Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Dynamic Gait Index in Dyslexic Children.

IF 2.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-14 DOI:10.1177/00315125251406682
Esin Topal-Seber, Evrim Karadag-Saygi, Ayca Evkaya-Acar, Duygu Karali-Bingul, Esra Giray
{"title":"Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Dynamic Gait Index in Dyslexic Children.","authors":"Esin Topal-Seber, Evrim Karadag-Saygi, Ayca Evkaya-Acar, Duygu Karali-Bingul, Esra Giray","doi":"10.1177/00315125251406682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) in dyslexic children. Sixty children aged 8-14 years were included. The original English DGI was translated into Turkish and cross-culturally adapted following standard guidelines. To evaluate its measurement properties, two independent raters assessed all children in a single session, and one of them repeated the evaluation after 7 days. Internal consistency was determined via Cronbach's alpha, while intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). We found the internal consistency of the DGI to be moderate, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.624, and it demonstrated good intra-rater (ICC = 0.85) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.83) reliability. Concurrent validity was examined by correlating DGI scores with the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and the Functional Reach Test (FRT) results using Spearman's correlation analysis. However, no significant correlations were found between DGI scores and TUG or FRT performance (<i>p</i> > 0.05). This pattern may be related to ceiling effects and the limited sensitivity of these tests to subtle gait and dynamic balance impairments in dyslexic children. Notably, dyslexic children scored significantly lower on the DGI and performed worse on the TUG compared with their non-dyslexic peers (DGI: <i>p</i> < 0.001; TUG: <i>p</i> = 0.035), whereas no significant difference was observed for FRT scores (<i>p</i> = 0.43). These findings indicate that the Turkish DGI shows good intra- and inter-rater reliability in dyslexic children, but that evidence for its concurrent validity with clinical balance tests (TUG and FRT) is limited. Further research is needed to identify complementary assessment tools that can provide a more comprehensive evaluation of balance in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"1473-1488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251406682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) in dyslexic children. Sixty children aged 8-14 years were included. The original English DGI was translated into Turkish and cross-culturally adapted following standard guidelines. To evaluate its measurement properties, two independent raters assessed all children in a single session, and one of them repeated the evaluation after 7 days. Internal consistency was determined via Cronbach's alpha, while intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC). We found the internal consistency of the DGI to be moderate, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.624, and it demonstrated good intra-rater (ICC = 0.85) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.83) reliability. Concurrent validity was examined by correlating DGI scores with the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and the Functional Reach Test (FRT) results using Spearman's correlation analysis. However, no significant correlations were found between DGI scores and TUG or FRT performance (p > 0.05). This pattern may be related to ceiling effects and the limited sensitivity of these tests to subtle gait and dynamic balance impairments in dyslexic children. Notably, dyslexic children scored significantly lower on the DGI and performed worse on the TUG compared with their non-dyslexic peers (DGI: p < 0.001; TUG: p = 0.035), whereas no significant difference was observed for FRT scores (p = 0.43). These findings indicate that the Turkish DGI shows good intra- and inter-rater reliability in dyslexic children, but that evidence for its concurrent validity with clinical balance tests (TUG and FRT) is limited. Further research is needed to identify complementary assessment tools that can provide a more comprehensive evaluation of balance in this population.

土耳其动态步态指数在诵读困难儿童中的效度和信度。
本研究探讨了土耳其语版动态步态指数(DGI)在诵读困难儿童中的心理测量特性。包括60名8-14岁的儿童。原始的英文DGI被翻译成土耳其语,并根据标准指南进行跨文化改编。为了评估其测量特性,两名独立的评价者在一次会议中对所有儿童进行评估,其中一名评价者在7天后重复评估。通过Cronbach's alpha确定内部一致性,而使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估组内和组间信度。我们发现DGI的内部一致性是中等的,Cronbach's alpha为0.624,并且表现出良好的评级内(ICC = 0.85)和评级间(ICC = 0.83)信度。并发效度采用Spearman相关分析将DGI分数与计时起跑测试(TUG)和功能到达测试(FRT)结果相关联来检验。然而,DGI评分与TUG或FRT表现之间没有显著相关性(p < 0.05)。这种模式可能与天花板效应和这些测试对诵读困难儿童细微步态和动态平衡障碍的有限敏感性有关。值得注意的是,与非阅读障碍儿童相比,阅读障碍儿童在DGI上的得分明显较低,在TUG上的表现也较差(DGI: p < 0.001; TUG: p = 0.035),而在FRT得分上没有显著差异(p = 0.43)。这些发现表明,土耳其DGI在阅读困难儿童中显示出良好的内部和内部信度,但其与临床平衡测试(TUG和FRT)同时有效的证据有限。需要进一步的研究来确定补充性的评估工具,以便对这一人群的平衡状况进行更全面的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书