“I care but it doesn't keep me up at night”: A qualitative exploration of perceptions of biodiversity-friendly food consumption

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Appetite Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2025.108426
Julia Q. Shen , Jonas House , Bob C. Mulder , Sigrid Wertheim-Heck
{"title":"“I care but it doesn't keep me up at night”: A qualitative exploration of perceptions of biodiversity-friendly food consumption","authors":"Julia Q. Shen ,&nbsp;Jonas House ,&nbsp;Bob C. Mulder ,&nbsp;Sigrid Wertheim-Heck","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biodiversity, crucial for resilient agri-food systems, is declining at an unprecedented rate, partly due to changing food systems. Lack of consumer willingness has been identified as a barrier to adopt biodiversity-friendly agricultural practices, however, a consumer perspective remains underexplored. This paper presents findings from four focus group discussions in the Netherlands with a relatively environmentally-conscious sample (N = 24), exploring how they perceive biodiversity-friendly production and consumption. These discussions reveal two main insights: first, participants are aware of the negative ecological impacts of food systems and can identify key drivers of biodiversity loss, such as increased chemical inputs, monocultures and unsustainable consumption patterns. They recognize the systemic nature of these problems, describing the system as ‘locked in’ by economic and institutional constraints. Second, while participants stress the role of consumers in driving food systems (change), they simultaneously express ambivalence around their own agency to do so. Mapped according to the COM-B model, the study identifies drivers and barriers related to people's perceived capability (e.g., limited visibility of biodiversity), opportunity (e.g., limited availability and accessibility of alternatives), and motivation (e.g., conflicting priorities) to consume in a more biodiversity-friendly way. We argue that this tension between responsibility and agency reflects a broader discourse of consumer responsibilization, in which individuals are assigned responsibility for solving broader problems through their consumption, without being given the means to. The study demonstrates the need for systems that enable biodiversity-friendly food consumption, as well as foster a more balanced societal discourse on responsibility and agency in food systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 108426"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325005793","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodiversity, crucial for resilient agri-food systems, is declining at an unprecedented rate, partly due to changing food systems. Lack of consumer willingness has been identified as a barrier to adopt biodiversity-friendly agricultural practices, however, a consumer perspective remains underexplored. This paper presents findings from four focus group discussions in the Netherlands with a relatively environmentally-conscious sample (N = 24), exploring how they perceive biodiversity-friendly production and consumption. These discussions reveal two main insights: first, participants are aware of the negative ecological impacts of food systems and can identify key drivers of biodiversity loss, such as increased chemical inputs, monocultures and unsustainable consumption patterns. They recognize the systemic nature of these problems, describing the system as ‘locked in’ by economic and institutional constraints. Second, while participants stress the role of consumers in driving food systems (change), they simultaneously express ambivalence around their own agency to do so. Mapped according to the COM-B model, the study identifies drivers and barriers related to people's perceived capability (e.g., limited visibility of biodiversity), opportunity (e.g., limited availability and accessibility of alternatives), and motivation (e.g., conflicting priorities) to consume in a more biodiversity-friendly way. We argue that this tension between responsibility and agency reflects a broader discourse of consumer responsibilization, in which individuals are assigned responsibility for solving broader problems through their consumption, without being given the means to. The study demonstrates the need for systems that enable biodiversity-friendly food consumption, as well as foster a more balanced societal discourse on responsibility and agency in food systems.
“我关心,但它不会让我夜不能寐”:对生物多样性友好型食品消费观念的定性探索。
生物多样性对有抵御力的农业粮食系统至关重要,但生物多样性正在以前所未有的速度下降,部分原因是粮食系统的变化。缺乏消费者意愿已被确定为采用生物多样性友好型农业做法的障碍,然而,消费者的观点仍未得到充分探讨。本文介绍了荷兰四个焦点小组讨论的结果,其中有一个相对环保意识的样本(N = 24),探讨了他们如何看待生物多样性友好型生产和消费。这些讨论揭示了两个主要见解:首先,与会者意识到粮食系统的负面生态影响,并能够确定生物多样性丧失的关键驱动因素,如化学品投入增加、单一栽培和不可持续的消费模式。他们认识到这些问题的系统性,并将其描述为经济和制度约束的“锁定”。第二,虽然参与者强调消费者在推动食品系统(变革)方面的作用,但他们同时对自己的机构这样做表示矛盾。根据COM-B模型,该研究确定了与人们感知能力(例如,生物多样性的有限可见性)、机会(例如,替代品的有限可用性和可及性)和动机(例如,优先事项冲突)相关的驱动因素和障碍,以更有利于生物多样性的方式消费。我们认为,责任和代理之间的这种紧张关系反映了一种更广泛的消费者责任话语,在这种话语中,个人被赋予了通过消费解决更广泛问题的责任,而没有被赋予这样做的手段。该研究表明,需要建立有利于生物多样性的粮食消费体系,并促进关于粮食系统责任和机构的更平衡的社会话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书