Speech Enabled Reading Fluency Assessment: a Validation Study.

IF 10.1 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Max van der Velde, Wieke Harmsen, Bernard P Veldkamp, Remco Feskens, Jos Keuning, Nicole Swart
{"title":"Speech Enabled Reading Fluency Assessment: a Validation Study.","authors":"Max van der Velde, Wieke Harmsen, Bernard P Veldkamp, Remco Feskens, Jos Keuning, Nicole Swart","doi":"10.1007/s40593-025-00480-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the ability to comprehend what one is reading is one of the most fundamental necessities to function within society, the reading comprehension skills of students have recently been on the decline in many countries. An essential prerequisite to reading comprehension is the ability to read fluently, which is defined as the ability to read (aloud) with accuracy, speed, automaticity and prosody. Current oral reading fluency assessment instruments seldom provide detailed diagnostics however, and bestow a heavy testing burden on practitioners. Recent developments in Artificial Intelligence-based assessment methodology might provide a solution to current assessment issues, but thorough validations of such procedures have proven scarce. This study evaluates whether valid word decoding and passage reading measures (accuracy, speed and automaticity) can be generated for a semi-transparent language, using an automatic speech recognition (ASR) based oral reading fluency assessment instrument. A validation study was conducted, using the Argument-Based Approach to Validation. Data concerned 176 h of speech data, and the results of 569 and 622 oral word- and passage reading tests that are currently administered in primary schools, from 653 children attending the second- or third grade of Dutch primary education. The results of the validation indicate that it is possible to generate fluency metrics for a semi-transparent language, using an ASR-based oral reading fluency assessment instrument. Future researchers are advised to further optimize the ASR, evaluate its errors, and realize a prosody component, completing the envisioned reading fluency assessment instrument, thereby improving reading fluency assessment throughout primary education.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40593-025-00480-y.</p>","PeriodicalId":46637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education","volume":"35 4","pages":"2569-2595"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12686063/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00480-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the ability to comprehend what one is reading is one of the most fundamental necessities to function within society, the reading comprehension skills of students have recently been on the decline in many countries. An essential prerequisite to reading comprehension is the ability to read fluently, which is defined as the ability to read (aloud) with accuracy, speed, automaticity and prosody. Current oral reading fluency assessment instruments seldom provide detailed diagnostics however, and bestow a heavy testing burden on practitioners. Recent developments in Artificial Intelligence-based assessment methodology might provide a solution to current assessment issues, but thorough validations of such procedures have proven scarce. This study evaluates whether valid word decoding and passage reading measures (accuracy, speed and automaticity) can be generated for a semi-transparent language, using an automatic speech recognition (ASR) based oral reading fluency assessment instrument. A validation study was conducted, using the Argument-Based Approach to Validation. Data concerned 176 h of speech data, and the results of 569 and 622 oral word- and passage reading tests that are currently administered in primary schools, from 653 children attending the second- or third grade of Dutch primary education. The results of the validation indicate that it is possible to generate fluency metrics for a semi-transparent language, using an ASR-based oral reading fluency assessment instrument. Future researchers are advised to further optimize the ASR, evaluate its errors, and realize a prosody component, completing the envisioned reading fluency assessment instrument, thereby improving reading fluency assessment throughout primary education.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40593-025-00480-y.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

语音阅读流畅性评估:一项验证性研究。
虽然理解所读内容的能力是在社会中发挥作用的最基本的必要条件之一,但在许多国家,学生的阅读理解能力最近一直在下降。阅读理解的一个基本前提是流利的阅读能力,这被定义为准确、快速、自动和有韵律地朗读(大声朗读)的能力。然而,目前的口头阅读流畅性评估工具很少提供详细的诊断,并且给从业者带来了沉重的测试负担。基于人工智能的评估方法的最新发展可能为当前的评估问题提供解决方案,但对此类程序的彻底验证被证明是稀缺的。本研究使用基于自动语音识别(ASR)的口语阅读流畅性评估工具,评估是否可以为半透明语言生成有效的单词解码和段落阅读测量(准确性,速度和自动化)。使用基于论证的验证方法进行了验证研究。数据涉及176小时的语音数据,以及目前在小学进行的569次和622次口头单词和段落阅读测试的结果,这些测试来自荷兰小学二年级或三年级的653名儿童。验证结果表明,使用基于asr的口语阅读流畅性评估工具,可以为半透明语言生成流畅性指标。建议未来的研究人员进一步优化ASR,评估其错误,并实现韵律成分,完成设想的阅读流畅性评估工具,从而改善整个小学教育的阅读流畅性评估。补充信息:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s40593-025-00480-y。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: IJAIED publishes papers concerned with the application of AI to education. It aims to help the development of principles for the design of computer-based learning systems. Its premise is that such principles involve the modelling and representation of relevant aspects of knowledge, before implementation or during execution, and hence require the application of AI techniques and concepts. IJAIED has a very broad notion of the scope of AI and of a ''computer-based learning system'', as indicated by the following list of topics considered to be within the scope of IJAIED: adaptive and intelligent multimedia and hypermedia systemsagent-based learning environmentsAIED and teacher educationarchitectures for AIED systemsassessment and testing of learning outcomesauthoring systems and shells for AIED systemsbayesian and statistical methodscase-based systemscognitive developmentcognitive models of problem-solvingcognitive tools for learningcomputer-assisted language learningcomputer-supported collaborative learningdialogue (argumentation, explanation, negotiation, etc.) discovery environments and microworldsdistributed learning environmentseducational roboticsembedded training systemsempirical studies to inform the design of learning environmentsenvironments to support the learning of programmingevaluation of AIED systemsformal models of components of AIED systemshelp and advice systemshuman factors and interface designinstructional design principlesinstructional planningintelligent agents on the internetintelligent courseware for computer-based trainingintelligent tutoring systemsknowledge and skill acquisitionknowledge representation for instructionmodelling metacognitive skillsmodelling pedagogical interactionsmotivationnatural language interfaces for instructional systemsnetworked learning and teaching systemsneural models applied to AIED systemsperformance support systemspractical, real-world applications of AIED systemsqualitative reasoning in simulationssituated learning and cognitive apprenticeshipsocial and cultural aspects of learningstudent modelling and cognitive diagnosissupport for knowledge building communitiessupport for networked communicationtheories of learning and conceptual changetools for administration and curriculum integrationtools for the guided exploration of information resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书