这些生物破坏与大脑结构和功能差异以及抑郁、焦虑、压力相关综合征和后来的神经退行性变的高风险有关。虽然一些社会文化适应可能会促进合作和共同应对,但长期的生理压力会破坏持久的恢复力。这一综合综述提出了一个综合框架,背景和生理标记的个人痛苦,嵌套在大脑-心理健康的角度,组织社会经济劣势相关的暴露如何通过适应和微生物-肠道-脑轴途径嵌入生物学,并表现为社会认知困难和情感症状。我们综合了行为、神经系统和系统生理学方面的证据,以确定干预的杠杆点。优先事项包括减少慢性压力源的早期多领域策略;加强睡眠、营养和社会凝聚力;并在以公平为中心的生命过程设计中测试机械干预(例如,适应调节,心理生物或饮食调节)。了解环境和生理标记如何相互作用,对于设计有效的、可扩展的政策和临床方法,减轻逆境的神经生物学影响,减少大脑-心理健康的长期差异至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书