{"title":"Using Machine Learning for Identification: Development of the Cognitive Assessment Battery for Twice Exceptionality","authors":"Furkan Atmaca, Mustafa Baloğlu","doi":"10.1177/00169862251394277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The identification of twice-exceptional (2e) students is a complex challenge, primarily due to cognitive masking. In this study, we developed the Cognitive Assessment Battery for Twice Exceptionality (2eCAB) and evaluated the classification performance of a machine learning algorithm, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART). Grounded in prior literature, the 2eCAB was designed to assess nonverbal ability, memory, rapid automatized naming, and pseudoword reading. The sample included 565 Turkish-speaking elementary students: typically developing (TD, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 468), gifted ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 44), 2e ( <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 15), and students with specific learning disabilities (SLD, <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">n</jats:italic> = 38). The results indicated that the 2eCAB is a valid and reliable tool. Internal consistency of the battery was high (α = .95, ω = .95). Test–retest reliability for total scores was .92, while individual task scores ranged between .77 and .92. Significant relationships were found between 2eCAB scores, and results from hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit. Scores from four external assessments measuring nonverbal ability, working memory, naming speed, and reading were significantly correlated with 2eCAB scores. The trained CART algorithm achieved an acceptable overall classification accuracy for identifying 2e, gifted, TD, and SLD students. Thus, artificial intelligence technologies show promise for the identification of students with special needs.","PeriodicalId":47514,"journal":{"name":"Gifted Child Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted Child Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862251394277","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The identification of twice-exceptional (2e) students is a complex challenge, primarily due to cognitive masking. In this study, we developed the Cognitive Assessment Battery for Twice Exceptionality (2eCAB) and evaluated the classification performance of a machine learning algorithm, specifically Classification and Regression Trees (CART). Grounded in prior literature, the 2eCAB was designed to assess nonverbal ability, memory, rapid automatized naming, and pseudoword reading. The sample included 565 Turkish-speaking elementary students: typically developing (TD, n = 468), gifted ( n = 44), 2e ( n = 15), and students with specific learning disabilities (SLD, n = 38). The results indicated that the 2eCAB is a valid and reliable tool. Internal consistency of the battery was high (α = .95, ω = .95). Test–retest reliability for total scores was .92, while individual task scores ranged between .77 and .92. Significant relationships were found between 2eCAB scores, and results from hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis showed a good model fit. Scores from four external assessments measuring nonverbal ability, working memory, naming speed, and reading were significantly correlated with 2eCAB scores. The trained CART algorithm achieved an acceptable overall classification accuracy for identifying 2e, gifted, TD, and SLD students. Thus, artificial intelligence technologies show promise for the identification of students with special needs.
期刊介绍:
Gifted Child Quarterly (GCQ) is the official journal of the National Association for Gifted Children. As a leading journal in the field, GCQ publishes original scholarly reviews of the literature and quantitative or qualitative research studies. GCQ welcomes manuscripts offering new or creative insights about giftedness and talent development in the context of the school, the home, and the wider society. Manuscripts that explore policy and policy implications are also welcome. Additionally, GCQ reviews selected books relevant to the field, with an emphasis on scholarly texts or text with policy implications, and publishes reviews, essay reviews, and critiques.